Has it ever been used to decrease a budget on a Tuesday night when it's raining and those sponsoring the legislation are left handed?
Hows about you find a few more ways to split that hair, eh QueerBoy?
LOVE IT, ROTFLMAO!
Has it ever been used to decrease a budget on a Tuesday night when it's raining and those sponsoring the legislation are left handed?
Hows about you find a few more ways to split that hair, eh QueerBoy?
Just answer the question.
Wrong question. Has the reconciliation process ever been used except to decrease a budget on a bill? A simple yes or no would suffice.Yes, the self-executing rule has been used other than to decrease the budget on a bill.
Wrong question. Has the reconciliation process ever been used except to decrease a budget on a bill? A simple yes or no would suffice.
But has the procedure been used to pass a bill prohibiting green men from reciting the alphabet while standing on there heads in a rainstorm?
The Slaughter Rule has never been used for anything, because it was just created out of thin air by Democrats because they lack the votes to pass this monstrosity! The procedure being used to formulate the Slaughter Rule, has been used numerous times, on much less significant legislation, and in a way respecting the integrity of Congress. This is an outrage! Every American should be DEMANDING they vote on this bill! Up or Down, let's GO! The time for debate is over, the time for amendments is over! Send the bill to the floor for a vote, and let our representatives go on record... NOW! Or, pull the bill and let's start over from square one! Because I promise you pinhead, this will NOT stand! The American people will not allow this, and if it means rounding up pitchforks and firing up the torches and heading to Washington, that's what is about to fucking happen, if this proceeds! There is going to be an outrage like you've not witnessed in your lifetime, and it's going to make Tea Party Rallies look like a bake sale!
Ohhh, I am frightened....
Listen Dixie, America, love it or leave it!
..............So when ya leavin?![]()
Yes.
And I note that the chart that you were responding to demonstrates the use of the self-executing rule, not reconciliation.
http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/what-is-reconciliation/Reconciliation is a legislative process in the United States Senate intended to allow consideration of a contentious budget bill without the threat of filibuster. Introduced in 1974, reconciliation limits debate and amendment, and therefore favors the majority party.
…The Byrd Rule (described below) was adopted in 1985 and amended in 1990. Its main effect is that reconciliation cannot be used for provisions that would increase the deficit beyond 10 years after the reconciliation measure.
Congress used reconciliation to enact President Bill Clinton’s 1993 (fiscal year 1994) budget. (See Pub.L. 103-66, 107 Stat. 312.) Clinton wanted to use reconciliation to pass his 1993 health care plan, but Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) insisted that the health care plan was out of bounds for a process that is theoretically about budgets.
The Slaughter Rule has never been used for anything, because it was just created out of thin air by Democrats because they lack the votes to pass this monstrosity! The procedure being used to formulate the Slaughter Rule, has been used numerous times, on much less significant legislation, and in a way respecting the integrity of Congress. This is an outrage! Every American should be DEMANDING they vote on this bill! Up or Down, let's GO! The time for debate is over, the time for amendments is over! Send the bill to the floor for a vote, and let our representatives go on record... NOW! Or, pull the bill and let's start over from square one! Because I promise you pinhead, this will NOT stand! The American people will not allow this, and if it means rounding up pitchforks and firing up the torches and heading to Washington, that's what is about to fucking happen, if this proceeds! There is going to be an outrage like you've not witnessed in your lifetime, and it's going to make Tea Party Rallies look like a bake sale!
Thats the point, I LOVE It, I am not talking about taking up arms against it, like you seem to be doing.
I am obligated and dedicated to uphold the Constitution when it says "against all enemies foreign and domestic" and that is what I view you at this point. A domestic enemy who has invaded our representative republic and installed a democratic dictatorship. I regret that it's coming down to this, and we are seeing that you are all a bunch of liars when you spoke of bipartisanship and changing the tone in Washington... but the time for peaceful solutions is running out.
I don't want you to take that as a threat, I want you to understand, we are reaching a tipping point in this country, and the people will not stand for this. We're not Europeans, we mostly have a heritage of defying constraints of political power, that's why we came here to America! You may think you can shoehorn us into some Liberal Wet Dream, but I think you are about to be in for a rude awakening to reality.
Landmark Legal Foundation to File Suit to Stop President’s Health Plan if ‘Slaughter Rule’ is Used
(LEESBURG, VA, MARCH 17, 2010)…Mark R. Levin, president of Landmark Legal Foundation, today issued a warning to the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives about the possible use of the so-called “deem and pass,” “self-executing,” or “Slaughter Rule” to enact H.R. 3590, the legislative version of President Obama’s healthcare proposal that has been previously approved by the Senate. If this tactic is employed, Landmark will immediately sue the President, Attorney General Eric Holder and other relevant cabinet members to prevent them from instituting this unconstitutional contrivance.
“Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed in federal court the moment the House acts. Such a brazen violation of the core functions of Congress simply cannot be ignored. Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution is clear respecting the manner in which a bill becomes law. Members are required to vote on this bill, not claim they did when they didn’t. The Speaker of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution.
WTG GREAT ONE!