“I will fix abortion worries”
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
What the fuck are you prattling about? Say what? You are full to the brim of shit Wally.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
If it is a "woman's right to choose" and her decision alone and in totality, then why do men have to pay child support?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Because they weren't smart enough to wrap up before getting busy.
That is to help the kid. It is not a moral decision about sex or choice.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
No, it is about "fair and equal." If the man gets no decision in whether the child is born to begin with or not, why should he suddenly be forced to pay for a child that he had no part other than being a sperm donor in creating? If she wants child support, then he gets an equal say in everything from conception to age of majority, just like her.
No, you are wrong again. In the past, 50 or 60 years ago, boys would be accused of impregnating a girl. If he denied it or not, the courts forced him to pay. The logic was, it was about about helping the kid.
Nowadays, the parent who is raising the child and lives with it should make the decisions.
Because Hoes got to be Hoes. And they have simps wanting in who will go along with about anything to get their noodle wet. Pathetic beta males backing up their whoredness.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
That is nothing but a fallacy fallacy coupled to an historical fallacy that is being used as a definist fallacy.
To explain that: You start off with the presumption that what was going on in this regard 50 + years ago was somehow rational in a period where abortion was pretty much illegal. You then apply this idiocy to modern times as if nothing has changed. You then expect that your argument will be accepted.
You are dead flat wrong.
If two consenting people not married decide to have sex, it is the equivalent of a contract.
contract
That is, they have agreed to sex, and both parties are aware of the potential outcomes of their actions.
Thus, if the female involved gets pregnant, she was aware going into having sex that might happen. The male involved, likewise.
For the idiots on the Left and assorted moron Feminists, what comes next is completely contrary to legal practice. That is, IT IS A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE.
No, it is the couple's right to choose. That follows legal contract law and common sense. The outcome of that is decided by both parties.
But, with the Left, and feminists, they want it in their favor and that's that. They want the woman to have complete decision power up to the moment of birth where the rules suddenly change and the man involved is now, inexplicably, responsible for half the costs of raising the child to age of majority.
It is YOU that is the imbecile here. What you argue is illogical and worse, not "Fair and Equal."