but that wasn't the argument presented by you.... you argued that having one's head cut off is a terrible and unnatural death.... what sort of death is being blown up by a missile that incincerates the restaurant you are dining in?
My argument is, there is a clear and decisive difference between acts of barbaric terrorism and legitimate military actions. For us, we view collateral damage as an unfortunate byproduct of war, and strive to avoid it at all costs... for them, collateral damage is the name of the game, and what they strive to achieve and hope to accomplish daily! They don't get all upset and start wringing their hands when they kill innocent people, WE DO, but it's what they LIVE for! They don't concern themselves with the rights of detainees in their custody, they exploit them every way they can, before they barbarically saw off their heads in front of a video camera while praising God! You want to somehow equate them with legitimate armed forces, trying to observe the Geneva Conventions, and fighting a typical conventional war.... it's illustrative of how profoundly different our views are, and what makes pinheads so vehemently anti-war. You simply can't comprehend the difference between the two actions, one is as bad as the other to you, and you can't see any difference.
Maine, I think that is as close as Dix is able to get to admitting he is wrong.
You know, if I didn't think it would be used against me, I would compile a list of all the times I've admitted I was wrong, and every time one of you twerps made this claim, I would do like Prissy, and post the list! Show me where I am "wrong" about something, and I will admit that I was wrong! It's really THAT simple! I am not going to ever start admitting I am wrong about things neither of us know with certainty, that would just be plain stupid.
