Libertarians...Quite Possibly the Stupidest People in the World....

This isn't about economic policy, it's about history and historical events, and who is responsible for them'

That you couldn't even make that out? Makes you look really dumb, not cool, the way you think it makes you look.

Ha!

You're trying to argue that Milton Friedman is somehow responsible for Pinochet's persecution

I'm having no trouble keeping up, girl. I'm having a blast watching you trip over yourself.

Maybe you should worry a little less about me and focus a little more on not getting your ass kicked again by Damo. That was hilarious.

This thread is an instant classic.

Darla lumbers in... spews some typical bs about how Friedman never criticized Pinochet... and gets faced when the facts are shown. Really it's no different than any other thread, it's just more epic.
 
Great stuff. Thanks again. I had no idea how deep this Friedman's claws were into that Pinochet crap. It's their ideology, man. Its fundamentally flawed, and in some ways, evil to the core.

Shut the fuck up and stop your lying comrade p-ski, you know damn well that a free market ideology does not lend itself to totalitarian means, how the hell could it? It involves less government, NOT more.

Stupid fucking deceiver, Darla and BAC are just delusional, but you, you know that you are spouting lies and you do it anyway just to egg on the leftwing mob.
 
You should read Greg Grandin's Empire's Workshop.

I'll check it out.

Have you ever noticed that the freidman, grover norquist types are all about "economics" low taxes, and "free markets". Its virtually all most of their puppets blather on about. Occassionally they'll make some rhetorical nod towards civil liberties, or social justice. But, what really drives them is taxes, government regulation, and "free markets". In other words, its about money and property. Its like a religion with these kooks. And we all know that religion is dangerous, becase it breeds zombie-like parrots and clones. And, as you pointed out, what happens when the zombie-like principles of a cult religion are applied in the real world? Pinochet.

I must admit, I didn't know much about this freidman clown. Other than his name, and his association with kooky economics.
 
Ha!

You're trying to argue that Milton Friedman is somehow responsible for Pinochet's persecution

I'm having no trouble keeping up, girl. I'm having a blast watching you trip over yourself.

Maybe you should worry a little less about me and focus a little more on not getting your ass kicked again by Damo. That was hilarious.

This thread is an instant classic.

Darla lumbers in... spews some typical bs about how Friedman never criticized Pinochet... and gets faced when the facts are shown. Really it's no different than any other thread, it's just more epic.

I never made that claim, what I said was that I look to his deeds and the results of his policies, not to his words, for the truth. That is what I look to judge anyone, not just him.

I wasn't "faced" whatever that means, and anyone who knows anything about historical events in that part of that world, is aware of this.

Obviously, that leaves you out.
 
Shut the fuck up and stop your lying comrade p-ski, you know damn well that a free market ideology does not lend itself to totalitarian means, how the hell could it? It involves less government, NOT more.

Stupid fucking deceiver, Darla and BAC are just delusional, but you, you know that you are spouting lies and you do it anyway just to egg on the leftwing mob.

I'm not gay, so I find it wierd that you memorize personal information about me, that you obtained 5 years ago. Am I really that important to you?


You always do that when you get pissed.
 
I'm not gay, so I find it wierd that you memorize personal information about me, that you obtained 5 years ago. Am I really that important to you?


You always do that when you get pissed.

Dano seems to have a photographic memory. His ability to call up accurate statistics from memory is almost shocking.

The application of these facts and statistics into logical debate is where his trouble starts.
 
No I believe that someone who is aware that murders happen on account of their own policies, and does nothing, but lies about it, is a murderer. I do not believe you have to actually wield the weapon to be a murderer.

For what Friedman policy were people murdered? You have yet to offer a goddamn thing here.
 
Wow really? I totally expected you to have a firm grasp of economic theory...

/Sarcasm Off


Did you have to cut off the rest of my sentence, to try to make this seem like a funny?

I said I was aware of his kooky ecnomic theory, but you cut that part of the sentence off. I wonder why? :)
 
I never made that claim, what I said was that I look to his deeds and the results of his policies, not to his words, for the truth. That is what I look to judge anyone, not just him.

