JPP Experts

Guille said:
I don't know who he is but I do know who he isn't. He isn't Alex Jones and he isn't Bill Hicks. He is definitely a CIA plant.
Click to expand...

He's Earl?

xXrKR0m.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
Damn man. It's worse than I thought! I'll ask Alex Jones.


IsehnSO.gif
Click to expand...

Alex Jones is proving himself to be an even bigger scumbag by refusing to pay the Sandy Hook families:
https://news.yahoo.com/sandy-hook-families-fighting-alex-144630329.html
Sandy Hook Families Are Fighting Alex Jones and the Bankruptcy System Itself
Infowars conspiracy broadcaster Alex Jones, who faces more than $1.4 billion in legal damages for defaming the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, has devised a new way to taunt them: wriggling out of paying them the money they are owed.

Jones, who has an estimated net worth as high as $270 million, declared both business and personal bankruptcy last year as the families won historic verdicts in two lawsuits over his lies about the 2012 shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

A New York Times review of financial documents and court records filed over the past year found that Jones has transferred millions of dollars in property, cash and business deals to family and friends, including to a new company run by his former personal trainer, all potentially out of reach of creditors. He has also spent heavily on luxuries, including $80,000 on a private jet, bodyguards and a rented villa while he was in Connecticut to testify at a trial last fall.

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

“If anybody thinks they’re shutting me down, they’re mistaken,” Jones said on his new podcast last month.

The families now face a stark reality. It is not clear whether they will ever collect a significant portion of the assets Jones has transferred. So their ability to get anything remotely close to the jury awards is inextricably tied to Jones’ capacity to make a living as the purveyor of lies — including that the shooting was a hoax, the parents were actors and the children did not really die — that ignited years of torment and threats against them....
Click to expand...
 
Cypress said:
Looks like I sent you off to do a 20 minute internet research project. You don't have much of a life on weekends, eh?
Click to expand...

You are a dick.

You didn't say that chemistry used quantum concepts. Though I can understand why you would want to backtrack and modify your original assertion.
Click to expand...

No.

You said that quantum mechanics was the very heart of the science of chemistry.
Click to expand...

And I stand by it. Why do you think I taught you chemistry here.

Other than presenting students with the (technically incorrect) Bohr model of the atom, introductory college chemistry classes deal with quantum mechanics in a very superficial way, and they certainly don't do anymore than lip service at best to most basic quantum concepts, which are covered with much more rigour and depth in physics classes.

My challenge to you again is to contact ten universities, and tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and then observe if they refer you to the physics department or the biogeochem department
Click to expand...

All I need to know I now know. You never had a chemistry class. Or if you did it was so remedial as to be less than a high school class.

That means you didn't get a geology degree anytime in the last 50-70 years.

Ergo: you are lying about having a geology degree.

QED.
 
Cypress said:
Because you were caught red handed stealing syntax and language from internet sources and passing them off as your own. You do ten to 20 minutes of internet research to write a large fraction of your posts.

I don't do any Internet research on this thread and I write using my own words with the innate knowledge I have acquired. That's why I don't spend as much time here as you.


You didn't say chemistry used quantum concepts.

You said quantum mechanics was the very heart of the science of chemistry.

Nope. It is not the core and the heart of the science of chemistry.

I did just take a gander at the OpenStax introductory chemistry textbook used by the university of NorthGeorgia. About 30 pages out of more than 1,300 pages directly dealt with quantum mechanics; wave particle duality was mentioned only in passing and in the most cursory way; and many fundamental quantum concepts were completely absent
Click to expand...

It has now been shown that you didn't have any chemistry class or a very remedial one. That means you didn't get a geology degree (they require at least intro chemistry).

Ergo you are a liar.

Sorry.
 
Perry Phimosis said:
It has now been shown that you didn't have any chemistry class or a very remedial one. That means you didn't get a geology degree (they require at least intro chemistry).

Ergo you are a liar.

Sorry.
Click to expand...

