Damo, here is the text from Matthew:
Jesus at the Temple
12Jesus entered the temple area and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. 13"It is written," he said to them, " 'My house will be called a house of prayer,'[e] but you are making it a 'den of robbers.'[f]"
14The blind and the lame came to him at the temple, and he healed them. 15But when the chief priests and the teachers of the law saw the wonderful things he did and the children shouting in the temple area, "Hosanna to the Son of David," they were indignant.
16"Do you hear what these children are saying?" they asked him.
"Yes," replied Jesus, "have you never read,
" 'From the lips of children and infants
you have ordained praise'[g]?"
17And he left them and went out of the city to Bethany, where he spent the night.
What I need to do is find the other texts involved in the other Gospels to get the whole picture, which I am doing right now...brb...
"When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the Temple courts he found men selling cattle, sheep and doves and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords and drove all from the Temple, and both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. To those who sold doves he said: 'Get out of here.' (John 2:13-16)
It says, "and he made a whip out of cords and drove them from the temple"
Revolutionary itinerant philosopher who was diefied after his death by his followers.
no Damo, I finally found your passage that you are using from John 2:15 and it DOES NOT SAY THAT HE WHIPPED THE MONEY CHANGERS...
15So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.
Note!
That the whip used to chase out both sheep and cattle is in a separated part of the verse saying he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their temples.
I believe it is you that has misunderstood this passage.
either way, I can agree to disagree with you.
Luke 22:36: "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."
I will take the middle-ground here (between Damo and Care...) Jesus was neither a zealot nor a pacifist. He did become angry in the Temple as Damo pointed out, but it was righteous anger -- there was NO SIN in him becoming angry and using force.
Good verse.
brent,
here is the verse in context....
Luke
35Then Jesus asked them, "When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?"
"Nothing," they answered.
36He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. 37It is written: 'And he was numbered with the transgressors'; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment."
38The disciples said, "See, Lord, here are two swords."
"That is enough," he replied.
now , Jesus did say to them when they reported back, that they had in their posession 2 swords, and he replied, ''That is enough''...
he was not sending them to war with anyone, he was telling them to be prepared to defend themselves.
soooooo, what is it that makes this...''a great verse'' to you?
I believe you have misunderstood the passage. The comma separation denotes a new group that he also drove out. See the above post...
Previously you were attempting to say he didn't even HAVE a whip and because he was a carpenter on a donkey couldn't get one....
Now you are pretending that when he drove them out it was just the cattle and sheep...
Rubbish.
Read the article I posted. He was also clearly not telling them not to defend themselves.
You will also notice that in that article the whole of the scripture was listed. I am not avoiding the context, I include it in my interpretation.
no, previously, i was reading the scripture from Matthew, which mentioned no such thing.
my comment about him being a carpenter that carried no whips was absolutely correct and a deduction on my part, i admit.
when i found the more descriptive scripture in a passage in the gospel of john that was given on the site, i immediately thanked you for making me aware of it.
this passage confirmed he carried no whips with him to punish and chase PEOPLE or ANIMALS away with and that i was correct in my assumptions, because it noted that he had to make them.
and i was also correct in that it says NO WHERE in this scripture that he used these whips he made to strike by whipping the men, these money changers...it specifically says, at least in the New International version that i posted from that he used the whips to chase out, ''BOTH sheep and cattle... and
16To those who sold doves he said, "Get these out of here! How dare you turn my Father's house into a market!"
i am sorry you feel it is RUBBISH...let's just say, you are incorrect in prejudging such!!!!
care
and i was also correct in that it says NO WHERE in this scripture that he used these whips he made to strike by whipping the men, these money changers...it specifically says, at least in the New International version that i posted from that he used the whips to chase out, ''BOTH sheep and cattle... and