Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
In some states killing unborn fetuses is murder.
...and you want to make it all states. Yes, very authoritarian of you just like the fucking Democrats and guns.
In some states killing unborn fetuses is murder.
I like California a hell of a lot more than I like Middle America, but I've always lived near the shore [albeit the other one].
The term limits on the presidency were put during my lifetime.
I. like all first wave boomers, was born in what would have been FDR's fourth term if he hadn't recently died.
I don't like term limits, nor do I see any need for them. If we ever find another FDR, I want him/her to serve until he/she dies as well.
We have elections. We can limit terms without any mandates.
What's the orangutan doing these days?
It was cited the FIRST time I posted in in this thread I guess you didn't read the thread you are participating in. The point is an unborn fetus embryo etc is a HUMAN BEING. The term baby isn't really an exact scientific unborn fetuses are referred to as babies every day in hospitals around the country. Poll woman and ask if the fetus moving in their abdomen is a human baby and see what they would say.Your quote (uncited of course) is the author (unknown at this point) claiming that Matthews-Ross's statement mean its a baby, this is hardly authoritative or of substance.
This type of failure to read critically is how you fools get duped.
Agreed. Just like when the citified gunless force their way of life on a rural resident like myself.![]()
Its good enough for woke California....and you want to make it all states. Yes, very authoritarian of you just like the fucking Democrats and guns.
Even physicians and others with scientific education can select sources that confirm their bias, eh?
OBs refer to the developing fetus as a "baby" when speaking to the parents. Otherwise, in charting, it is referred to as "the fetus." OB nurses do the same; in charting it is often referred to as "the passenger."
And this right here is the problem with trying to have a rational discussion about gun regulations with the irrational. You all instantly jump to the erroneous conclusion that a regulation equates to confiscation. It does not. Never has, most likely never will.
What Harvard isn't good enough for you?Even physicians and others with scientific education can select sources that confirm their bias, eh?
OBs refer to the developing fetus as a "baby" when speaking to the parents. Otherwise, in charting, it is referred to as "the fetus." OB nurses do the same; in charting it is often referred to as "the passenger."
It was cited the FIRST time I posted in in this thread I guess you didn't read the thread you are participating in. The point is an unborn fetus embryo etc is a HUMAN BEING. The term baby isn't really an exact scientific unborn fetuses are referred to as babies every day in hospitals around the country. Poll woman and ask if the fetus moving in their abdomen is a human baby and see what they would say.
Its good enough for woke California.
Hello Jarod,
I concur.
There is no such thing as an 'unborn baby.'
Even physicians and others with scientific education can select sources that confirm their bias, eh?
OBs refer to the developing fetus as a "baby" when speaking to the parents. Otherwise, in charting, it is referred to as "the fetus." OB nurses do the same; in charting it is often referred to as "the passenger."
Language use is not something that is precise, but scientific and legal language need to be. When developing laws, or debating them, we should use the precise language.
Fantastic. I didn't know or care. Only going by the end results.
For now, the Republicans are continuing to fuck up leaving the US stuck with the Democrats. Harris will probably not only be the first female President, but she'll probably be a 10 year President under the 22nd and 25th Amendments.
The one thing that could fuck that up is if Biden became incapacitated before his third year. It's possible that Harris would only be "Acting President" and that the Democratic Senate and the Democratic House wouldn't use the 25th Amendment until she was inside the two year window.
Hey Doc. where are you getting your statistics
https://www.city-journal.org/html/hard-data-hollow-protests-15458.htmlWho is killing these black victims? Not whites, and not the police, but other blacks. In 2016, the police fatally shot 233 blacks, the vast majority armed and dangerous, according to the Washington Post. The Post categorized only 16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest. Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer. Black males have made up 42 percent of all cop-killers over the last decade, though they are only 6 percent of the population. That 18.5 ratio undoubtedly worsened in 2016, in light of the 53 percent increase in gun murders of officers—committed vastly and disproportionately by black males. Among all homicide suspects whose race was known, white killers of blacks numbered only 243.
What Harvard isn't good enough for you?
Agreed. Just like when the citified gunless force their way of life on a rural resident like myself.![]()
I noticed Harris quickly backed away from being in charge of the border immigration fiasco. She didn't want to be in charge of it after Biden announced she was going to be in charge of it.I suspect they will be able to keep Biden going for the next 4 years. Its amazing what they can do. I doubt Harris will get elected, but who knows that far off. She is a good choice, not liberal enough for me, but liberal enough for me results in not being able to accomplish anything.
Because bad people don't care if they kill a cop.If your statistics are true, why do you think it is that way?