All the bloviating, internet research, plagiarism, and paraphrasing you do doesn't distract from this simple experimental challenge:

Starting today, I challenge you to contact ten universities, tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and then observe how all ten schools will refer you to their physics departments.

If QM really were the heart and core of the science of chemistry, this experiment should show whether your claim was true or false.
 
Perry Phimosis said:
It has now been shown that you didn't have any chemistry class or a very remedial one. That means you didn't get a geology degree (they require at least intro chemistry).

Ergo you are a liar.

Sorry.
Click to expand...

No, it shows that you lied about having a glorious 'biogeochem' PhD, and you may not have even had introductory chemistry.

The introductory Chemistry textbook I looked at yesterday, and the one I had in college had maybe about 30 pages out of more than one thousand pages directly dealing with quantum mechanics (mainly just the Bohr model of the atom). Wave particle duality was mentioned only in passing and in the most cursory way. And many fundamental quantum concepts were completely absent.


You claimed that QM was the very heart and core of the science of chemistry.

You didn't say that chemistry merely used some QM concepts. Cell phones use QM concepts too.
 
Cypress said:
All the bloviating, internet research, plagiarism, and paraphrasing you do doesn't distract from this simple experimental challenge:

Starting today, I challenge you to contact ten universities, tell them you want a graduate degree in quantum mechanics, and then observe how all ten schools will refer you to their physics departments.

If QM really were the heart and core of the science of chemistry, this experiment should show whether your claim was true or false.
Click to expand...

You didn't have a chemistry class. Ergo you don't have a geology degree. Ergo you are a liar.

Sorry.
 
Cypress said:
No, it shows that you lied about having a glorious 'biogeochem' PhD, and you may not have even had introductory chemistry.

The introductory Chemistry textbook I looked at yesterday, and the one I had in college had maybe about 30 pages out of more than one thousand pages directly dealing with quantum mechanics (mainly just the Bohr model of the atom). Wave particle duality was mentioned only in passing and in the most cursory way. And many fundamental quantum concepts were completely absent.


You claimed that QM was the very heart and core of the science of chemistry.

You didn't say that chemistry merely used some QM concepts. Cell phones use QM concepts too.
Click to expand...

You have never had a chemistry class. Ergo you are not a geologist. Ergo you are a liar.

(If you had to go online to find a chem textbook it means you don't have one of your own which, again, means you ain't much of a scientist. The fact that you had to verify it for yourself NOW instead of knowing because you had a chem class is all I needed to know. You are a lying sack of shit).
 
Cypress said:
So you won't accept my challenge, and I understand why.
Click to expand...

Your challenge is stupid. It's because you don't know what you are talking about here. Yes QM has a significant part of physics but it is the core of chemistry. The fact that you don't know this is all I need to know how little chemistry you have had. And because I actually DO have a geology degree I know you have to have chemistry to get one. So I know you are a liar.

So far on this thread I've been the only one to post any science. All you ever do is whine.

All I need to know.

Poser.
 
Perry Phimosis said:
Your challenge is stupid. It's because you don't know what you are talking about here. Yes QM has a significant part of physics but it is the core of chemistry. The fact that you don't know this is all I need to know how little chemistry you have had. And because I actually DO have a geology degree I know you have to have chemistry to get one. So I know you are a liar.

So far on this thread I've been the only one to post any science. All you ever do is whine.

All I need to know.

Poser.
Click to expand...

You're the only one willing to do 20 minutes of internet research, frantic googling, plagiarize, and paraphrase to write a response on this thread.

The rest of us are writing our own words based on our own acquired innate knowledge.
 
Cypress said:
You're the only one willing to do 20 minutes of internet research, frantic googling, plagiarize, and paraphrase to write a response on this thread.
Click to expand...

Or actually know the stuff. But your ego is so fragile you cannot imagine someone would know this stuff.

The rest of us are writing our own words based on our own acquired innate knowledge.
Click to expand...

Is that why you never post anything of any scientific value?

I am onto your game now, fraud. I know you for what you are. You are a poser. Fake geophysicist. LOL. (Next time try choosing a degree you can actually fake your way through when online)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top