Is Climate Change Possible Redux

Daylight63 said:
Why are you here? Honest question. YOu can't be as stupid as your posts indicate. Otherwise you couldn't even turn on the computer. So why are you here posting?
Click to expand...
waking up humanity to the evils of the deep state globalist fiat currency war machine eugenics Nazis like you.

you're outgunned, evil dipshit.

most of the boys here are with me.

you're the one who's mad.

we're taking it to the ballot box.

:truestory:
 
Lao Tse said:
waking up humanity to the evils of the deep state globalist fiat currency war machine eugenics Nazis like you.

you're outgunned, evil dipshit.

most of the boys here are with me.

you're the one who's mad.

we're taking it to the ballot box.

:truestory:
Click to expand...

So no answer? Got it.

Probably not going to engage you on much more. You aren't worth the effort. You can't read or you are on here having a laugh. Why you would consider it fun is beyond me (or anyone else without head trauma)
 
Daylight63 said:
So no answer? Got it.

Probably not going to engage you on much more. You aren't worth the effort. You can't read or you are on here having a laugh. Why you would consider it fun is beyond me (or anyone else without head trauma)
Click to expand...
I'm stopping Nazis like you.

that's the answer.

And you're running away because I beat you so bad at thinking and you're a little bitch.

run, Suzy, run!
 
Last edited:
Lao Tse said:
many of the changes made to election rules in 2020 were unconstitutional, as they were not approved by the state legislatures.

technically legally the entire 2020 election is legally invalid.
Click to expand...
If they were determined to be unconstitutional, then you undo those changes for the next election. People like Trump intended on getting votes cast by legally registered voters nullified so he could win the election. Do you have an issue with that?
 
ZenMode said:
If they were determined to be unconstitutional, then you undo those changes for the next election. People like Trump intended on getting votes cast by legally registered voters nullified so he could win the election. Do you have an issue with that?
Click to expand...
no he didn't.

that's just what you trump deranged keep saying.
 
Lao Tse said:
no he didn't.

that's just what you trump deranged keep saying.
Click to expand...
Yes he did. That was 100% his intention, you fool. He was trying to get votes thrown out in certain areas based on the fact that they were cast in a manner that was unconstitutional. That was the entire purpose of the lawsuits. They weren't for fun. It was to reverse the results of the election, just like his call to Georgia. For God's sake, pull your head out....

President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to block millions of votes from four battleground states that voted for President-elect Joe Biden.

Trump’s request came in a filing with the court asking to intervene in a lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking to invalidate millions of votes cast in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The President is being represented by a new attorney, John Eastman, who is known for recently pushing a racist conspiracy theory questioning whether Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was eligible for the role because her parents were immigrants.

The move from Trump comes just a day after the high court denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth’s election results. The one-line order was issued with no noted dissents or comment from any of the nine justices.

The President for weeks has pushed increasingly desperate appeals and baseless conspiracy theories about his second term being stolen.

“Our Country is deeply divided in ways that it arguably has not been seen since the election of 1860,” the petition states. “There is a high level of distrust between the opposing sides, compounded by the fact that, in the election just held, election officials in key swing states, for apparently partisan advantage, failed to conduct their state elections in compliance with state election law.”

Echoing arguments made by Texas, Trump says the battleground states used the pandemic “as an excuse” and “ignored or suspended the operation of numerous state laws designed to protect the integrity of the ballot.”

He asks the court to block the states from using “constitutionally infirm 2020 election results” unless the legislatures of the states “review the 2020 election results.”

 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
Yes he did. That was 100% his intention, you fool. He was trying to get votes thrown out in certain areas based on the fact that they were cast in a manner that was unconstitutional. That was the entire purpose of the lawsuits. They weren't for fun. It was to reverse the results of the election, just like his call to Georgia. For God's sake, pull your head out....

President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to block millions of votes from four battleground states that voted for President-elect Joe Biden.

Trump’s request came in a filing with the court asking to intervene in a lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking to invalidate millions of votes cast in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The President is being represented by a new attorney, John Eastman, who is known for recently pushing a racist conspiracy theory questioning whether Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was eligible for the role because her parents were immigrants.

The move from Trump comes just a day after the high court denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth’s election results. The one-line order was issued with no noted dissents or comment from any of the nine justices.

The President for weeks has pushed increasingly desperate appeals and baseless conspiracy theories about his second term being stolen.

“Our Country is deeply divided in ways that it arguably has not been seen since the election of 1860,” the petition states. “There is a high level of distrust between the opposing sides, compounded by the fact that, in the election just held, election officials in key swing states, for apparently partisan advantage, failed to conduct their state elections in compliance with state election law.”

Echoing arguments made by Texas, Trump says the battleground states used the pandemic “as an excuse” and “ignored or suspended the operation of numerous state laws designed to protect the integrity of the ballot.”

He asks the court to block the states from using “constitutionally infirm 2020 election results” unless the legislatures of the states “review the 2020 election results.”
Click to expand...
oh just stop it please.

you're such a deep state ass-tard.

this is why you're losing.

:truestory:
 
Lao Tse said:
oh just stop it please.

you're such a deep state ass-tard.

this is why you're losing.

:truestory:
Click to expand...
What was the point of all the lawsuits and appealing to SCOTUS if not to change the result of the election, you dunce? Was it for funsies?
 
Lao Tse said:
this is why you're losing.
Click to expand...
Better luck next time

giphy.gif
 
Daylight63 said:
Why are you here? Honest question. YOu can't be as stupid as your posts indicate.
Click to expand...
Why are you here? Honest question. Are you really as stupid as your posts indicate?

You are scientifically illiterate and mathematically incompetent, you aren't here to learn from all the people who are much smarter than you.

Why are you here?
 
IBDaMann said:
Yes, my own observations.


Nope.


Great, since we have already discussed them exhaustively, with quotes and links provided, go back to those posts so you can read them.
Click to expand...
You provided one affidavit from one person who thought he had ballots on his truck, but never delivered them anywhere and ended up taking them back to where he got them. Surely you have more than that. You're claiming certainty of a stolen election based on that?
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
You provided one affidavit from one person
Click to expand...
Nope. Go back to those posts and refresh your memory ... and feel free to read thousands more, to your heart's content. Don't feel as though you somehow need my permission to read any affidavit.

... and remember, they are eye-witnesses and you simply didn't pay attention.
 
ZenMode said:
You provided one affidavit from one person who thought he had ballots on his truck, but never delivered them anywhere and ended up taking them back to where he got them. Surely you have more than that. You're claiming certainty of a stolen election based on that?
Click to expand...
that's called first hand and eyewitness testimony, ya dumb cunt.
 
IBDaMann said:
Nope. Go back to those posts and refresh your memory ... and feel free to read thousands more, to your heart's content. Don't feel as though you somehow need my permission to read any affidavit.

... and remember, they are eye-witnesses and you simply didn't pay attention.
Click to expand...
How many people watched the video in Georgia and thoughts they were witnessing election fraud?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top