Is Trump Really on Track to Win Re-Election?

Which is not the same thing as "majority support".
"Majority support" does not solely apply to popular vote. It applies to any vote, including the electoral college vote (which is the applicable vote with regard to the Presidency). Stop speaking Liberal and start speaking English.

The Electoral College was designed so that the popular vote wouldn't matter.
There is no "popular vote" for President besides the Electoral College vote. That is where there is "majority support".

Complete BS. You are trying to hide your denial behind the Constitution.
The Constitution is the law of the land, you dumbass...

More denial. The whole point of voter ID laws is to make it harder to register to vote.
WRONG. The whole point is to make it harder to cast votes illegally. It is just as easy to register as it has always been. How hard is it to identify yourself?

Except that we're talking about thousands, not zero.
No, we're talking about zero voters. No voters were suppressed.

You know what cheating. Like all liars and cheaters, all you can do is deny and deflect.
Inversion Fallacy.

No, they cheated. And they lost big time in the midterms because they cheated in 2016. People, other than the sheep like you, are sick and tired of the right-wing hypocrisy and corruption.
What "cheating"? Not interested in your bigotry, either.
 
"Majority support" does not solely apply to popular vote. It applies to any vote, including the electoral college vote (which is the applicable vote with regard to the Presidency). Stop speaking Liberal and start speaking English.


There is no "popular vote" for President besides the Electoral College vote. That is where there is "majority support".


The Constitution is the law of the land, you dumbass...


WRONG. The whole point is to make it harder to cast votes illegally. It is just as easy to register as it has always been. How hard is it to identify yourself?


No, we're talking about zero voters. No voters were suppressed.


Inversion Fallacy.


What "cheating"? Not interested in your bigotry, either.

Yes there is a popular vote for president. It is basic and extremely important. The person with the most popular votes in a state is awarded the electoral votes. The popular vote , therefore, is what determines the election.
 
The Constitution is not a "fix". It is the ruling document of the USA. The USA is a Federated Republic.
Correct. The USA is not a Democracy. It is a Federated Republic. The USA does have democratically elected representatives, however.
Most times, polls simply tell you what whoever conducted the poll wants you to believe (by means of skewing the results due to improper methodology).

That US Constitution as a ruling document has been worthless according to Rehnquist's SCOTUS Bicentennial Reichquest as evidenced by all those thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament arsonists immaculate drug conception standing certifying election fixes, just as KKK Lynching Enforcement immaculate voting ballot theft conception for a Constitution 9/11 fix in those burning Bush's 9/11 Al Qaeda health care plan business of demagoguery patriot act elected hanging chads against Gore methodology .
 
Yes there is a popular vote for president. It is basic and extremely important.
Yes. That is the Electoral College. They are the ones who vote for President. Stop attempting to ignore/destroy the Constitution and actually read it for a change...

The person with the most popular votes in a state is awarded the electoral votes.
Not how it works. Take a look at the 2016 election results, for example. Seven electors decided to vote for candidates other than the two primary candidates. A couple States, such as Maine, split by congressional district, so the person with the most State-wide popular votes might not get all the electoral support.

The popular vote , therefore, is what determines the election.
Yes, the popular vote of the Electoral College is what determines the election.
 
That US Constitution as a ruling document has been worthless according to Rehnquist's SCOTUS Bicentennial Reichquest as evidenced by all those thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament arsonists immaculate drug conception standing certifying election fixes, just as KKK Lynching Enforcement immaculate voting ballot theft conception for a Constitution 9/11 fix in those burning Bush's 9/11 Al Qaeda health care plan business of demagoguery patriot act elected hanging chads against Gore methodology .

Lay off the wacky weed, dude...
 
Lay off the wacky weed, dude...

More of those "serve the Pope or die" KKK political black bag antics of klues klucks duh klans onward Christian Soldiers crusade where even considering voting in Gore for President results in gore NYC & the Pentagon on 9/11 for some wacky burning Bush's "man is God" old testament rewrite with an Al Qaeda "death to the infidels" Islamidiotocracy dude.....
 
Yes. That is the Electoral College. They are the ones who vote for President. Stop attempting to ignore/destroy the Constitution and actually read it for a change...


Not how it works. Take a look at the 2016 election results, for example. Seven electors decided to vote for candidates other than the two primary candidates. A couple States, such as Maine, split by congressional district, so the person with the most State-wide popular votes might not get all the electoral support.


