Actually, no, you're challenging the assertion that anything we do can have an impact on global warming whatsoever -- one might say "stem it to the smallest degree."
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
IPCC Part II
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Actually, no, you're challenging the assertion that anything we do can have an impact on global warming whatsoever -- one might say "stem it to the smallest degree."
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Actually, no, you're challenging the assertion that anything we do can have an impact on global warming whatsoever -- one might say "stem it to the smallest degree."
Well, I'd go along with that, as well.
Do you really understand how global warming works? How much of a difference do you think America can make if it takes us decades to get off of carbon, and then even if we do that, the emissions of other countries offsets that in 4 years, and emissions continue to grow?
Seriously? Post a witty video or something, because there is no rational answer to that.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Well, I'd go along with that, as well.
Do you really understand how global warming works? How much of a difference do you think America can make if it takes us decades to get off of carbon, and then even if we do that, the emissions of other countries offsets that in 4 years, and emissions continue to grow?
Seriously? Post a witty video or something, because there is no rational answer to that.
This probably explains the persistence of various greenhouse gasses, although I do find it amusing that they calculate the lifetime for N2O as exactly 114 years.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/jan/16/greenhouse-gases-remain-air
Last edited:
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
So that's it? No one has anything aside from "we should just make huge sacrifices and lose jobs because it's a good thing to do. I can't define how good, or even if it will really change anything, but we should just do it anyway"?
That's the best the IA crowd has?
That's the best the IA crowd has?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
All these otherwise great threads, ruined by Oncelor going insane....a mind really is a terrible thing to waste.
Well, I'm sure you'd prefer the usual echo chamber where you go completely unchallenged.
Because when you're challenged? Well, brother - you don't have a heck of a lot of info to back yourself up, despite those years of study.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Well, I'm sure you'd prefer the usual echo chamber where you go completely unchallenged.
Because when you're challenged? Well, brother - you don't have a heck of a lot of info to back yourself up, despite those years of study.
Never has the saying "empty vessels make the most noise" been truer.
Last edited:
Never was the saying "empty vessels make the most noise" been true
Are you even English? You certainly can't write it.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Are you even English? You certainly can't write it.
I will allow your Cadmean victory.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?54262-IPCC-Part-II&p=1296479#post1296479
I will allow your Cadmean victory.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?54262-IPCC-Part-II&p=1296479#post1296479
Thanks for allowing me to point out that your falsehood was written incorrectly.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Thanks for allowing me to point out that your falsehood was written incorrectly.
The grammar was incorrect, the statement stands.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
The grammar was incorrect, the statement stands.
It's a statement of pure projection.