Lefty mask scam

CFM said:
1918, 2009, and 2020 are examples of people being duped.

As I've said, according to the so called "experts", I'm a prime candidate to catch it since I don't do the things they say will prevent or significantly decrease the likelihood of me getting Covid. There are people that have social distanced and worn a mask regularly that caught it. Why haven't I caught it?
Click to expand...

Maybe, just maybe, mask wearing and social distancing is stupid??

Maybe, just maybe, you happen to have a functioning immune system?? ;)

People seem to have completely forgotten about their immune systems...
 
Evmetro said:
I've noticed that in all threads about masks where mask function is function is discussed, lefties use the n95 as the benchmark when they want to show benefits of wearing masks. The problem though, is that the n95 is not what people are wearing. Forget for a moment that the exhalation valve let's 100% of droplets out unfiltered, just look at the availability of the n95. Why would lefties use the n95 as a reference if it is not being used? Why not look at the simple surgeon masks or cloth masks that people are actually using? Using n95 specs to justify wearing simple cloth masks or surgical masks is a scam. Using n95 filtration specs to do this while also claiming that masks protect others is a scam as well, since the exhalation valve allows unfiltered exhaust. Lefties can't help scamming.
Click to expand...

Most testing has been done with the N95 masks. When idiots like you make comments about how viruses can get through the pores, it is the N95 testing that proves you are a know nothing idiot.

Let's examine your mistakes in this post alone.
N95 masks don't all come with an exhalation valve. Those that still reduce and redirect the air flow of any droplets.
Tests have been done on the cloth masks and surgical masks. They have tested to stop 80% compared to the 95 that N95 masks stop.

The only scam here is you arguing that masks do nothing to stop viruses. Please present one single scientific article where the author performed actual tests to support your claim.
 
Steven VanderMolen said:
And I MOSTLY wear my masks to please my sister. She's a goodhearted person, always willing to help out others. She's in constant pain every day from severe migraine headaches. She's been going to the world known Diamond Headache Clinic in Chicago for over 12 years now, unfortunately they still haven't found the root cause of her headaches. They don't prescribe narcotic or opioid medications anymore because there was too much addiction and abuse from the patients. My sister was addicted to opioids so bad they almost killed her. I had to take early retirement about 5 and a half years ago to take care of her, and help get her off the opioids. It took nearly a year, but she kicked her habit. She's been clean for over 4 years now. I've stayed retired so I can live with her and watch over her. She watches over ME, as well.
Click to expand...
Yeah, severe migraines are no joke. I have a cousin who suffers with them and has tried everything and likewise can't figure out the cause of them.
 
zymurgy said:
TDS is the reason. Trump touted it, and we will throw out science if it means getting rid of the bad man
Click to expand...
And with the vaccine that the liberals are soooooo anxious to get made and receive, they now distrust and hate it since it might come out while Trump is still in office. Crazed lunatics.

Personally, I'm not gonna take it anyway, but the liberal thought process is well beyond any sort of reason.
 
gfm7175 said:
One can't spread a disease that they DON'T HAVE, moron...


Seat belts do not prevent accidents, moron... They help to reduce the risk/severity of personal injury/death that can result from being in an accident.
Click to expand...

Masks may help reduce the risk/severity of Covid.

If the amount of virus one is exposed to is reduced it may prevent infection or reduce the severity of the disease caused by a virus
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342672/
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Most testing has been done with the N95 masks. When idiots like you make comments about how viruses can get through the pores, it is the N95 testing that proves you are a know nothing idiot.

Let's examine your mistakes in this post alone.
N95 masks don't all come with an exhalation valve. Those that still reduce and redirect the air flow of any droplets.
Tests have been done on the cloth masks and surgical masks. They have tested to stop 80% compared to the 95 that N95 masks stop.

The only scam here is you arguing that masks do nothing to stop viruses. Please present one single scientific article where the author performed actual tests to support your claim.
Click to expand...

You forgot to explain why lefties reference n95specs to justify wearing a cheap cloth or surgical masks. You are still perpetuating the scam.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Masks may help reduce the risk/severity of Covid.
Click to expand...
Nope, mask wearing has absolutely zero effect on a COVID infection (severity).

Mask wearing does not prevent one from contracting COVID either (risk)...

Poor Richard Saunders said:
If the amount of virus one is exposed to is reduced it may prevent infection or reduce the severity of the disease caused by a virus
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342672/
Click to expand...
All it takes is the presence of a single virus to potentially infect someone and for the infection to potentially lead to death...
 
I already explained it. Are you incapable of reading? Do you need a coloring book and crayons?

When you claim masks don't stop viruses then any research that proves that wrong is valid and since most of the research has been done with N95 masks that is the majority of the science.
Your desire to be willfully ignorant and now moving the goal posts doesn't change the facts. Masks clearly stop viruses and other particles smaller than the "pores" in the mask.

