Liberals....about my "racist" moniker

TheDanold said:
I proved my point here, I had bet that the lefties would call racist over that (white guy doing blackface) while excusing the same thing done in reverse (black guy doing whiteface).
Double standard well proven.

I already stated I hate racist skinheads and I believe in equality. Note that blackascoal stated that his moniker is really a black panther and he failed to condemn them when I asked him about it.

I define a racist by someone who treats a certain race with hate or preferential treatment. I DO NOT think a racist is some guy who does white or black face as a joke (especially when it was not done as a joke anyway except against BAC as an individual and as well to prove a point), nor do I think a racist or bigot is someone who makes jokes about someone of the opposite race or sex or religion or whatever.

I guess I should have seen the smearfest coming and from the onset it sounded like the Liberals felt Christmas came early to fulfill all their wildest stereotypes.

Anyway, whatever, I know what I am and what I'm not. I am a little disappointed in you Watermark, you usually don't join the lefty mob like that.
Click to expand...

Here is what you proved here, racist:

1) You're ignorant of history
2) You don't know what racism really means
3) And yet, you are racist
4) You're married to a racist who approves of you being " a real guy" and dressing up in black face to entertain her.
5) An ignorant piece of shit racist can always find a couple of young white boys who don't know shit about shinola, to slap his ass.
 
One thing it did was open a conversation that often people avoid. Whether or not that was the intent (I think that was the intent, much like Che's image on another poster) it certainly opened a frank discussion on modern racism and its forms.

Rarely do you see any blackface or images of it in this modern age. Does it have the same power any longer? Or is it a weak insult like "cracker" is for white people?

Seriously, I want to know. It isn't something that I think often on.

"Racism" is a cultural phenomena, totally fabricated on skin colors and other ethnic differences, not based in any scientifically accepted reality. There is only one human race with, thankfully, many ethnic differences to add spice to life.
 
book121-a.jpg


minstrel.jpg


coflag10.jpg




The most horrific image of all, though :

*horror music*

















jewish_star.png



AHZ just wet himself.
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
One thing it did was open a conversation that often people avoid. Whether or not that was the intent (I think that was the intent, much like Che's image on another poster) it certainly opened a frank discussion on modern racism and its forms.

Rarely do you see any blackface or images of it in this modern age. Does it have the same power any longer? Or is it a weak insult like "cracker" is for white people?

Seriously, I want to know. It isn't something that I think often on.

"Racism" is a cultural phenomena, totally fabricated on skin colors and other ethnic differences, not based in any scientifically accepted reality. There is only one human race with, thankfully, many ethnic differences to add spice to life.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he was opening a conversation. He was doing it to prove that liberals are racists.

Whatever.

I'm saddened that young boys like Grind have this in them,. I had hoped it was not in this generation.

The rest of you are weak-assed apologists, but that I already knew and don't really care about. It's to be expected from Ron Paul fans and the like.
 
Darla said:
Yeah, he was opening a conversation. He was doing it to prove that liberals are racists.

Whatever.

I'm saddened that young boys like Grind have this in them,. I had hoped it was not in this generation.

The rest of you are weak-assed apologists, but that I already knew and don't really care about. It's to be expected from Ron Paul fans and the like.
Click to expand...
All this for what? Because I thought he did it to open a conversation?

Whatever.

I find that most people fear speaking on the subject at all, whether or not it was intended (which is what I said), it certainly opened the subject for discussion.
 
Damocles said:
All this for what? Because I thought he did it to open a conversation?

Whatever.

I find that most people fear speaking on the subject at all, whether or not it was intended (which is what I said), it certainly opened the subject for discussion.
Click to expand...

Darla I think exposed herself more than anyone with the obvious animosity she harbors to white males with that one rant she did on ib1.

It was a good way to open a discussion I thought, but she is determined to play the queen bee liberal and bully anyone through insidious methods of throwing racism charges at them to get them to agree to her PC immutable position. She has a "you're either with us or against us" mentality and isn't able to understand that there is a third view.
 
Darla said:
Yeah, he was opening a conversation. He was doing it to prove that liberals are racists.

Whatever.

I'm saddened that young boys like Grind have this in them,. I had hoped it was not in this generation.

The rest of you are weak-assed apologists, but that I already knew and don't really care about. It's to be expected from Ron Paul fans and the like.
Click to expand...

Did it ever occur to you old lady that this generation, both black and white, have no problem making jokes about each others race and still getting along?
Like do you live in a shell? Go to some comedy club and you will hear jokes about other races all the time, often black jokes about whites, only a PC tool would scream like a moron about racism and lie like hell that it shows hate or racism.

Grow the fuck up.
 
TheDanold said:
Darla I think exposed herself more than anyone with the obvious animosity she harbors to white males with that one rant she did on ib1.

