Investigating the investigators? Why not?

Robo said:
Except Mueller just delivered the proof it was a witch hunt, is his IQ in question also?

So where you're coming from, it was great to investigate Trump, but investigating the witch hunters should be a BIG NO NO, right?
Click to expand...

Remember that Mueller spent two years looking at every fabricated bit of crap as if it were real evidence, including the faked report of Russian collusion, prosecuted people for process crimes (crimes that only existed as a result of the investigation), and broke privacy laws.
 
Tkaffen said:
Thank you for proving my point jack ass. Let’s investigate his tax records maybe something is there.
What an asshole.
Like most jack ass members it’s search and destroy, ignore the rule of law.

Provide evidence that Obama was under investigation during his term in office or are you pulling this out of your ass.

You are an ignorant idiot. The investigation started when the jack asses gave false information to the court for wire taps.
Idiots like you really believed the Steele report. Pitiful.

Repost when you know the facts or if Trump is thrown out of office.
Click to expand...

You really are one dumb f**k as are most of your kind. Low IQ's, and ignorance, is all you have.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...s-President-Trump-Congress-also-investigated/

But tell me asswipe, do you suck on your thumb before, or after, you stick it up Trumps ass:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/russia-probe-timeline-moscow-mueller/story?id=57427441
 
Old Trapper said:
Another example of the hypocrisy of the right wing children. You whine about the investigation of Trump, and then expect more investigations of Democrats.

The only ones that think this was a "witch hunt" are the low IQ supporters of Trump.
Click to expand...

You carefully avoided answering the question(s)!!

Are you worried and scared and by not answering, you're hoping they go away??

"
 
Old Trapper said:
Only problem is that the low IQ types like you wish Mueller had said it was a "witch hunt" just as your dick sucking President has declared. But he didn't. And he was not exonerated on any charges especially the obstruction charges as you will find out of the Democrats have the balls to go forward with impeachment.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ueller-said-trump-had-to-engage-in-witch-hunt
Click to expand...

[translation]------>
LightheartedUnevenGypsymoth-size_restricted.gif
<-----[/translation]

095ea45e2311cd42867eb1923bf858c3.gif

​
 
Old Trapper said:
You really are one dumb f**k as are most of your kind. Low IQ's, and ignorance, is all you have.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...s-President-Trump-Congress-also-investigated/

But tell me asswipe, do you suck on your thumb before, or after, you stick it up Trumps ass:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/russia-probe-timeline-moscow-mueller/story?id=57427441
Click to expand...

You can’t tell the difference between the types of investigations conducted during Obama administration versus against Trump. Moron
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Because there is no credible evidence that you can cite that justifies any such investigation, silly whore.

And you wouldn't know a rational and reasonable argument if it were sodomizing you.
Click to expand...

The Steel dossier, Strzok & Page emails, the Comey memo exonerating Hillary Clinton before she was even interviewed, testimony that Rosenstein offered to wear a wire to trap the President, the known evidence that the FBI was spying on Trump and his campaign members without a legal warrant, FISA court abuse, emails proving that Andrew McCabe held meetings in his office to conspire against Trump ever becoming President and instituting an "insurance policy" to remove him after he got elected, Clinton acid washing her server and having blackberries and other electronic mobile devices smashed up, the involvement of the intel agencies Clapper and others involvement in the coup-de-qua to exonerate Hillary Clinton of felonies & frame Donald Trump. NO EVIDENCE? You're kidding, right?????
 
Robo said:
Except Mueller just delivered the proof it was a witch hunt, is his IQ in question also?

So where you're coming from, it was great to investigate Trump, but investigating the witch hunters should be a BIG NO NO, right?
Click to expand...

Indictments, guilty pleas and convictions would be proof it wasn't a witch hunt. Your argument would lead to the ridiculous assumption that every time police and prosecutors get a conviction we need to investigate them because they weren't doing their job.
 
Into the Night said:
Remember that Mueller spent two years looking at every fabricated bit of crap as if it were real evidence, including the faked report of Russian collusion, prosecuted people for process crimes (crimes that only existed as a result of the investigation), and broke privacy laws.
Click to expand...

Remember that Mueller never looked into the illegal Clinton exoneration by his pal Comey, nor did he look at the COLLUSION by Clinton and the DNC with the Russians, the Steel dossier and the truck load of evidence gathered by the House and Senate investigations showing the illegal exoneration of Clinton & the spying on Trump and a coup-de-qua to frame and remove Trump.

Let the real and legitimate investigation begin! Lawyer up lefties!!!!!!!
 