Recent research has shown that cloth masks and surgical masks stop 80% of aerosols so they also work to stop viruses. You have been shown that research. Your willful ignorance is not science.

The one "study" you presented is one where the author misrepresents what the research shows. The author also fails to look at 19 other science articles that clearly refute his conclusions. Go ahead and be stupid. It fits you well. I am sure you think repeating your stupidity will drag others down to your level. From this point, I will simply post links to the research in response to your claims. Anyone with half a brain can follow the links. Those with less than half a brain can follow you.

Let me ask you again. Do you have any valid study where someone conducted actual research to discover that masks don't stop viruses?
 
gfm7175 said:
Nope, mask wearing has absolutely zero effect on a COVID infection (severity).

Mask wearing does not prevent one from contracting COVID either (risk)...


All it takes is the presence of a single virus to potentially infect someone and for the infection to potentially lead to death...
Click to expand...

Let's all blissfully ignore science. It makes for a much better world. You forgot to say that computers use magic and the world is flat.

Science article that shows through research that reducing the amount of virus someone contacts reduces severity of illness.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342672/
 
gfm7175 said:
Nah, I'd rather adhere to it. Same goes for logic and mathematics.


No valid argumentation presented.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you can explain how the science of brownian movement doesn't work on masks in your world.
https://www.sphosp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Letter-in-response-to-N-95-use-RA-Final.pdf

particles that are smaller or larger than the MPPS are captured with higher filtration efficiency. Filtration via diffusion (most noticeable for particles smaller than 0.1 μm) actually increases as particle size decreases. Other research has confirmed that filter efficiency increases with decreasing particle size, even for particles as small as 0.003 μm (much smaller than that of virus).”
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Perhaps you can explain how the science of brownian movement doesn't work on masks in your world.
https://www.sphosp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Letter-in-response-to-N-95-use-RA-Final.pdf

particles that are smaller or larger than the MPPS are captured with higher filtration efficiency. Filtration via diffusion (most noticeable for particles smaller than 0.1 μm) actually increases as particle size decreases. Other research has confirmed that filter efficiency increases with decreasing particle size, even for particles as small as 0.003 μm (much smaller than that of virus).”
Click to expand...

Which masks feature brownian movement filtration? The n95, the cheap cloth ones, or the surgical ones? Do you know what conditions are required in order for brownian motion to occur? What underlying physical mechanisms are required for the pressure dependent retention of particles? Flow-dependent entrapment of bioparticles requires certain convective and diffusive forces, right? Please explain the nature of these forces in masks.
 
gfm7175 said:
What mask wearers?
Click to expand...

00xp-1918masks-03-superJumbo.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
No one is saying that masks stop viral transmissions 100%.
Click to expand...

Why is no one....including the CDC and the WHO presenting the model study that demonstrates that masks stop the C19 virus? Because no such scientific study exists. They should have launched a study before mandating the people to wear these useless costumes.

Apparently they do not stop the virus AT ALL.......according to the number of cases that exist. No mask can stop a viral pathogen....or there would be no need for viral vaccines. Look at the facts. The Swiss did not mandate masks, they did not stop children from going to school they did not shut down their free market economy via laying off the least at risk from any virus.....the young and healthy. How many people died? 2K.......just like the seasonal flu kills those at high risk....the infirmed or elderly.

Why sequester the young and healthy that have over a 99.5% of recovery? Why not take care of the infirmed elderly instead of sentencing them to an early death by mandating all Homes for the Elderly to take in known infected patients instead of using the Hospital ships and the emergency hospitals erected by the Federal Government which went UNUSED (waste of tax money)? The left needed a HIGH DEATH COUNT to induce fear. Its not rocket science......there is a DOJ investigation into the action of the NY politicians....who are attempting to stone wall the investigation by not handing over the requested documents (until after the election).....again they are depending upon a corrupt left wing victory. It will not work. Trump is so far ahead of the Potato Head and Heels Up Harris that its getting funnier every day as the FAKE NEWS tells us Hiden Biden is up by 10 points........when the Trump supporters outnumber his people at his own Rallies.
 
Last edited:
Ralph said:
Why is no one....including the CDC and the WHO presenting the model study that demonstrates that masks stop the C19 virus? Because no such scientific study exists.

Apparently they do not stop the virus AT ALL.......according the number of cases that exist. No mask can stop a viral pathogen....or there would be no need for viral vaccines. Look at the facts. Switerland did not mandate masks, they did not stop children from going to school they did not shut down their free market economy via laying off the least at risk from any virus.....the young and healthy. How many people died? 2K.......just like the seasonal flu kills those at high risk....the infirmed or elderly.
Click to expand...

Switzerland is not America.

Do you have evidence that masks do not stop the virus AT ALL?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top