If Bush said....

Thing1 said:
I'm so embarassed for you.

Obama said, repeatedly, that you'd be able to keep your own plan - and he repeatedly ended that with a PERIOD for emphasis.

And your apologism for this is that he meant to say, "you can keep your own plan. Period. Well, unless you're part of the smaller group that can't keep their own plan."
Click to expand...


and who dropped the plans?


the insurance company.


that is NOT the ACAs fault now is it?
 
do you guys even know the percent of policies this effects?



You see Bush lied about 100% of the WMDs
 
NOVA said:
Its only an idiot word parser like you that must have the exact same words used in the same order to be 'exactly' the same thing, right ?....

They all claimed ESSENTIALLY the same thing ..... is that better....

It Jim said "its not as cold today" and Joe said "its warmer today" , only an asshole like you argue they were saying different things....

You're dismissed Pedro, I've wasted more than enough time with you.
Click to expand...

the supposed absolute certainty of Saddam's WMD stockpiles, when considered with the supposed pre-9/11 collaboration between Al Qaeda and Iraq, allowed Bush to convince America to rush to war. It really is that simple.
 
maineman said:
and I have yet to see any significant proof that Obama had foreseen the insurance companies marketing substandard policies after the passage of the ACA... what he said may, in fact, have turned out not to be true, but that, in and of itself, does not make it a LIE. It's only a lie when if he knew it was false when he uttered it... kinda like Bush reading the NIE's which all contained degrees of doubt concerning Saddam's stockpiles of WMD's and then, after reading them, proclaiming that THERE IS NO DOUBT that Saddam had those very stockpiles. There are lies and there are statements which time shows to be inaccurate... there is a difference.
Click to expand...

what 'substandard' policies are those Maine?

The arrogance that people like you have pretending YOU (or Obama) know what policies are 'best' for them is astounding. Your master is DELIBERATELY fucking people over and forcing them into policies that are WORSE for them individually and making them pay for OTHER people's health issues... and YOU cheer him on.
 
cost spreading is what caused this problem you fool.

they wanted to insure only healthy people.


they were looking for more profit where ever they could find it.
 
I'm just glad the democrat attack dogs are knowing at the healthcare industry instead of oil!
See what can be done without the facist attacking you.
Keep this fight going another 6 years
 
maineman said:
the supposed absolute certainty of Saddam's WMD stockpiles, when considered with the supposed pre-9/11 collaboration between Al Qaeda and Iraq, allowed Bush to convince America to rush to war. It really is that simple.
Click to expand...

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Damn liar.
 
NOVA said:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Damn liar.
Click to expand...

well... she didn't say that there was certainty about stockpiles, and, if she had information about harboring AQ members, that was, as we know now, faulty... but if she didn't know it was inaccurate when she said it, it was not a lie, was it? Whereas BUSH was well aware of lots of doubts within his own intelligence apparatus when he lied and said there were none.
 
NOVA said:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Damn liar.
Click to expand...

Such bullshit. Every country in the mid-east (not Israel) has and does. We havent invaded them. And Saddam was secular and cheap. He had no idealogical interest in them....so most likely less investment than other countries as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top