Judge declares PA voter ID law is invalid

christiefan915 said:
Let's recap. The judge issued a 50-page decision and the main point is that there was no illicit voting that could have been prevented by photo ID, and you make an inane argument about violating the Constitution.

Where in the Constitution does it say a photo ID is required to vote?
Click to expand...

My argument about violating the Constitution had nothing to do with voter ID dunce; it was about radical jurists legislating from their bench. Read up on how our laws are made, separation of powers and the Constitution so that you can be informed rather than a brain dead hyper partisan parroting leftist canards.

Now, please tell me how showing an ID is violating anyone's rights or is considered racist dunce. Then when you are done with that, show us where voting is a "right" and not a "privilege. "

Don't worry, I'm not expecting anything honest or intelligent to erupt from your keyboard.
 
NOVA said:
Isn't the state department responsible for the safety of our diplomats and embassy , etc...?

Didn't the latest investigative report place the blame on the state department ?

Wasn't Hillary the HEAD of the State Department at the time ?
Click to expand...

The latest investigate report listed a number of reasons and circumstances that led up to the attack. But that's not what this thread's about.
 
christiefan915 said:
For the reasons outlined in the judge's decision. And as a taxpayer I resent the millions of dollars being spent on a spurious solution to a non-existent problem.
Click to expand...

But you have no problem when they are spent investigating a Republican Governor in New Jersey? Or on a Republican President for going to war in Iraq? Or for a Republican senator named Tom Delay?

Let's face it, you're a typical Liberal hypocrite engaging in dishonest hyperbole.
 
Truth Detector said:
Dear dunce; if you think Hillary wasn't responsible for Benghazi, you're dumber than a doorknob, or, a dishonest hyper partisan buffoon. I'm thinking you are both.
Click to expand...

Dear insufferable moron, if you don't think terrorists were responsible for Benghazi then you've just proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that you don't have two working brain cells to rub together.
 
NOVA said:
How has there been checking if no one has to prove they are legal citizens.....except to say you are....

How is there checking when the RNC was prohibited to even verify the voters registration legal residence was factual....deshs pet strawmen.

Why to you lie to yourself ?
Click to expand...

When you register to vote you are required to present proof of residency, citizenship.

In Alaska that can be in several forms, birth certificate being one form and some proof you live in the state.

You are then issued a voter ID card by the state. This is what I use to vote.
 
christiefan915 said:
Are you deliberately being obtuse? The state (read: the Corbett (R) administration) already looked and found nothing... zero, zilch, nada.
Click to expand...


Tell me....HOW is the gov. looking if no one is asked to prove citizenship to vote as the CONSTITUTION requires....? What methods are they using to examine voters at election time?

Registration ?.....proves nothing, except you registered...
Drivers ID ?........proves only that you passed a drivers test

Are you being obtuse ?
 
NOVA said:
How has there been checking if no one has to prove they are legal citizens.....except to say you are....

How is there checking when the RNC was prohibited to even verify the voters registration legal residence was factual....deshs pet strawmen.

Why to you lie to yourself ?
Click to expand...

Do you understand that we provide documentation of our citizenship when we register to vote?
 
In the very few cases of fraud they did find does not warrant taking the right away from others a d limiting their ability to vote.
 
Sardonic said:
When you register to vote you are required to present proof of residency, citizenship.

In Alaska that can be in several forms, birth certificate being one form and some proof you live in the state.

You are then issued a voter ID card by the state. This is what I use to vote.
Click to expand...

Prove you're a resident
Prove you're a citizen

Sounds reasonable to me.....
 
Sardonic said:
In the very few cases of fraud they did find does not warrant taking the right away from others a d limiting their ability to vote.
Click to expand...

The only people that are being affected are those that are not citizens or residents....and they should not be voting in the first place.
 
Truth Detector said:
But you have no problem when they are spent investigating a Republican Governor in New Jersey? Or on a Republican President for going to war in Iraq? Or for a Republican senator named Tom Delay?

Let's face it, you're a typical Liberal hypocrite engaging in dishonest hyperbole.
Click to expand...

I don't give a shit what they do in NJ because I don't live there and it's not my problem, numbskull.

Using your (lack of) logic, why do you care what happens in PA re: photo ID for voters?
 
The Dude said:
You wide stance ears wouldn't say dick if a republican were in charge.
Continue it's hacktastic
Click to expand...

Dear dunce; please show me where I defended ANY politician for purely political purposes?

But again, you're an uneducated fool who can't follow a thread topic and engages in moronic crapflooding; yay you.
 
christiefan915 said:
Do you understand that we provide documentation of our citizenship when we register to vote?
Click to expand...

NO, you do not.....all you have to do is say you are citizen...you don't have to prove it with documentation.....
If that were true there would be purpose behind a voter ID card.
 
No, others are legal citizens, residents and they are impeded from voting and that is why the judge ruled against the law. It created a hardship for some voters, the poor and the elderly.

A large segment of the Alaska population doesn't have birth certificates, it would affect them, they don't have photo IDs, they live in remote villages in Alaska, but they are citizens and they have a legal right to vote. Our Constitution states everyone is equal under the law.

It easier for someone like me to drive to the DMV and obtain a photo ID, but it puts a hardship on others and that is not allowed under our laws.
 
Sardonic said:
In the very few cases of fraud they did find does not warrant taking the right away from others a d limiting their ability to vote.
Click to expand...

I think fraud is widespread. I think the dem politicians fear losing a lot of seats if people have to prove they're really the correct person.

Rana,,,, Why did you change your name to Sardonic?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top