Is FoxNews biased?

Lush Limpballs tells lies.

Maybe lies fly with right wingers.

See, the leftists also have to rely on name-calling, because the only way they can win an argument is through dehumanising and demonising an opponent, rather than discuss the issue at hand.
 
The war that I have seen opposed by almost every network?

The major topic aside from the War in Afghanistan prior to the Iraq War was the build-up to the Iraq War. Was the media not going to cover it?

I went to three anti-war protests (prior to the Iraq War) in San Francisco (to observe) and saw all three reported by the national media along with numerous other protests around the country.

Sure I get upset when I don't think the media is reporting something the way I would like it seen reported but that doesn't mean the media is reporting irresponsibly or is wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The war that I have seen opposed by almost every network?

The major topic aside from the War in Afghanistan prior to the Iraq War was the build-up to the Iraq War. Was the media not going to cover it?

I went to three anti-war protests (prior to the Iraq War) in San Francisco (to observe) and saw all three reported by the national media along with numerous other protests around the country.

Sure I get upset when I don't think the media is reporting something the way I would like it seen reported but that doesn't mean the media is reporting irresponsibly or is wrong.

I too saw plenty of anti-war coverage and "doom and gloom" reports on the situation in Iraq...in fact, I'm trying to think of one pro-war newscast to support Desh's opinion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guys you have bought into the whole packaged designed to control the news by the people who have HUGE amounts of cash.

The consolidation of the media is and was designed to control what Americans hear.

They fired people who spoke out against the war and did not report the evidence which prooved the War in Iraq was full of shit.

The effect is now apparent.

Rs won elections and were wrong about nearly everything they said. They are either stupid as hell or a pack of liars. I chose the pack of liars option.


If the media was left biased you would not have a country which is now realising the right lied to them at every turn. The media which is corporate owned backed their favorites and helped create the mess which is now the US policy.

Funny how you are silly enough to think the media killed its own chioces for office?

Follow the money and realise what the result was.

Its obvious to anyone with an ability to think clearly.
 
The media as a whole in no way leans right--- you are a fucking retard if you believe that...it may not be quite as socialist as you would prefer, but by no means is it right-leaning.


Lets remember who called names first Mr "jounalist".

You lean pretty right now dont you?



Damo lets see the study?
 
Um, yes. Fox News is biased.

As is MSNBC the anti-Fox... Studies, not made or paid for by the "corporate media" consistently show that there is bias towards the left in the more mainstream media...

Pretty much there is a bias in both directions towards power.


MSNBC has olberman. That's it. He's the only progressive voice on there. Otherwise, MSNBC's lineup is pretty much conservatives and centrists, from Tucker, to Scarbourough, to Mathews.
 
Lets remember who called names first Mr "jounalist".

You lean pretty right now dont you?



Damo lets see the study?

Not sure what a "jounalist" is, but yes, I am basically a libertarian fascist (wihch I would be happy to explain in a different thread).

However, I would get fired in about 5 seconds if I ever put my personal feelings into a piece over the company-line. I was even talking about this the other day to a friend of mine; her boss was fired recently for not enforcing the company-slant to the news.

There are plenty of right-wing workers in the journalism industry, to be sure, but you will never hear from them and you will never hear how they feel.
 
Guys you have bought into the whole packaged designed to control the news by the people who have HUGE amounts of cash.

The consolidation of the media is and was designed to control what Americans hear.

They fired people who spoke out against the war and did not report the evidence which prooved the War in Iraq was full of shit.

The effect is now apparent.

Rs won elections and were wrong about nearly everything they said. They are either stupid as hell or a pack of liars. I chose the pack of liars option.


If the media was left biased you would not have a country which is now realising the right lied to them at every turn. The media which is corporate owned backed their favorites and helped create the mess which is now the US policy.

Funny how you are silly enough to think the media killed its own chioces for office?

Follow the money and realise what the result was.

Its obvious to anyone with an ability to think clearly.


When we talk about the media's left-leaning bias we are talking about a three to four decade time period.

As to the Iraq War specifically major Democrats both voted for and supported the Iraq War at the start.

As Gonzo and I have both stated if you are coming from such a far left position then yes we agree the media would seem biased to the right to you. However I have seen you defend the Democrats when blackascoal has attacked them from the left. So I don't know where your true position lies.

Phil Donahue was let go because his ratings sucked. Even if they were rising they were still so low that no one would have kept him. Sure he has fans like you but that is obviously a small group.
 
Let me ask you this: why doesn't Alan Colmes have his own televison show? Hannity has "Hannity & Colmes," "Hannity's America" and doesn't he also have a radio show? :rolleyes: I guess Alan just gets the stappler.
 
Um, yes. Fox News is biased.

As is MSNBC the anti-Fox... Studies, not made or paid for by the "corporate media" consistently show that there is bias towards the left in the more mainstream media...

Pretty much there is a bias in both directions towards power.

Damo, as if having an MSNBC gives the left anything. MSNBC should not be compared to CNN and Fox... it should be compared to Headline News. It's ratings are atrocious. It's like a website with a cable show.
 
Not sure what a "jounalist" is, but yes, I am basically a libertarian fascist (wihch I would be happy to explain in a different thread).