Robo said:
Remember that Mueller never looked into the illegal Clinton exoneration by his pal Comey, nor did he look at the COLLUSION by Clinton and the DNC with the Russians, the Steel dossier and the truck load of evidence gathered by the House and Senate investigations showing the illegal exoneration of Clinton & the spying on Trump and a coup-de-qua to frame and remove Trump.

Let the real and legitimate investigation begin! Lawyer up lefties!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

So if an investigation doesn't find any evidence to charge someone with a crime it is corrupt but if the investigation does find evidence and charges people with crimes it is a witch hunt. What an interesting world you live in.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Because there is no credible evidence that you can cite that justifies any such investigation, silly whore.

And you wouldn't know a rational and reasonable argument if it were sodomizing you.
Click to expand...

But there is.

The collusion accusation itself was fabricated. The people that introduced it are known. Some of the funding for it is known. The process crimes are real. The instances of broken privacy laws are real. The abuse of citizens of the United States by the investigation team is real.

Even the argument presented by Robo is a real and valid argument. It contains no fallacy. You, on the other hand, have made an argument of the stone fallacy and an insult fallacy.
 
Tkaffen said:
You can’t tell the difference between the types of investigations conducted during Obama administration versus against Trump. Moron
Click to expand...

Sorry dumb f**k, but an investigation is an investigation. Now, go back to your corner, and suck on your thumb some more. At least Obama had the guts to actually testify, and turn over information unlike your spineless leader.
 
Into the Night said:
But there is.

The collusion accusation itself was fabricated. The people that introduced it are known. Some of the funding for it is known. The process crimes are real. The instances of broken privacy laws are real. The abuse of citizens of the United States by the investigation team is real.

Even the argument presented by Robo is a real and valid argument. It contains no fallacy. You, on the other hand, have made an argument of the stone fallacy and an insult fallacy.
Click to expand...

You are only citing your opinion. Now supply the proof.
 
Robo said:
Investigate the investigators? Why not?

Is there really any good reason why the Attorney General William Barr shouldn’t investigate the people who were involved in the Trump collusion & obstruction investigation? Why shouldn’t the American folks have their AG take a real good look at what evidence those old Obama Department of Justice folks had to institute what turned out to be a witch hunt like our President said it was? Is there anybody here on JPP who can make a rational and reasonable argument against investigating the investigators? I’d love to see that argument.
Click to expand...

Where’s Huber? Still asking...
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So if an investigation doesn't find any evidence to charge someone with a crime it is corrupt but if the investigation does find evidence and charges people with crimes it is a witch hunt. What an interesting world you live in.
Click to expand...

If an investigation into "COLLUSION" gets "NOBODY" convicted of "COLLUSION" it certainly was a bleeping "WITCH HUNT' & "FISHING EXPEDITION" & an attempt to "FRAME" Donald J. Trump.

We shall now see what the DOJ's Inspector General comes up with & Barr's investigation uncovers in FISA abuse and the spying on the Trump Campaign.

"Lawyer up" lefties! The real and legitimate investigation is just getting underway!!!!!!
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Indictments, guilty pleas and convictions would be proof it wasn't a witch hunt. Your argument would lead to the ridiculous assumption that every time police and prosecutors get a conviction we need to investigate them because they weren't doing their job.
Click to expand...

The Mueller investigation was supposed to be about Russian/Trump collusion. Nobody was charged or convicted of that. The Mueller investigation was simply a rigged fishing expedition & witch hunt & a quest to frame Donald J. Trump, President of these United States with a crime. It was never an investigation looking for the criminal, it was always an investigation looking for a crime to frame an innocent man of whatever trumped up crime they could invent. All of the evidence is Oh so apparent what the Mueller investigation was all about!

Lawyer up lefties! The real & legitimate investigation of the investigators is just getting underway!!!!!!!
 
Robo said:
Investigate the investigators? Why not?

Is there really any good reason why the Attorney General William Barr shouldn’t investigate the people who were involved in the Trump collusion & obstruction investigation? Why shouldn’t the American folks have their AG take a real good look at what evidence those old Obama Department of Justice folks had to institute what turned out to be a witch hunt like our President said it was? Is there anybody here on JPP who can make a rational and reasonable argument against investigating the investigators? I’d love to see that argument.
Click to expand...

I am all for it, they should launch yet another investigation into Hillary Clinton, its worked well for the Republican party over the last 20 years. They never found ANYTHING, but it seems to work and they all seem to believe she is guilty of everything from murder to embezzlement to selling America's uranium stores to Russia. Keep that gravy train going.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top