I am hereby challenging Cypress to a bet for charity

BRUTALITOPS

on indefiniate mod break
Contributor
I will bet you 100 dollars straight up that trump wins kansas

Loser must donate to a charity of the winners choice and provide proof of doing so.

Let me know if you are willing to put your money where your mouth is.

I am also fine with non-charity bets as well.
 
I will bet you 100 dollars straight up that trump wins kansas

Loser must donate to a charity of the winners choice and provide proof of doing so.

Let me know if you are willing to put your money where your mouth is.

I am also fine with non-charity bets as well.

Why would anyone make such a bet? Why involve charity? Just have the loser drop some cash to JPP, that way it isn't involving charity and morals.
 
I will bet you 100 dollars straight up that trump wins kansas

Loser must donate to a charity of the winners choice and provide proof of doing so.

Let me know if you are willing to put your money where your mouth is.

I am also fine with non-charity bets as well.
And I BET Cypress DOESN'T take you up on this. Cypress DOES appear to be a BIT of a weenie.
 
so you hate charities? :thinking:

When you're a Christian like me it's always a debate with gambling. Donating to charity isn't something for some political bet in this manner. I suppose you could throw down a donation to a charity of consensus or one the parties invested agree upon for fun but the idea of it being whatever you want seems not in good faith and a disservice to the ideas of charity. For example, could you see Billy having to donate to baby boomers? The Christian stance is very complex and varying so I won't even try to explain it too much.
 
How about it? Unfortunately it's become MOSTLY a shithole state, thanks to the Dim Dems.

Now that Truth Detector left, things are looking up:

"The economy of California is the largest in the United States, boasting a $3.2 trillion gross state product as of 2019. If California were a sovereign nation (2019), it would rank as the world's fifth largest economy, ahead of the UK, France, and behind Germany, Japan, China and United States."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

You're in ... Ohio? Good. Stay there!
 
Now that Truth Detector left, things are looking up:

"The economy of California is the largest in the United States, boasting a $3.2 trillion gross state product as of 2019. If California were a sovereign nation (2019), it would rank as the world's fifth largest economy, ahead of the UK, France, and behind Germany, Japan, China and United States."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

You're in ... Ohio? Good. Stay there!

It's STILL on its way to being a shithole state. EVERYTHING Dems touch DOES turn to shit.:|
 
Now that Truth Detector left, things are looking up:

"The economy of California is the largest in the United States, boasting a $3.2 trillion gross state product as of 2019. If California were a sovereign nation (2019), it would rank as the world's fifth largest economy, ahead of the UK, France, and behind Germany, Japan, China and United States."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

You're in ... Ohio? Good. Stay there!

How long would CA. survive if it weren't part of the US? Two, maybe three years?
 
When you're a Christian like me it's always a debate with gambling. Donating to charity isn't something for some political bet in this manner. I suppose you could throw down a donation to a charity of consensus or one the parties invested agree upon for fun but the idea of it being whatever you want seems not in good faith and a disservice to the ideas of charity. For example, could you see Billy having to donate to baby boomers? The Christian stance is very complex and varying so I won't even try to explain it too much.

Yeah, right. A "Christian" like you? You hate on Evangelicals and they are a large part of the givers to charities. They host many free meals on holidays, they have been handing out food during this China virus pandemic.
You are the last person to explain the "Christian stance" on anything. You're a hypocrite. Always were, always will be because you're a socialist and a taker.
 
When you're a Christian like me it's always a debate with gambling. Donating to charity isn't something for some political bet in this manner. I suppose you could throw down a donation to a charity of consensus or one the parties invested agree upon for fun but the idea of it being whatever you want seems not in good faith and a disservice to the ideas of charity. For example, could you see Billy having to donate to baby boomers? The Christian stance is very complex and varying so I won't even try to explain it too much.

Nobody cares ffs!!
 
Yeah, right. A "Christian" like you? You hate on Evangelicals and they are a large part of the givers to charities. They host many free meals on holidays, they have been handing out food during this China virus pandemic.
You are the last person to explain the "Christian stance" on anything. You're a hypocrite. Always were, always will be because you're a socialist and a taker.

Christianity has never been failing faster, the evangelicals have never been so worthless.
 
Back
Top