Couldn't care less about your judgement here...
Okay, but I'm making a point for those who DO care about actually WINNING, about actually advancing the conservative agenda, and for those who keep wondering why conservatives don't ever WIN and/or wondering why the awful, Marxist, libtard agenda keeps advancing even though there are "more of us than them"?
My point is that there are MANY more "generally Republican voters" than there are "generally Democrat voters" who, just like Damo and Litmus, will quickly "jump ship", completely abandoning a candidate who would otherwise generally advance the conservative agenda, all because "that candidate did/said one (or two) thing(s) that I
REALLY dislike", usually rationalized via "but, muh principles tho". This is but one instance (of
numerous instances) of conservatives "shooting themselves in the foot", which directly results in the libtard agenda advancing while the conservative agenda retreats.
To provide another example, as a Christian who would like to see unborn children's lives saved, I know firsthand how the aforementioned actions actually harm instead of help. When a Christian, all because of "muh principles", refuses to support a "life begins at 12 weeks post-pregnancy bill", or even a "life begins at the first heartbeat bill", all because it's not a "life begins immediately at a fertilized egg bill", that Christian likewise "shoots himself in the foot" because, instead of SOME (or even MANY) unborn children's lives getting saved, the extreme Marxist agenda advances (nationwide legal abortions up until birth, if not even a bit
after birth) and then ZERO unborn children's lives get saved as a result.
Likewise, instead of voting for a candidate who has a proven track record of largely advancing the conservative agenda on
very key economic, energy, and foreign relations/national security issues, one doesn't vote for either major candidate, thus making it easier for the libtard candidate to win and advance the Marxist libtard agenda instead.
At some point, one just needs to be pragmatic and actually accomplish something.
If your definition of "conservative" includes people who would even suggest suspending portions of the constitution then IMHO you are advancing an agenda that is not something I can support, even if you label it "conservative".
He NEVER suggested that certain portions of the Constitution should be suspended.
When you read through and assess his truth social post, you need to take it as a
whole instead of merely picking out a small portion of it and then emotionally running with a particular interpretation of it based on how that small portion of it happens to be worded.
“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution, ... Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!” - Donald J. Trump
Obviously, since Trump
begins and ends his truth social post directly referring to the election fraud that took place, it can be reasonably concluded that what Trump is
talking about here is that the election fraud that occurred is what is causing said termination of rules (et al), even those rules that are found in the Constitution. IOW, it is the ELECTION FRAUD that is suspending portions of the Constitution; it is not Trump openly advocating for suspending portions of the Constitution.
It would do you better to assess his truth social post as a whole rather than reading way too deeply into a small portion of it that, when hyper-focusing on said small portion, loses sight of the context of the whole post, which is specifically about election fraud and remedying the damage that it caused.
