True.he didn't say whether he was inactive or active reserves.
I just don't see how my service plays into this, and damo is correct.
Obama, who votes 'present' most of the time rather than take a position is not the man to tackle the very serious issues we face the he quit frankly, is ignoring, You can't take the politically safe position as President, you can't vote 'present' as President.
I tried the active reserves after I got out. My first weekend we had inspection. I had a thread hanging off my unit patch, a gig without a doubt, but the First Sergent's BDU buttons were screaming from him being so overweight and I thought, "I'll be damned if this shitbag overweight fuck is going to inspect me when he is so obviously not in compliance with regs." So I quit.
Jeeze since I must defend my service record...
4 years active, 4 years IRR, during most of this I have stood on call during this time of war, you can examine my statements since FP.com, I've been awaiting a call up, and been shocked they haven't. I'm no delta operative, but have worn the uniform, and I will eventually return when the pieces fit. I never said I left early, WTF are you talking about???
You should study the rules of the Illinois State Senate before you make that silly silly claim. IN fact your claim illistrates your extreem ignorance on the subject.
In Illinois, if you like a bill, but want something changed about it, so you want it returned to committee for revisions, you vote Present, in stead of yes or no. That way the bill is not killed, but sent back for changes.
I learned that from Rush Linberger, explaining why Obama voted present so many times!
nice way to spin not taking a position so many times. Oh that's how the game is played. If he didn't like it he could vote no, it by default goes back to the drawing board, and he's taken a position. Nice try though...
No, you clearly lack an understanding of the process a bill goes through in the Illinois State Legislature, by voting "no" the bill is killed and must start the process over again from the begining. If, however, enough people vote "present" the bill merely goes back one step... to the comittee to be rescheduled for a new vote once amendments have had a chance to be attached.
Obama, who votes 'present' most of the time rather than take a position is not the man to tackle the very serious issues we face the he quit frankly, is ignoring, You can't take the politically safe position as President, you can't vote 'present' as President.
that's not the kind of leadership America is looking for.
lol what a crock, you have a simple choice, yes or no, or present. Obama choose present instead of taking some positions, either way it goes back to the drawing board, if it doesn't pass, so if he had problems with it he gambled bad legislation would pass, and that's not the kind of leadership America is looking for. Sounds like just another spineless Washington politician racing for a Presidential bid way way to early. If he had a problem with certain aspects of a bill he could just as well said no, and your ridicules spin for this blank page of a Senator is laughable.
Please, you're obviously the one who doesn't understand how legislation works, now go back to google and try harder...