IBDaMann
Well-known member
One more time, nobody is disputing droplets. I think viruses themselves are still the issue, if I'm not mistaken.One more time.... nobody is disputing the size.
One more time, nobody is disputing droplets. I think viruses themselves are still the issue, if I'm not mistaken.One more time.... nobody is disputing the size.
One more time, nobody is disputing droplets. I think viruses themselves are still the issue, if I'm not mistaken.
The issue is can coronaviruses survive without droplets? That is if they even manage to separate themselves from the droplets.
In order for me to fuck off, don't I have to fill out some forms or something?Yes it will. BTW, the guy I was talking to already admitted masks are total bullshit so you can go fuck off now.
In order for me to fuck off, don't I have to fill out some forms or something?
Oh, and no, distancing doesn't really help any, but morons think it does. If it help you feel better by staying far away, please do everyone a favor and do what you need to do.
Wrong. The issue in this thread is masks. make your case.
The issue is can coronaviruses survive without droplets? That is if they even manage to separate themselves from the droplets.
The premise is that covid viruses are smaller than the "pores" in the masks and they can survive unassisted while airborne. Is there any evidence of the claim? We are aware of the sizes. No disputing that.
You say there is no disputing that...yet you still do.
What point exactly are you trying to make?
Coronavirus floats in the air on average ~3 hours (each individual virus' mileage may vary) before working its way to a surface where it will survive for ~3 days.
The point is that there is no evidence that naked coronaviruses can survive on their own without droplets from lungs.
Incorrect.Correct. They float while riding on droplets, touching the surfaces.
You are in a thread about masks.
Incorrect.
1. Viruses are not required to be in a droplet. Billions upon billions are floating freely.
2. Those that happen to be in droplets are only so for a very brief period as droplets quickly evaporate, leaving whatever viruses were contained therein floating freely.
Yes I know.
For those Trump supporters, perhaps if I use Trumpese language, they might understand.
If there is no border wall. What would happen?
If the border wall is built, would it mean 100% foolproof?
See here you go again. Make your point. You've already admitted masks don't work yet you keep arguing.
Make whatever point you're trying to make.
The masks don't work if coronaviruses can survive on their own without droplets. That's the premise.
My Fuckin Lord. It's not new, it's a coronavirus, we're acting like it's the Black Plague. Masks don't work, we both know that. What fucking point are you trying to make? Droplets? No shit Sherlock, really?
It is nothing new.
Here's something to ponder. Know what's strange? If you read a newspaper from 1919, you'd think you're reading a newspaper from 2019 - 2020. 100 years. My mind says it's a coincidence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/03/us/mask-protests-1918.html#:~:text=the%20main%20story-,The%20Mask%20Slackers%20of%201918,in%20political%20and%20cultural%20wars.&text=The%20masks%20were%20called%20muzzles,their%20masks%20to%20smoke%20cigars.
Here's one I like and it's better: https://www.history.com/news/1918-pandemic-public-health-campaigns
This is a very good example of history repeating itself.
Maskers vs Non-Maskers.Nothing new like you said.
Spit it out or fuck off.