However, I would get fired in about 5 seconds if I ever put my personal feelings into a piece over the company-line. I was even talking about this the other day to a friend of mine; her boss was fired recently for not enforcing the company-slant to the news.

There are plenty of right-wing workers in the journalism industry, to be sure, but you will never hear from them and you will never hear how they feel.



However, I would get fired in about 5 seconds if I ever put my personal feelings into a piece over the company-line. I was even talking about this the other day to a friend of mine; her boss was fired recently for not enforcing the company-slant to the news.

The company that owns NBC is mega-defense contractor General Electric, and Viacom owns CBS. I think the CEO of Viacom endorsed Bush in 2004.
 
LMAO...........

When we talk about the media's left-leaning bias we are talking about a three to four decade time period.

As to the Iraq War specifically major Democrats both voted for and supported the Iraq War at the start.

As Gonzo and I have both stated if you are coming from such a far left position then yes we agree the media would seem biased to the right to you. However I have seen you defend the Democrats when blackascoal has attacked them from the left. So I don't know where your true position lies.

Phil Donahue was let go because his ratings sucked. Even if they were rising they were still so low that no one would have kept him. Sure he has fans like you but that is obviously a small group.


Desh is from Vegas...what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas...that includes posting while high on Coors Beer...then again maybe not...:D
 
Guys you have bought into the whole packaged designed to control the news by the people who have HUGE amounts of cash.
Guys, we should just give up. She's right and we are wrong, obviously. I mean, she keeps saying we are wrong and that she is the most intelligent person here (sorry human race), so it must be so!

The consolidation of the media is and was designed to control what Americans hear.
This sounds like something that you heard off a blog and have embraced without ever analysing...please tell me exactly what this sentence means, and be specific.

They fired people who spoke out against the war and did not report the evidence which prooved the War in Iraq was full of shit.
Um, sure. Or, perhaps almost all of the media spoke out against the war, so that when they actually fired someone they had no option but to fire an anti-war reporter....This is like saying that if the KKK kicked out a member for whatever reason, the real reason that the member was ejected was due to his whiteness....which is obviously just silly.

The effect is now apparent.
Is it?

Rs won elections
Like the Congressional elections, right?
and were wrong about nearly everything they said.
Such as?
They are either stupid as hell or a pack of liars. I chose the pack of liars option.
Which is clearly going to cloud your judgment...you should assume a neutral standpoint as judge as each one comes to you, otherwise you become the partisan hack that pretty much defines you on this site.


If the media was left biased you would not have a country which is now realising the right lied to them at every turn.
Or, could it be that the country doesn't pay attention to uncredible blogs, and that the mainstream media (because of a thing called ethics) is required to actually back up the stories they report, which naturally excludes the more Area 51/conspiracy nutjob stories that I am sure you are looking for.

The media which is corporate owned backed their favorites and helped create the mess which is now the US policy.
Yeah, the media obviously loves George Bush....can I buy some of that acid?



Follow the money and realise what the result was.
I doubt you could follow the money for my groceries, much less the complexities of political/corporate intrigue.

Its obvious to anyone with an ability to think clearly.
If you are the future of rationality, I will gladly remain among the ignorant, reactionary masses.
 
Let me ask you this: why doesn't Alan Colmes have his own televison show? Hannity has "Hannity & Colmes," "Hannity's America" and doesn't he also have a radio show? :rolleyes: I guess Alan just gets the stappler.

The audience at Hannity & Colmes is all conservative. It's like "Hannity and that other dude".
 
LOL! That's hilarious and pathetic.

On FOX you get both left and right wing views. While many of their most popular hosts are Conservative they certainly allow both sides their time to speak, and that's why liberals absolutely hate FOX news, they're only satisfied if their point is the only view expressed. I swear MSNBC, you get literally half of every story, it's laughable.
 
However, I would get fired in about 5 seconds if I ever put my personal feelings into a piece over the company-line. I was even talking about this the other day to a friend of mine; her boss was fired recently for not enforcing the company-slant to the news.

The company that owns NBC is mega-defense contractor General Electric, and Viacom owns CBS. I think the CEO of Viacom endorsed Bush in 2004.

General Electric is obviously only a defense contractor, and who the fuck watches CBS?
 
Exactly. You tell the facts of the story and then you can argue about it but you can't make up reality and what's going on. Fox "news" is a propoganda network and it's pathetic.

First off, the liberal opinion is always portrayed by a fucking idiot. Colmes is one of the dumbest people on the planet. He only shows up at the studio as fodder to have the all white all conservative audience laugh at him.

Second, there are more than two possible ways to look at an issue.

Third, there is supposed to be NO BIAS. ONLY THE FACTS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PRESENTED. Giving one side of the story, and then a shitty strawman version made up by someone posing as a centrist Democratic, doesn't make up for that.
 
The media has turned on Bush now because the population has turned against Bush.

They exsist only to make money remember?

They have all lost viewership except the shows that go after Bush like Olberman.

They are begining to turn to their money source.

They still are by and large right leaning with a show or two leaning left like Olberman. Its really leaning truth and not left but the truth has a left wing bias.
 
Back
Top