Yes, the popular vote of the Electoral College is what determines the election.

Wonder how all these EC worshippers would feel if the electoral voters in say half dozen States voted different than what the popular vote of their State dictated.

Nothing in the Constitution that says the appointed electors have to follow the vote of the State, so it would be interesting to see how those that think the popular vote doesn't matter would react if such did occur. Just wonder if they would still praise the EC
 
Wonder how all these EC worshippers would feel if the electoral voters in say half dozen States voted different than what the popular vote of their State dictated.

Nothing in the Constitution that says the appointed electors have to follow the vote of the State, so it would be interesting to see how those that think the popular vote doesn't matter would react if such did occur. Just wonder if they would still praise the EC

Those people probably wouldn't be happy, but it would be perfectly Constitutional nonetheless. Electors can vote for whoever they wish.
 
Those people probably wouldn't be happy, but it would be perfectly Constitutional nonetheless. Electors can vote for whoever they wish.

So if such occurred say twice in the next five elections and it determined the election would you still be hanging your hat on the value and supposed wisdom of the EC?
 
Yes. That is the Electoral College. They are the ones who vote for President. Stop attempting to ignore/destroy the Constitution and actually read it for a change...


Not how it works. Take a look at the 2016 election results, for example. Seven electors decided to vote for candidates other than the two primary candidates. A couple States, such as Maine, split by congressional district, so the person with the most State-wide popular votes might not get all the electoral support.


Yes, the popular vote of the Electoral College is what determines the election.

Several states Trump won by 1 percent or less and got all the electoral votes. That is anathema to a government of the people. It is a government of the electors who are beholden to nobody. They can actually decide to vote for someone else. It happens extremely rarely and is of no consequence. But they can and there is a danger that someday they can just ignore everything and pick a president on their own.
 
Trump is behind the top 5 Dems by double digits in recent polls. It is too soon to make a big deal over that, but it is not a good indicator for Trump. A poll can be ignored because it is too soon. However, a bunch of Dems leading a sitting president creates interest.
 
Were the Jews behind 9/11?

If this Christian Nation Christiananality pedophilia business claiming it's one nation under God impersonating Jews as being behind 9/11 it would certainly account for Rehnquist's immaculate drug conception standing for those burning Bush's KKK Federal Lynching churchstate of hate cops baptising thine eyes of one of Eisenhower's WW II Pentagon staff sergeants by urinations Freudian slip foreshadowing to maintain that Al Qaeda "death to the infidels" flying carpet terrorists more perfect union with "serve the Pope or die" & why electoral college vote fixing was for the current Islamidiotiocracy.
 
If this Christian Nation Christiananality pedophilia business claiming it's one nation under God impersonating Jews as being behind 9/11 it would certainly account for Rehnquist's immaculate drug conception standing for those burning Bush's KKK Federal Lynching churchstate of hate cops baptising thine eyes of one of Eisenhower's WW II Pentagon staff sergeants by urinations Freudian slip foreshadowing to maintain that Al Qaeda "death to the infidels" flying carpet terrorists more perfect union with "serve the Pope or die" & why electoral college vote fixing was for the current Islamidiotiocracy.

Just say it, you fag.
 
With an electoral college playing Chinese Checkers with votes as if it's only some meat market auction in putting up barriers & having it's lynching enforcement depriving people of votes in order to implement deep state master plan for party candidates as for a second coming thru 9/11 in survival of the fittest fascists so the Christian Nation can maintain it's federal perjury of one nation under God communism of Christianity certainly railroads elections on track to win.
Were you actually trying to say something or are you just high on something?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
"Majority support" does not solely apply to popular vote. It applies to any vote, including the electoral college vote (which is the applicable vote with regard to the Presidency). Stop speaking Liberal and start speaking English.


There is no "popular vote" for President besides the Electoral College vote. That is where there is "majority support".


The Constitution is the law of the land, you dumbass...


WRONG. The whole point is to make it harder to cast votes illegally. It is just as easy to register as it has always been. How hard is it to identify yourself?


No, we're talking about zero voters. No voters were suppressed.


Inversion Fallacy.


What "cheating"? Not interested in your bigotry, either.

You continue to demonstrate that you are just another right-wing sheep.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top