Lefties attack Trump's scotus pick

Evmetro said:
That's why I want mitch to ram this through. Lefties have no regard for civics, and they wouldn't hesitate to ram a pick through if the shoe was on the other foot.
Click to expand...
Ram it through because if you don't, you don't get it, and either way the lefties are going to expand the size of the court when they take over and pack it with libs anyway...
 
Nordberg said:
According to Trump and right wing logic, Trump has no right to make the pick, They made it all very clear during Garland. We should respect the Republican's well thought out positions. No Supreme seat should be considered during a the last year of an administration. You rights all brayed that for all to hear. They said it, so we assume they meant it. Otherwise we have to believe the arguments during Garland were all lies. But no matter how you slice it, the Repubs are being liars and hypocrites.
Click to expand...

Do you have proof this is the last year of trump's presidency?
 
Yakuda said:
Do you have proof this is the last year of trump's presidency?
Click to expand...

Unless Trump dies of Trump disease, his last year of presidency will be 2021.....although there is a slim chance Trump will bail sometime after November 4th if he loses.
 
Crocodile said:
Who cares who he picked. The standard that was given last time was not in an election year. Is it time to admit your side is just phony, contemptuous, and full of shit?
Click to expand...

There is only ONE standard you whiny, uneducated, lying leftist loon; it's called the CONSTITUTION. Read it some time simpleton. Assuming of course you have ANY reading comprehension skills.

th
 
Crocodile said:
Who cares who he picked. The standard that was given last time was not in an election year.
Click to expand...
... and that "standard" was based on the Biden Rule of 1992... This is all irrelevant anyway, as a President has the constitutional power to nominate and appoint SC justices during the FULL LENGTH of his term... It is still Trump's term, dummy...

Crocodile said:
Is it time to admit your side is just phony, contemptuous, and full of shit?
Click to expand...
What is the difference between Mitch and the Senate giving Garland a hearing (and rejecting him) or just saving the time/hassle and denying the hearing at the outset, as he did? The Senate is not required to consent to any particular justice...

All of this comparison between 2016 and 2020 and 1992 is just irrelevant whiny bullshit anyway... In 2016, Obama had the power to nominate and appoint Garland, and the Senate had advisory and consent powers regarding the confirmation of Garland. Obama nominated, and the Senate did not consent... it is as simple as that. In 2020, Trump likewise has the power to nominate and appoint [insert SC justice here], and the Senate has advisory and consent powers regarding his choice. NOTHING is different between 2016, 2020, and 1992 besides which party had control over the Presidency/Senate at the time...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Unless Trump dies of Trump disease, his last year of presidency will be 2021.....although there is a slim chance Trump will bail sometime after November 4th if he loses.
Click to expand...

I asked for proof not your opinion but thank you for sharing. You sound ignorant when you use the term trump disese. I have heard leftists say trump has killed people but just like your response here, when asked to provide proof you guys never do. So you say ignorant things and then wonder why people treat you like you're ignorant.
 
DEMOCRATS Post Job Listing For Supreme Court Nominee Accusers

article-7049-2.jpg


In anticipation of Trump's upcoming announcement of who he will nominate to the Supreme Court, the Democrats have posted a nationwide job listing for believable accusers to tarnish the reputation of whoever Trump nominates.

The best candidates from all applicants will be invited to a casting call in D.C. to show off their "believable accusation" ability.

"We know that whoever Trump nominates will be an evil, mean, bad person," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. "That's just the kind of man Trump is. He hangs around evil, mean, bad people and he nominates them too. To prove this and save our democracy, we are hiring several believable witnesses to accuse Trump's nominee of whatever they probably did."

Listings have been purchased on ZipRecruiter, Monster, LinkedIn, and Craigslist.

Interested candidates will have just a few days to submit their applications before the Senate hearing.

At the casting call, they will be judged on their ability to cry on command while telling a horrific story of abuse on camera.

"We need brave patriots to step up and save our country by destroying the life of this nominee," said Nancy Pelosi before pausing awkwardly to add "um... Good morning! Sunday morning!"



https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-post-job-listing-for-supreme-court-nominee-accusers/?utm_content=buffer97a7c&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
 
archives said:
Depends upon who he nominates, but they will be challenged, I'd wage on abortion, defending Trump, and civil rights

And the attack will start when Mitch attempts to ram in thru, actually, they already have given Mitch didn't wait till the lady was in the grave before declaring his intentions
Click to expand...

Correction to the bolded; the whining, lying and bitching will start the minute Mitch CONSTITUTIONALLY begins the confirmation process.

FACT: Democrats have ZERO power to stop the CONSTITUTIONAL process from going through.

FACT: Democrats will act like angry, hate filled triggered loons trying to burn down their own house.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
Is there any righty here who will say he agrees that it is wrong for Trump to make a choice because of the arguments against Garland?. Any of you at all?
Click to expand...

it would be wrong for us to make stupid statements like the lib'ruls have done.......
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Is it really a surprise to you that the Left attacks Trump and the Republicans supporting a pick just before an election?
Click to expand...

of course not......what is surprising is that any of you think your objections should be taken seriously.......there is no one in the world who believes you wouldn't do the same thing........
 
Yakuda said:
I asked for proof not your opinion but thank you for sharing. You sound ignorant when you use the term trump disese. I have heard leftists say trump has killed people but just like your response here, when asked to provide proof you guys never do. So you say ignorant things and then wonder why people treat you like you're ignorant.
Click to expand...

There is no proof. You can't prove Biden won't win the election or that the Republicans won't lose the Senate.

Trump failed to properly lead the nation through this crisis which is why our infection and fatality rate is higher than other modern nations. Sure, Congress deserves a good portion of the blame too since they spent more time playing politics than doing their job, but Trump is the President. He should have led by example. A point anyone who spent time in the military should realize.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...f750ac-f6c2-11ea-85f7-5941188a98cd_story.html
Israel, Spain and France all fought the novel coronavirus into abatement in the first months of the pandemic with tough measures that won international praise. But the three countries now share a painful distinction: Their infection rates have shot past that of the United States, even though Americans never got the virus under control.

The experience of these three nations demonstrates the difficulty of keeping the virus at bay, experts and officials say, and how reopening too quickly and other missteps can undermine successful national policies. For countries with more chaotic approaches, such as the United States, the challenge may be even greater.
 
archives said:
.......and I think Mitch will attempt to ram it thru,
Click to expand...

It isn't getting "rammed" through. It is following CONSTITUTIONAL requirements. Dumbass. :palm:

archives said:
.....which will work out for the Democrats,
Click to expand...

No it won't. This is boorish wishful thinking. It will make the Democrats look like triggered hate filled loons AGAIN. Must like looking like a boorish dumbass all the time.

archives said:
...if you recall, the right said what they saw as the picking on Brett would hurt the Democrats in the upcoming election but in fact insured the House for the Democrats in 2018
Click to expand...

What we saw was Obama picking a SJ in an election without control of the Senate. Democrat's lied and cried. Democrats then acted like hateful wackos during the Kavanaugh hearings. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top