SmarterthanYou
rebel
why would you ignore the quotes and commentaries from the men who debated on it?Have you got any quotes that are less than 200 years old?
why would you ignore the quotes and commentaries from the men who debated on it?Have you got any quotes that are less than 200 years old?
tapatalk does not inform you if you are banned. you literally have no way of even knowing. There is no message saying you are banned, you don't see the list of names, etc.
If one posts in a thread they are banned in, they will have their posts deleted and it's helpful to tell them they have been banned from the thread. You'll notice ILA didn't come back into the thread after he was informed.
If people keep posting in a thread after being informed they are banned, then we will deal with that issue when it comes up.
then it begs the question 'is all life conceived'?
It begs NO question, it is an immutable fact. You have two cells, a sperm and ovum (egg), they fuse together, at this point, they are two independent organic cells which have fused together. Conception is the point of successful fertilization, when the fused couple reproduce another cell. Once that has happened, the life process for a unique living organism has begun, there is no other point which can be defined as the start of this process. In the principles of basic physics, matter doesn't create matter, and matter doesn't materialize from nothing, therefore, if a cell was created by the fused cells, it has to be new organic life in process, there is no other physical explanation. The reproduction of just one cell, qualifies it as a living organism, nothing else is required. It doesn't even have to produce a functional cell, the art of reproducing something is all that is required to meet the criteria. If the fused cells fail to reproduce, they expire and never become a unique living organism.
Oh, that makes a lot of sense, NOT!
Regarding human beings if the necessary ingredients are not present, as in producing a functional cell, then there is no human being. Anyone can decide on any criteria. That doesn't mean it makes sense. We would never use such criteria to define anything else. The guy had a piece of wood and a screw so that means he built a bookcase. Yea, that makes sense.![]()
yep as I said the militia failed miserably and should have been written out of the constitution for it.
Sorry, biology disagrees with you. Reproducing is all that is required to qualify as a living organism. It has to be a living organism because it's impossible for it to be anything else. If the two fused cells reproduce anything, they 'carried on the process' and were a living organism. If they failed to produce another cell, or even produced an incomplete cell, they still reproduced something, and matter doesn't create matter, therefore, it's a living organism. It may immediately cease to be a living organism, that doesn't ever change what it was, what it had to be. It doesn't matter how much sense it makes to a moron.