Is Climate Change Possible Redux

Into the Night said:
You aren't asking any questions. You are only mindlessly repeating yourself.
Click to expand...
I've asked the same question multiple times. The fact that neither of you will answer them isn't my issue, nor does it mean I'm not asking.

You're answering the question you want me to ask which is "Is there a single measure of health", which is not what I asked.

There isn't a single measure of pain, but being poked with a needle and shit in the foot produce different levels of pain.

So, ready to stop playing dumb?
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
I never said ...
Click to expand...
You lose. You make many errors via implication, and saying "I never said ..." does not delete the erroneous implication.

Your position, either through direct statement or through implication, is that earth has the magick superpower to create energy out of nothing, in direct violation of thermodynamics. You do this by claiming an increase in Earth's average global equilibrium temperature without any additional energy.

Violation. Not possible. You lose.
 
ZenMode said:
I've asked the same question multiple times. The fact that neither of you will answer them isn't my issue, nor does it mean I'm not asking.

You're answering the question you want me to ask which is "Is there a single measure of health", which is not what I asked.

There isn't a single measure of pain, but being poked with a needle and shit in the foot produce different levels of pain.

So, ready to stop playing dumb?
Click to expand...
America rejects your lies, sorry green Nazi.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
Zen I would recommend that you not exhaust yourself with Into the Night, something wrong with that guy's thought process.
Click to expand...
Except that Into the Night is correct. One thing that both ZenMode and yourself could do is actually allow him to point you in the right direction and then perform your own independent research. Now, ZenMode won't do any research and he won't ever be honest, but there's nothing stopping you from learning. Take advantage of the free information.
 
Lao Tse said:
we know zenmode is fake conservative never trumper infiltrator. fuck his climate lies. fuck the green agenda. zenmode is dumb.
Click to expand...
ZenMode is dishonest, and desperate. He has too much emotional equity invested in his WACKY, science-defying religion to allow his fragile bubble to be burst. This is why he is persistent in his chanting of questions that have already been answered many times.
 
ZenMode said:
So, if a person goes from being young strong disease and injury-free, to old and on their deathbed from stage 4 cancer, ...
Click to expand...
Stupid people have difficulty with this concept, as well as with the concept of emissivity, and with the concepts of closed systems and measured constants.

If you generally charaterize the health of person A, and then later generally characterize the health of different person B, has his health changed?

If you recognize this as being your stupid question, congratulations, the light bulb is starting to turn on.

Even though it's the same identity on a timeline, in your question you are nonetheless asking about assessing two different people at different times, Person A: a young man and Person B, an old man. The general assessment of health is relative and "at the moment." Two weeks after the old man beats cancer, the doctor happily tells him he's doing great, and the young man who is puking from drinking too much on a Friday night is wishing he were dead. If you can't quite grasp the concept, you're the problem/limiting factor. I will be reminding you of this concept when it becomes relevant in other topics you aren't able to understand.
 
besides, global warming is fine.

think of all the new farmland that will come available.

these green Nazis are just trying to austerity humanity.
 
IBDaMann said:
Stupid people have difficulty with this concept, as well as with the concept of emissivity, and with the concepts of closed systems and measured constants.

If you generally charaterize the health of person A, and then later generally characterize the health of different person B, has his health changed?

If you recognize this as being your stupid question, congratulations, the light bulb is starting to turn on.

Even though it's the same identity on a timeline, in your question you are nonetheless asking about assessing two different people at different times, Person A: a young man and Person B, an old man. The general assessment of health is relative and "at the moment." Two weeks after the old man beats cancer, the doctor happily tells him he's doing great, and the young man who is puking from drinking too much on a Friday night is wishing he were dead. If you can't quite grasp the concept, you're the problem/limiting factor. I will be reminding you of this concept when it becomes relevant in other topics you aren't able to understand.
Click to expand...
it is time to just start calling them stupid.

you nailed it.
 
IBDaMann said:
You lose. You make many errors via implication, and saying "I never said ..." does not delete the erroneous implication.

Your position, either through direct statement or through implication, is that earth has the magick superpower to create energy out of nothing, in direct violation of thermodynamics. You do this by claiming an increase in Earth's average global equilibrium temperature without any additional energy.

Violation. Not possible. You lose.
Click to expand...
Nope. Stop lying.
  • Does a blanket create energy?
  • Does a greenhouse creates energy?
  • Does the insulation in your house create energy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top