uscitizen
Villified User
Why didn't they use tasers?
too much political repercussions with the Taser.
Why didn't they use tasers?
Why didn't they use tasers?
too much political repercussions with the Taser.
Why didn't they use tasers?
Yeah, shooting the person 20 times is much more politically palatable.
Well some think that waterboarding is worse than blowing up or otherwise killing perhaps 1 million Iraqi folks....
All over an invasion based on lies....
If I have a gun and you whip out a taser, I win.Why didn't they use tasers?
20 times just means a number of cops fired a couple of times each.
If I have a gun and you whip out a taser, I win.
USC may suffer from some kind of mental disease that makes it impossible for him to focus on more than one topic in a 5 year span. He's been talking nonstop about Iraq for years, regardless of what the topic under discussion is.
It's annoying and it's why I don't normally engage him in debate.
20 times just means a number of cops fired a couple of times each.
The simple fact is they don't know where his gun is. You do not go to a gunfight, even a suspected one, with a taser. If I have a gun and you have a taser in a gunfight, I will beat you every time.OK, who was pointing the weapon here? Even if he had a gun, it was in his pocket. A taser disables a person every bit as much as a gun without killing them.
The simple fact is they don't know where his gun is. You do not go to a gunfight, even a suspected one, with a taser. If I have a gun and you have a taser in a gunfight, I will beat you every time.
And a number of cops weren't communicating with each other.