Investigating the investigators? Why not?

CharacterAssassin said:
Thanks for admitting you lied and that you cannot demonstrate it.
Click to expand...
Never did, liar.
CharacterAssassin said:
That's not what the Mueller Report says, silly meth-head.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't, liar.
CharacterAssassin said:
All done with legal court-order search warrants.
Click to expand...
No one is talking about search warrants but you. You are fixated on an irrelevant topic.
CharacterAssassin said:
Please stop doing so much meth.
Click to expand...
Never touch the stuff, liar.
CharacterAssassin said:
So you admit you're gfm and that no such fallacy exists? Thanks, gfm!
Click to expand...
Never did, liar. The inversion fallacy exists, even though you deny it. I guess you have to, since you use it so often.
CharacterAssassin said:
You wouldn't know logic if it were sodomizing you, gfm.
Click to expand...
More insults. More lies.
CharacterAssassin said:
Nice owning you and thanks for admitting you lied and that you're my bitch, gfm.
Click to expand...
Never did, liar.
CharacterAssassin said:
I order you to reply to this post, gfm.
Click to expand...
You can't. I responded anyway.
 
Into the Night said:
Never did, liar.

No it doesn't, liar.

No one is talking about search warrants but you. You are fixated on an irrelevant topic.

Never touch the stuff, liar.

Never did, liar. The inversion fallacy exists, even though you deny it. I guess you have to, since you use it so often.

More insults. More lies.

Never did, liar.

You can't. I responded anyway.
Click to expand...

LOLOL! By posting that you just admitted you lied, gfm!

Thanks for admitting that you lied, gfm.

Sad that you're so fucked up on meth.
 
Howard the Duck said:
The fact remains that Congress has the power to impeach a president for "political crimes," like Trump's efforts to obstruct or his campaign remarks, such as encouraging the Russians to hack and leak the DNC. However, everyone recognizes that the public will never support such an effort, and demands actual criminally prosecutable crimes be committed in order to support impeachment and conviction.

Which means that Trump wins.
Click to expand...

Which is all wholly irrelevant to the fact that Trump, his family, his business, his campaign and his inauguration are all still under 20 separate federal and state investigations.

That said, he clearly committed obstruction, and if the Dems go forward, that's what they'll start with.
 
Howard the Duck said:
The fact remains that Congress has the power to impeach a president for "political crimes," like Trump's efforts to obstruct or his campaign remarks, such as encouraging the Russians to hack and leak the DNC. However, everyone recognizes that the public will never support such an effort, and demands actual criminally prosecutable crimes be committed in order to support impeachment and conviction.

Which means that Trump wins.
Click to expand...

Actually, it doesn't work quite that way. Sort of, but not quite.

The House draws up the articles of impeachment. They cannot convict. They can only accuse.

The Senate does the actual trial. There is a trial for each article drawn up, independent of any other article.

If the Senate decides to impeach according to one of these articles, they also decide the punishment (which can result in expulsion from office). At this point, the Vice President becomes President until the next election. He will choose the next Vice President, who will serve until the next election.

Currently the House is making various accusations. I doubt the Senate will give an earful to any of them. These accusations might not even make it out of the House (they have to vote on each one of them). Will they have the guts to go on record that way? Will the Senate? Here the people will get their say.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Which is all wholly irrelevant to the fact that Trump, his family, his business, his campaign and his inauguration are all still under 20 separate federal and state investigations.

That said, he clearly committed obstruction, and if the Dems go forward, that's what they'll start with.
Click to expand...

They have already started with making crap up. So what?
 
CharacterAssassin said:
I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me.

It's their way of saying they're my bitch.

Fun!!!!
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
As the Democrat wannabe candidates vie for the presidential nomination ---they will start investigating each other.

"Oh no ... after you".

"Oh no ... after you".
 
Ya'll already paying a "spending Tax" with your "after tax money" each time you try to spend it!

LOL.

I know mafia schemes when I see one!
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Which is all wholly irrelevant to the fact that Trump, his family, his business, his campaign and his inauguration are all still under 20 separate federal and state investigations.

That said, he clearly committed obstruction, and if the Dems go forward, that's what they'll start with.
Click to expand...

What obstruction was committed—lawfully firing Comey?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top