Investigating the investigators? Why not?

The Steel dossier, Strzok & Page emails, the Comey memo exonerating Hillary Clinton before she was even interviewed, testimony that Rosenstein offered to wear a wire to trap the President, the known evidence that the FBI was spying on Trump and his campaign members without a legal warrant, FISA court abuse, emails proving that Andrew McCabe held meetings in his office to conspire against Trump ever becoming President and instituting an "insurance policy" to remove him after he got elected, Clinton acid washing her server and having blackberries and other electronic mobile devices smashed up, the involvement of the intel agencies Clapper and others involvement in the coup-de-qua to exonerate Hillary Clinton of felonies & frame Donald Trump. NO EVIDENCE? You're kidding, right?????

giphy.gif
 
Indictments, guilty pleas and convictions would be proof it wasn't a witch hunt. Your argument would lead to the ridiculous assumption that every time police and prosecutors get a conviction we need to investigate them because they weren't doing their job.

They had NOTHING to do with the purpose of the investigation which was conspiracy between the Trump campaign and DA Russians you moron.
 
Remember that Mueller never looked into the illegal Clinton exoneration by his pal Comey, nor did he look at the COLLUSION by Clinton and the DNC with the Russians, the Steel dossier and the truck load of evidence gathered by the House and Senate investigations showing the illegal exoneration of Clinton & the spying on Trump and a coup-de-qua to frame and remove Trump.

Let the real and legitimate investigation begin! Lawyer up lefties!!!!!!!

Something else stuck me about what was lacking in Mueller's investigation; the fact that his department was leaking like a sieve to the NYT's and he did and said NOTHING about it. Even in his report.

He said NOTHING about the FBI cabal or looked into the corrupt FISA warrants.
 
Sorry dumb f**k, but an investigation is an investigation. Now, go back to your corner, and suck on your thumb some more. At least Obama had the guts to actually testify, and turn over information unlike your spineless leader.

I do wish you had a brain, some self awareness and an IQ above room temperature. Really I do. :laugh:
 
I am all for it, they should launch yet another investigation into Hillary Clinton, its worked well for the Republican party over the last 20 years.

Republicans have been investigating Hillary over the last 20 years? STFU!!! :laugh:

They never found ANYTHING,

LIE and LAME. SO you're okay with high level Government officials using unsecured private e-mail servers in order to hide from public scrutiny? Yes or NO?

Are you also okay with those high level individuals destroying evidence while under investigation? Yes or NO?

Are you also okay with these high level individuals transmitting classified documents using their unsecured e-mail servers and then lying about it? Yes or NO?

but it seems to work and they all seem to believe she is guilty of everything from murder to embezzlement to selling America's uranium stores to Russia. Keep that gravy train going.

It seems to me that you are only concerned about our laws when it is a Republican. If it is a Democrat, you suddenly go deaf, dumb and blind. Why is that?

Here is what I expect from you in response to all this:

giphy.gif
 
But there is.

No, there isn't, nor can you demonstrate otherwise.
The collusion accusation itself was fabricated. The people that introduced it are known. Some of the funding for it is known. The process crimes are real. The instances of broken privacy laws are real. The abuse of citizens of the United States by the investigation team is real.

No, it wasn't fabricated and no one was abused. You simply stomping your tiny feet and screaming that it's true won't magically make it true, simp.
Even the argument presented by Robo is a real and valid argument. It contains no fallacy. You, on the other hand, have made an argument of the stone fallacy and an insult fallacy.

Newp. Haven't offered either fallacy, nor can you demonstrate that I have.

Literally nothing he posted was real or valid.

This seems really, really difficult for you.
 
The Steel dossier, Strzok & Page emails, the Comey memo exonerating Hillary Clinton before she was even interviewed, testimony that Rosenstein offered to wear a wire to trap the President, the known evidence that the FBI was spying on Trump and his campaign members without a legal warrant, FISA court abuse, emails proving that Andrew McCabe held meetings in his office to conspire against Trump ever becoming President and instituting an "insurance policy" to remove him after he got elected, Clinton acid washing her server and having blackberries and other electronic mobile devices smashed up, the involvement of the intel agencies Clapper and others involvement in the coup-de-qua to exonerate Hillary Clinton of felonies & frame Donald Trump. NO EVIDENCE? You're kidding, right?????

None of that is credible evidence of your asinine claims, silly whore, and most of it is pure fantasy. "FISA abuse'?!?!? What a sucker.

And your instance that there was a coup is simply more evidence that you're desperately pulling things straight out of your ass in an attempt to distract from the fact that you have nothing.

Christ, have you always been this stupid?

It's really got to sting for you, considering the current active 20 state and federal investigations into Trump, his family, his admin, his businesses and his inauguration.

To say nothing for the clear case that he committed obstruction.
 
Sorry dumb f**k, but an investigation is an investigation. Now, go back to your corner, and suck on your thumb some more. At least Obama had the guts to actually testify, and turn over information unlike your spineless leader.

Testify to what? What is there to testify to?
 
Because I know it gets under his skin.

You, being a moron, aren't expected to understand that, honey.

How could you know? You can't see my posts; but trust me when I say it doesn't. It makes me laugh at what an ignorant buffoon you are. Next you'll pretend you didn't read this too!! :laugh:
 
None of that is credible evidence of your asinine claims, silly whore, and most of it is pure fantasy. "FISA abuse'?!?!? What a sucker.

And your instance that there was a coup is simply more evidence that you're desperately pulling things straight out of your ass in an attempt to distract from the fact that you have nothing.

Christ, have you always been this stupid?

It's really got to sting for you, considering the current active 20 state and federal investigations into Trump, his family, his admin, his businesses and his inauguration.

To say nothing for the clear case that he committed obstruction.

:lolup:Triggered. Dumb. Pathetic. :laugh:
 
I am all for it, they should launch yet another investigation into Hillary Clinton, its worked well for the Republican party over the last 20 years. They never found ANYTHING, but it seems to work and they all seem to believe she is guilty of everything from murder to embezzlement to selling America's uranium stores to Russia. Keep that gravy train going.

She has done both.

She has also published state secrets, obstructed justice by tampering with evidence, committed perjury, defended Bill's sex escapades, and colluded with Russia.
 
Something else stuck me about what was lacking in Mueller's investigation; the fact that his department was leaking like a sieve to the NYT's and he did and said NOTHING about it. Even in his report.

He said NOTHING about the FBI cabal or looked into the corrupt FISA warrants.

Which itself is illegal.
 
Back
Top