Judge declares PA voter ID law is invalid

Fact: In a 50-page determination (with another 50 pages of appendices) issued Friday morning, Judge McGinley found that a lack of compelling governmental interest in imposing the requirement -- the state acknowledged at the start that it knew of no cases of in-person voting fraud, the kind addressed by voter ID -- could not justify the law in the face of "overwhelming evidence" that hundreds of thousands of qualified voters lack acceptable documentation.

Information: Louis Daguerre and Joseph Nicéphore Niépce (who was Daguerre's partner, but died before their invention was completed) invented the first practical photographic method, which was named the daguerreotype, in 1839.

Questions: Why no photo ID required 150 years ago? Why no photo ID required 50 years ago? WHY NOW?


Even you must acknowledge that if you NEVER investigate the identity or citizenship of the voters, its obvious you will never find any evidence of illegal voting or voter fraud.....so the 'overwhelming evidence' of qualified voters is bogus on its face.....

Its pretty obvious that there is
"overwhelming evidence" that MILLIONS of tax payers do not cheat or even make mistakes on their taxes but that don't
stop the IRS from checking those millions of returns and auditing some taxpayers to guarentee as best they can that no one is committing tax fraud....and
the fact that they does find that there IS a small percentage of mistakes made and even some fraud....why do they find the mistakes and fruad..

Obviously because they check....we'll never find illegal voters and voter fraud if idiot liberals stick their collective heads up their ass and refuse
to admit that it exists....and we'll never know the extent of it.....

The integrety of elections doesn't interest liberals as long as they are winning....



Questions: Why no photo ID required 150 years ago? Why no photo ID required 50 years ago? WHY NOW?

A stupid question that doesn't deserve a serious answer.



 
Even you must acknowledge that if you NEVER investigate the identity or citizenship of the voters, its obvious you will never find any evidence of illegal voting or voter fraud.....so the 'overwhelming evidence' of qualified voters is bogus on its face.....

Its pretty obvious that there is
"overwhelming evidence" that MILLIONS of tax payers do not cheat or even make mistakes on their taxes but that don't
stop the IRS from checking those millions of returns and auditing some taxpayers to guarentee as best they can that no one is committing tax fraud....and
the fact that they does find that there IS a small percentage of mistakes made and even some fraud....why do they find the mistakes and fruad..

Obviously because they check....we'll never find illegal voters and voter fraud if idiot liberals stick their collective heads up their ass and refuse
to admit that it exists....and we'll never know the extent of it.....

The integrety of elections doesn't interest liberals as long as they are winning....



Questions: Why no photo ID required 150 years ago? Why no photo ID required 50 years ago? WHY NOW?

A stupid question that doesn't deserve a serious answer.




There has been plenty of checking into illegal voting, and no evidence was found and that was the basis of the judge's decision. Now which part of that decision don't you understand?

Second, explain to me why it's stupid to question why photo ID was never required before.
 
I already told you we don't have photo IDs for voting. And I also told you that forcing voters to have a photo ID to supposedly correct a non-existent problem is bogus.

Thats the logic that some people dying of cancer use when the doctor tells them if they had discovered the cancer 20 years ago they could of
saved the mans life.....
If you don't look for the problem, to you it doesn't exist .... until someday it hits you in the face...


As the evidence shows.... voter fraud don't exist, until you find it....

8 Democrats Arrested and/or Convicted of Voter Fraud

http://nationwidegazette.com/8-democ...r-voter-fraud/
---------------------------------
12 charged with voter fraud in Georgia election

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/24/12...rgia-election/
--------------------------------
Democratic officials arrested for voter fraud in Indiana
Names, signatures faked in Indiana to put Obama, Clinton on primary ballot
http://video.foxnews.com/v/249896156...ud-in-indiana/
-------------------------------
Fort Worth woman arrested in voter fraud case
By Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TX) August 22, 2013
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/08/2...er-fraud-case/
-------------------------------
7 Democrats Arrested in New York for actual Voter Fraud via Absentee Ballots
Democrats arrested, charged and 4 plead guilty to actual voter fraud in New York via absentee ballots!
------------------------------
NAACP Executive Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Voting for Obama 10 Times in 2008
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ng/B8Xe0hnJ-YI
 
You should know. Your repetition of Hillary being responsible for Benghazi is the biggest canard on the forum.


Isn't the state department responsible for the safety of our diplomats and embassy , etc...?

Didn't the latest investigative report place the blame on the state department ?

Wasn't Hillary the HEAD of the State Department at the time ?
 
There has been plenty of checking into illegal voting, and no evidence was found and that was the basis of the judge's decision. Now which part of that decision don't you understand?

Second, explain to me why it's stupid to question why photo ID was never required before.


How has there been checking if no one has to prove they are legal citizens.....except to say you are....

How is there checking when the RNC was prohibited to even verify the voters registration legal residence was factual....deshs pet strawmen.

Why to you lie to yourself ?
 
You should know. Your repetition of Hillary being responsible for Benghazi is the biggest canard on the forum.

Dear dunce; if you think Hillary wasn't responsible for Benghazi, you're dumber than a doorknob, or, a dishonest hyper partisan buffoon. I'm thinking you are both.
 
Thats the logic that some people dying of cancer use when the doctor tells them if they had discovered the cancer 20 years ago they could of
saved the mans life.....
If you don't look for the problem, to you it doesn't exist .... until someday it hits you in the face...


As the evidence shows.... voter fraud don't exist, until you find it....

8 Democrats Arrested and/or Convicted of Voter Fraud

http://nationwidegazette.com/8-democ...r-voter-fraud/
---------------------------------
12 charged with voter fraud in Georgia election

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/24/12...rgia-election/
--------------------------------
Democratic officials arrested for voter fraud in Indiana
Names, signatures faked in Indiana to put Obama, Clinton on primary ballot
http://video.foxnews.com/v/249896156...ud-in-indiana/
-------------------------------
Fort Worth woman arrested in voter fraud case
By Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TX) August 22, 2013
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/08/2...er-fraud-case/
-------------------------------
7 Democrats Arrested in New York for actual Voter Fraud via Absentee Ballots
Democrats arrested, charged and 4 plead guilty to actual voter fraud in New York via absentee ballots!
------------------------------
NAACP Executive Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Voting for Obama 10 Times in 2008
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ng/B8Xe0hnJ-YI

First of all, none of your links worked.

1. Apologies, but the page you requested could not be found. Perhaps searching will help.

2. The page you’re looking for can’t be found.

3. Page Not Found

4. The page you are looking for has either moved or is no longer available, but you may be interested in the content below.

5. http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/08/2...er-fraud-case/ Blank page.

6. Google groups. Article not found.

Now focus like a laser beam sunshine. The thread topic is about Pennsylvania, not Indiana, Georgia, Texas, etc. The judge wrote in his decision "the state acknowledged at the start that it knew of no cases of in-person voting fraud, the kind addressed by voter ID." Ergo, it's a non-existent problem.

 
You're the one who avoided the question 3x now by deflecting with your "I have no photo ID for voting". Which means you do have photo ID of course.

Posts 20,23 and 26. Your reading comprehension sucks. Try and focus. This is about VOTER ID, not driver ID, not work ID, not school ID.

Too bad the pea brains here can't actually address the judge's decision rather than throw out smoke screens.
 
Back
Top