It was a good way to open a discussion I thought, but she is determined to play the queen bee liberal and bully anyone through insidious methods of throwing racism charges at them to get them to agree to her PC immutable position. She has a "you're either with us or against us" mentality and isn't able to understand that there is a third view.
Click to expand...

Yes, and the "third view" is blackface.

You're an ignorant whore Dano, and just btw, you're in my generation, so stop putting on airs.
 
Darla said:
Yes, and the "third view" is blackface.
Click to expand...
No the third view is one who can find race things funny, but not use any hate or advocate superiority (like BAC does BTW).

Darla said:
You're an ignorant whore Dano, and just btw, you're in my generation, so stop putting on airs.
Click to expand...
You are a whore period, you whore the board looking to get all males to fall in line to your BS. Look at your shit you did with ib1, a fellow Liberal.
I don't try and make anyone think anything.
 
TheDanold said:
No the third view is one who can find race things funny, but not use any hate or advocate superiority (like BAC does BTW).


You are a whore period, you whore the board looking to get all males to fall in line to your BS. Look at your shit you did with ib1, a fellow Liberal.
I don't try and make anyone think anything.
Click to expand...

Dano do try and stay coherent. Your hate and anger is making you very difficult to understand and this jealous rage you have flown into on account of some perceived male attention you think I get that you don't, is just disturbing. This is a message board Dano...I'm sure in real life you could garner male attention. Try to untwist your face though, ok?

"look at your shit you with with 1b1 a fellow liberal"?

I don't march lockstep with whomever you perceive to be my political mates Dano. I am my own person with my own thoughts and I express them at will. I am part of no herd. Why don't you give it a try?
 
TheDanold said:
I just have one question for you lefties:

"Did any of you scream 'racist' when you laughed at the Movie 'White Chicks'"?


So predictable, black guy with white makeup equals funny and white guy with black makeup equals racist. Thank you very much for proving there is a double standard. :)



Now that my point is proven, the whole story is I took his moniker because I thought I could make something funny with it and ended up with nothing great, but then I thought "I bet if I just add a white lined mouth the lefties will be screaming in no time and demonstrate the double standard they all love to deny". I was surprised that it took any of them so long, until ib1 decided to call it, then all of the other Liberals fell in like the sheep they are and pretended it was racist even though none of them said anything before. Just goes to show that their reasoning is one of mob mentality.
Click to expand...

What.... the.... hell.....

White chicks was a movie about two black men going undercover as white women. It's not that they were preventing a whie women from playing those roles, the script was meant to be played out like that. Blackface was used to PREVENT black people from being on stage.
 
Damocles said:
One thing it did was open a conversation that often people avoid. Whether or not that was the intent (I think that was the intent, much like Che's image on another poster) it certainly opened a frank discussion on modern racism and its forms.

Rarely do you see any blackface or images of it in this modern age. Does it have the same power any longer? Or is it a weak insult like "cracker" is for white people?

Seriously, I want to know. It isn't something that I think often on.

"Racism" is a cultural phenomena, totally fabricated on skin colors and other ethnic differences, not based in any scientifically accepted reality. There is only one human race with, thankfully, many ethnic differences to add spice to life.
Click to expand...


Damo, there is no way that mocking a poster of color with a black face caricature can be debated as any sort of gray area.

Even those white teenagers who dressed up in blackface and reenacted the jena incident, went on to apologize for their little skit. Even they knew blackface caricature was wrong, when their skit was made public.

The anonymity of the internet may allow one to advance excuses like it was all in good fun, or that one might dress up in blackface to entertain the wife. But, in real life every single one of us knows that if we put any kind of picture or caricature of black face on the desk of a black co-worker, you would be fired within minutes.
 
Cypress said:
Damo, there is no way that mocking a poster of color with a black face caricature can be debated as any sort of gray area.

Even those white teenagers who dressed up in blackface and reenacted the jena incident, went on to apologize for their little skit. Even they knew blackface caricature was wrong, when their skit was made public.

The anonymity of the internet may allow one to advance excuses like it was all in good fun, or that one might dress up in blackface to entertain the wife. But, in real life every single one of us knows that if we put any kind of picture or caricature of black face on the desk of a black co-worker, you would be fired within minutes.
Click to expand...
I am not apologizing for the actions of another. I am pointing out that we have had a discussion of something that is rarely discussed because of it, regardless of the intent of the avatar's creator.

When you attempt to "give" me an argument rather than read what I wrote you invariably are wrong. Why do you insist on continuing doing so?

Are we having a frank discussion about racism? Other than the insistence on repeating "black face is bad", in between those posts, I find that we are. And, regardless of where it came from, find that it can be a good thing if we make it so.

That is all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top