Let's see how many leftist will rationally answer this post

[Gonzomin]

Apparently you failed to watch Quid-Pro-Quo Joe's video, huh?

Apparently you cannot understand it. You have that video as wrong as everything else you are typing. You swallow everything the right says and think you are being intelligent and discerning. You are trapped in a Trump bubble somehow managing to believe everything they feed you and think you have analyzed fairly.

 

[Scut Farkus]

No shit. that is why the debate. However, the Dems are open to witnesses and testimony. I bet even rightys understand that would solidify whatever decisions the trial makes. It would provide facts and justifications. The Repubs have to justify to all voters why they stopped us from having a full and fair trial. I think meet and greets with the voters are going to be uncomfortable. The fact that you can do something wrong and get away with it , does not mean you should. I think everyone with firing neurons knows the decision should be made by gathering all the evidence possible. The Repubs are blocking evidence.

so stfu.

 

[Truth Detector]

It doesn’t matter how much time they would have taken, they would not convict Trump. Let’s not kid ourselves.

Did Democrats convict Clinton when he had committed actual crimes? You whiny, hypocritical, lie filled Fascists really need to STFU.

 

[Truth Detector]

Oh, I'd still like to hear the witnesses. I want them on record for prosperity.

This is another PHONY narrative; there were no witnesses because nothing untoward or illegal occurred.

 

[Truth Detector]

The only interaction Joe had with Ukraine was in an official capacity representing the US and allies.

 

[Truth Detector]

Nope, he sure didn’t lie about getting the feckless prosecutor fired.
The lie about the bribe is yours.

Dumb
Obsessed
Mendacious
Egotistical
Rude
76 IQ

 

[Truth Detector]

Bolton's book scrambled up everything the Repubs had planned.

Flashback: John Bolton Described the President’s conversations with Zelensky as 'warm and cordial'

 

[Truth Detector]

Can you go a post without calling people names and insulting. The fact is Trump actively prevented his people and many others from testifying or providing documents. What kind of legal maneuvers do you suggest that work on stonewalling? They issued 3 subpoenas and they were rejected. The only one that was not was McGahans and it is still tied up in court. Justice delayed is justice not served.

FLASHBACK: Adam Schiff In 2005 Said John Bolton Has A “Lack Of Credibility”

 

[Truth Detector]

There have been 3 impeachments in history and the House and senate make their own rules. Where do you derive any precedent? The ill-informed one is you. They are debating that today, like whether they should have witnesses. that is fundamental to a trial. They all have that. But this time, we should not have witnesses?

The process, each side presents their witnesses to submit to questioning in the interests of having a fair trial that all can accept. Can you point out where that is acceptable? what court? Yet they are debating it and all that matters is if Moscow can get 51 votes.

Democratic Hypocrites over impeachment on display:

 

[Truth Detector]

You are. thanks for playing. The Senate has been debating witnesses for a week. They are doing it again today. They are not discussing it on legal or moral grounds, but political. We all know it would be a more respected trial and conclusion if it had witnesses. There is no argument about that. The repubs want a worse trial for political reasons. They also want to protect Trump from paying for the things he does.
The reason they are debating it is because they have the power to make that decision. There is no binding precedent. There is no established law.

Jerry Nadler | We're Lowering the Standard of Impeachment

 

[Truth Detector]

Apparently you cannot understand it. You have that video as wrong as everything else you are typing. You swallow everything the right says and think you are being intelligent and discerning. You are trapped in a Trump bubble somehow managing to believe everything they feed you and think you have analyzed fairly.

^Says the willful idiot who gets everything wrong all the time.

Democratic Hypocrites over impeachment on display:

 

[Nordberg]

Actually, the thing they had in common was the fact that every witness that was called in every Presidential impeachment, by the Senate were the very same witnesses that had been called in the House before the articles ever went to the Senate, ZERO NEW witnesses were ever called in the Senate including the Clinton impeachment.

