I'm not here to impress you!
What "illegal" scheme? The president has the right to scrutinize where taxpayer money goes, or don't you think he does (or should)?
The scheme to extort the Ukrainian Leader into announcing an investigation into Joe Biden ... in return for 400 million in previously approved Military Aid.
The Ukrainian Leader says it never happened. You say different?
Well...there is that.Joe Biden didn't have any dealings in Ukraine.
You should think about buying John Bolton's book.
Actually, that's an excellent question. Let's discussHow do Jarod and Ivanka manage to get a pass from Republicans and their boot licking media propaganda machine for being investigated for corruption?
The Ukrainian Leader says it never happened. You say different?
Do you understand the pressure he was under? they were in a shooting conflict with Russia and needed the equipment. If he told the truth do you think Trump would have sat on the aid longer? He could not afford to piss off Trump. He was going to say whatever trump wanted to hear. But time ran out and Trump had to let it go. If you read Ukraine papers, you would see them laughing at Trump. They do not know why they are becoming the point of Trump and of American news.
The difference between 'then' and 'now', is that the Obama Administration went after 'corruption in Ukraine',
Trump went after a 'Political Rival' for the benefit of Trump and his re-election, and had nothing to do with safeguarding Taxpayer Money.
Trump used Taxpayer Money as an extortion tool.
As Ukraine is being occupied by Russian Federation Forces, Trump deftly withholds vital Military Aid until Zelensky 'does him a Favor', namely, publicly state Ukraine is investigating the Bidens.
First, lets easily, for the umpteenth time, clarify the facts in the Biden accusations:
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/trump-twists-facts-on-biden-and-ukraine/
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-joe-biden-hunter-biden-and-ukraine/
factcheck.org/2019/09/trump-twists-facts-on-biden-and-ukraine/
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...ent-donald-trump-ukraine-biden-whistleblower/
news.yahoo.com/bolton-claims-trump-tied-ukraine-131544840.html
The witnesses were requested, most which followed orders from the White House to refuse, which they did, given that the McGhan subpoena has already been delayed in the Courts for over nine months now, waiting for the Courts to decide on subpoenas would have taken the hearings past the election if not longer.
Have you ever seen or even heard of a real trial where all witnesses were denied from testifying?
There was no quid pro quo anywhere relevant to Biden
The question isn't what Trump gave the Ukraine after he was caught, irrelevant, rather if he leveraged this aid passed by Congress earlier for "favors" to advance his own personal political interests
Nothing personal, but you are just echoing the talk radio, Humanity innuendos which have been debunked many times over
FACT! Hunter Biden was EMPLOYED by a corrupt Ukraine energy company as a board member. Hunter Biden knows ZERO about oil, gas or anything “ENERGY.” Hunter Biden doesn’t even speak Ukraine. Hunter Biden’s father STOPPED an investigation into the CORRUPTION OF the energy company Hunter Biden, (HIS SON), was employed by at a rate of $80,000 a month. Quid-Pro-Quo Joe Biden bribed the Ukraine government by threatening them that he would stop a billion dollar U.S. taxpayer’s aid package to Ukraine if they did not fire/remove the investigating Ukraine Prosecutor. Ukraine fired/removed the Ukraine investigating Prosecutor! Hunter Biden made millions of dollars from the corrupt Ukraine energy company that was involved in money laundering among other crimes. Hunter Biden was selling “INFLUENCE” to his father to the Corrupt Ukraine energy company and collecting the millions of dollars by being a member of the board of directors of the corrupt Ukraine energy company.
Debunk those FACTS! Tell the class why that’s “DOING NOTHING WRONG!
Justice often takes time! Fact! The House had and still has the opportunity and authority to subpoena any and every witness and document they wish to TESTIFY IN THE HOUSE, THEY FAILED TO DO SO! If Nancy was SOOOOOO concerned about justice taking too much time, why did she sit on the articles of impeachment for a month before delivering them to the Senate? Was she waiting for her batch of ceremonial pens to be delivered so she and her henchmen could put on their joyful and prayerful ceremony as they smiled, laughed, giggled and prayed for Trump’s crucifixion?
Impeachments aren’t “real trials” in the same normal format as other every day operations of jurist prudence. Impeachments are a special “CONSTITUTIONAL” mandated “POLITICAL” operations. They’re governed by the Constitution and the rules of the People’s House and the rules of the U.S. Senate!
Fact. Hunter was hired as a lobbyist, a profession he had experience in. He graduated from Georgetown and Yale law. Pretty impressive, don't you think? He founded an international consulting firm. He was not going to dig wells for Burisma. You are going down the wrong road again.
Joe was dealing with real corruption. Shokin was corrupt and all the countries that dealt with him were pleased that Joe forced him out. They were providing a billion dollar loan guarantee that they knew Shokin would grab as much as he could. Shokin investigated Burisma for environmental violations from 2010 to 2012. You should feel like a sucker again Robo.
I was sure you knew that Trump prohibited everyone in his admin and those outside of it to refuse subpoenas and providing documentation. The House would have loved to talk to those people but Trump stopped it. The witnesses they had told plenty about Trump corruption.
You swallow all the right-wing crap. She held the impeachment and it worked to the Dems advantage. It kepy Moscow from shutting it down before the American people could digest it.
So you think impeachment should not seek the facts and truth. They are not regular trials, so the Repubs can do whatever they want. They are hiding the facts and preventing witnesses from revealing what happened. And you are good with that. You should be ashamed.
Let's see how many leftist will rationally answer this post
the correct move for the house would have been to kick the subpoena issue up the legal ladder for resolutio . instead they kicked fhe whole mess to the senate. now it's all over. sorry. dems fucked up.
It doesn’t matter how much time they would have taken, they would not convict Trump. Let’s not kid ourselves.the correct move for the house would have been to kick the subpoena issue up the legal ladder for resolutio . instead they kicked fhe whole mess to the senate. now it's all over. sorry. dems fucked up.
It doesn’t matter how much time they would have taken, they would not convict Trump. Let’s not kid ourselves.