Investigating the investigators? Why not?

[Into the Night]

Because I know it gets under his skin.

You, being a moron, aren't expected to understand that, honey.

So I'm not on your ignore list either, eh?

You're a liar, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

No, there isn't, nor can you demonstrate otherwise.

Yes there is. It's public record. Anyone can look it up.

No, it wasn't fabricated

Yes it was. No one was convicted of collusion.

and no one was abused.

Have you forgotten the pre-dawn raid on a private citizen with CNN scheduled to be there to film it? Have you forgotten the grilling for hours and hours, sometimes even days?

You simply stomping your tiny feet and screaming that it's true won't magically make it true, simp.

Inversion fallacy.

Newp. Haven't offered either fallacy, nor can you demonstrate that I have.

Yes you have. Argument of the stone fallacy. I need not demonstrate anything. Your own posts do that.

Literally nothing he posted was real or valid.

Yes it was. Denying it doesn't make it go away.

This seems really, really difficult for you.

Projection.

 

[Into the Night]

None of that is credible evidence of your asinine claims, silly whore, and most of it is pure fantasy. "FISA abuse'?!?!? What a sucker.

And your instance that there was a coup is simply more evidence that you're desperately pulling things straight out of your ass in an attempt to distract from the fact that you have nothing.

Christ, have you always been this stupid?

It's really got to sting for you, considering the current active 20 state and federal investigations into Trump, his family, his admin, his businesses and his inauguration.

To say nothing for the clear case that he committed obstruction.

No obstruction was committed by Trump. You are making it up.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

No obstruction was committed by Trump. You are making it up.

Yep, there was plenty. All documented by Mueller in the report for Congress to pursue further.

You, being a liar and quite stupid, wouldn't know. You haven't read it.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

Yes there is. It's public record. Anyone can look it up.

No, it's not. If it were, you could demonstrate it. But you can't. Fail.

Yes it was. No one was convicted of collusion.

LOL! Nor could they be. Mueller couldn't try anyone because of the OLC policy, retard. But collusion was indeed established.

Have you forgotten the pre-dawn raid on a private citizen with CNN scheduled to be there to film it? Have you forgotten the grilling for hours and hours, sometimes even days?

Lawfully executing a legal search warrant and interrogation isn't abuse, you pussy.

Inversion fallacy.

No such fallacy exists, gfm.

Yes you have. Argument of the stone fallacy. I need not demonstrate anything. Your own posts do that.

Thanks for admitting you lied and that you cannot demonstrate either fallacy, gfm

Yes it was. Denying it doesn't make it go away.

Literally nothing he posted was real or valid.

Projection.

Nice owning you.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

So I'm not on your ignore list either, eh?

You're a liar, dude.

No, you're not. You should really get help with your meth and alcohol addictions, gfm.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me.

It's their way of saying they're my bitch.

Fun!!!

 

[Into the Night]

How could you know? You can't see my posts; but trust me when I say it doesn't. It makes me laugh at what an ignorant buffoon you are. Next you'll pretend you didn't read this too!!

He really is building his own paradox with his lies.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep, there was plenty. All documented by Mueller in the report for Congress to pursue further.

No, it isn't.

You, being a liar and quite stupid, wouldn't know. You haven't read it.

Yes I have.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

No, it isn't.

Yep. 10 different instances.

Yes I have.

LOL! No, silly meth-head, you haven't.

 

[Into the Night]

No, it's not. If it were, you could demonstrate it. But you can't. Fail.

I don't need to demonstrate it. The record speaks for itself.

LOL! Nor could they be. Mueller couldn't try anyone because of the OLC policy, retard. But collusion was indeed established.

What part of 'no collusion' is confusing to you?

Lawfully executing a legal search warrant and interrogation isn't abuse, you pussy.

Irrelevance fallacy. I am talking about pre-dawn raids on private citizens, not search warrants at all.

No such fallacy exists, gfm.

I am not gfm. I taught him some logic, though. Yes, an inversion fallacy exists. It is essentially you projecting yourself onto another in the form of an argument.

Thanks for admitting you lied and that you cannot demonstrate either fallacy, gfm

Fallacies don't need to be 'demonstrated'. They are errors in logic, just like a math error. It is YOU that is making the fallacies. A fallacy is not a valid argument.

Literally nothing he posted was real or valid.

Yes it was. You are chanting.

Nice owning you.

You don't own anything. You have also denied your own argument. You are chanting.

 

[Into the Night]

No, you're not. You should really get help with your meth and alcohol addictions, gfm.

Insult fallacy. I am not gfm. He simply knows what fallacies are as well and why most of them exist.

 

[Into the Night]

How could you know? You can't see my posts; but trust me when I say it doesn't. It makes me laugh at what an ignorant buffoon you are. Next you'll pretend you didn't read this too!!

Probably. He really is very strange.

 

[Into the Night]

I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me.

It's their way of saying they're my bitch.

Fun!!!

Paradox.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep. 10 different instances.

LOL! No, silly meth-head, you haven't.

Zero, liar.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

Zero, liar.

10, silly meth-head.

Nice owning you!

 

[CharacterAssassin]

Insult fallacy. I am not gfm. He simply knows what fallacies are as well and why most of them exist.

Inversion fallacy, gfm!

 

[CharacterAssassin]

I don't need to demonstrate it. The record speaks for itself.

Thanks for admitting you lied and that you cannot demonstrate it.

What part of 'no collusion' is confusing to you?

That's not what the Mueller Report says, silly meth-head.

Irrelevance fallacy. I am talking about pre-dawn raids on private citizens, not search warrants at all.

All done with legal court-order search warrants. Please stop doing so much meth.

I am not gfm. I taught him some logic, though. Yes, an inversion fallacy exists. It is essentially you projecting yourself onto another in the form of an argument.

So you admit you're gfm and that no such fallacy exists? Thanks, gfm!

Fallacies don't need to be 'demonstrated'. They are errors in logic, just like a math error. It is YOU that is making the fallacies. A fallacy is not a valid argument.

You wouldn't know logic if it were sodomizing you, gfm.

Yes it was. You are chanting.

You don't own anything. You have also denied your own argument. You are chanting.

Nice owning you and thanks for admitting you lied and that you're my bitch, gfm.

I order you to reply to this post, gfm.

 

[Minister of Truth]

The fact remains that Congress has the power to impeach a president for "political crimes," like Trump's efforts to obstruct or his campaign remarks, such as encouraging the Russians to hack and leak the DNC. However, everyone recognizes that the public will never support such an effort, and demands actual criminally prosecutable crimes be committed in order to support impeachment and conviction.

Which means that Trump wins.

 

[Truth Detector]

Is that in centigrade?

Okay THAT, was funny.