Why do you do this? you are embarrassing yourself. Trump prohibited anyone on his staff, administration or anyone else from testifying or providing documentation. We were lucky that a few people respected the truth enough to tell it in the House. You are content with hiding it and lying about it.
There have been 26 impeachments in history. Judges get impeached too. There has never been one that went without witness testimony until this one. This one is an absolute anomaly. Did you see the witnesses from the house investigation being sworn in for the Senate trial? I guess I missed that.
Face it, you wanted Trumpp to get away with it. Nobody knows what Bolton would say. People who want the truth would want to hear it.
You really do not respect the American trial system at all. Manipulate it to serve Trump and you are squirting in your jeans.

 

[Scut Farkus]

Why do you do this? you are embarrassing yourself. Trump prohibited anyone on his staff, administration or anyone else from testifying or providing documentation. We were lucky that a few people respected the truth enough to tell it in the House. You are content with hiding it and lying about it.
There have been 26 impeachments in history. Judges get impeached too. There has never been one that went without witness testimony until this one. This one is an absolute anomaly. Did you see the witnesses from the house investigation being sworn in for the Senate trial? I guess I missed that.
Face it, you wanted Trumpp to get away with it. Nobody knows what Bolton would say. People who want the truth would want to hear it.
You really do not respect the American trial system at all. Manipulate it to serve Trump and you are squirting in your jeans.

the anomalies started in the house, dipshit. stfu and accept your stillborn. go bury it and say a prayer.

 

[domer76]

Apparently you failed to watch Quid-Pro-Quo Joe's video, huh?

I’ve seen it many times, cunt. Where was he making any personal gain when representing the US and allies, idiot?

Fucking moron

 

[Scut Farkus]

I’ve seen it many times, cunt. Where was he making any personal gain when representing the US and allies, idiot?

Fucking moron

keeping his kid and self out of trouble has the appearance of benefit.

 

[Scut Farkus]

No shit. that is why the debate. However, the Dems are open to witnesses and testimony. I bet even rightys understand that would solidify whatever decisions the trial makes. It would provide facts and justifications. The Repubs have to justify to all voters why they stopped us from having a full and fair trial. I think meet and greets with the voters are going to be uncomfortable. The fact that you can do something wrong and get away with it , does not mean you should. I think everyone with firing neurons knows the decision should be made by gathering all the evidence possible. The Repubs are blocking evidence.

twas the dem burden in the house to do this. they failed. republicans are voting no just to not set a precedent of shoddy impeachement diligence.

you. fucked. it. up. all. on. your. own.

own it. live it. do better next time.

 

[domer76]

keeping his kid and self out of trouble has the appearance of benefit.

Liar

 

[Nordberg]

the anomalies started in the house, dipshit. stfu and accept your stillborn. go bury it and say a prayer.

Nope. The House went by established standards. They would have loved to talk to Trumpies, but he prohibited them from talking. That is where all the problems originated. If he were innocent, Trump would have told them all. Testify away, nothing can happen.
Why do you call names and insult? Do you think that makes you look appear smarter? I can assure you it is the opposite.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

I know friend that it's perfectly OK with y'all neo-communist if Quid-Pro-Quo Joe gets a prosecutor fired who's investigating the CROOKED company that has his son Navy reject Hunter is sitting on their board of directors totally non-informed about anything company credible or of value except for his INFLUENCE with his father the Vise President of the United States. Of course that's fine & dandy among the CROOKED neo-commie Democrat mob, Who'd think anything different?

Can you try a little harder to make your case without tying yourself up in knots. You make absolutely no sense.

Joe Biden was hired by Burisma as a Legal Consultant to hire American Attorneys to help them settle their longstanding charges of Tax Fraud and Tax Evasion with the Ukraine IRS! Burisma owes the Ukraine IRS 100's of millions of dollars in unpaid Federal Income Taxes.

The OLD REGIME Ukraine Justice department was pretty much rotten to the core, and many judges under the old regime are having to be replaced, and the country struggles to find qualified lawyers to fill those seats, but as they are being filled, it has caused a shortage of qualified and experienced trial lawyers in the country.

 

[Scut Farkus]

Nope. The House went by established standards. They would have loved to talk to Trumpies, but he prohibited them from talking. That is where all the problems originated. If he were innocent, Trump would have told them all. Testify away, nothing can happen.
Why do you call names and insult? Do you think that makes you look appear smarter? I can assure you it is the opposite.

no they didn't. stop lying.