I wasn't "faced" whatever that means, and anyone who knows anything about historical events in that part of that world, is aware of this.

Obviously, that leaves you out.

You seemed pretty unaware that Friedman had criticized Pinochet, but that didn't stop you from foolishly claiming that he didn't.

There are 2 possiblities:

1) Either you are a moron who spews absurd claims without knowledge of the facts surrounding the situation.

Or

2) You are actively dishonest.


I don't know or care which one you are.

Just a little food for thought for you.
 
Bump....!

This has become a heated topic...so let's turn the tables on the Liberal mind set! Would it not be also fair to call Jane (Hanoi) Fonda a mass murderer....as she was the original Code Pink girl...and got alot of our boys needlessly killed when her antics enabled the NVA to continue the fight! I see the same results in the ME war with the antics of Code Pink...they are enabeling the terrorist...which kills alot of our boys! Just fair turn around!



Just because darla loves to call everyone who supports the war a murderer...


Well babe I also call you a murderer...hows that?
 
You seemed pretty unaware that Friedman had criticized Pinochet, but that didn't stop you from foolishly claiming that he didn't.

There are 2 possiblities:

1) Either you are a moron who spews absurd claims without knowledge of the facts surrounding the situation.

Or

2) You are actively dishonest.


I don't know or care which one you are.

Just a little food for thought for you.


Stop your self right there, little man, and find the post where I "claimed that that Friedman had not criticized Pinochet, but that didn't stop you from foolishly claiming that he didn't."

do it, then we can continue.

Go get it.

Put it up.
 
WOW! Friedman is a murderer. BAC forgot to bold the part of the article he posted that says this:

"Perhaps even a better indicator of progress, torture and extrajudicial executions began to taper off."

Friedman believed in taking power away from the government and giving it to the individual. Somehow because some radical government implemented some of his policies and some of their own, he is responisble for ever murder of that government. Calling the man a murderer is just nuts.
 
Stop your self right there, little man, and find the post where I "claimed that that Friedman had not criticized Pinochet, but that didn't stop you from foolishly claiming that he didn't."

do it, then we can continue.

Go get it.

Put it up.

You continue telling others to put it up... yet you do not. Show us how Friedman was responsible for the torture/murder etc.... show us how his policies led to those acts.
 
So your beloved Gore is thus a murderer. Along with the Clintons. For their policy with regards to Rwanda led to the murder of hundreds of thousands of people.

SF!!!!

Your on IA with her! Your on record, saying that anyone who responds to somebody who has them on IA is a moron, and idiot, and a dipshit! Wow!
 
I'll check it out.

Have you ever noticed that the freidman, grover norquist types are all about "economics" low taxes, and "free markets". Its virtually all most of their puppets blather on about. Occassionally they'll make some rhetorical nod towards civil liberties, or social justice. But, what really drives them is taxes, government regulation, and "free markets". In other words, its about money and property. Its like a religion with these kooks. And we all know that religion is dangerous, becase it breeds zombie-like parrots and clones. And, as you pointed out, what happens when the zombie-like principles of a cult religion are applied in the real world? Pinochet.

I must admit, I didn't know much about this freidman clown. Other than his name, and his association with kooky economics.

That's pretty obvious. If you read what Pinochet did (economically alone not even counting the other stuff) and believe that is anything in the neighborhood of verbatim Friedman then you have no clue about Friedman.

Yet, you still claim to know that he never talked about civil liberties. His was one of the first and most prestigious voices on the evils of the drug war.
 
Ok, in theory, the freer the market the freer the government because it means less government. But in reality, in Pinochet's Chile it meant less government involvement in business. But politically the government used an iron hand. It killed and tortured and disappeared thousands to retain it's power. Because the people who owned businesses benefited from Pinochet's economic policies they supported him and ALSO turned a blind eye to his barbarism. Even after he died tens of thousands of people who benefited economically from his regime cried for him. But any unbiased assesment of his government leads the thinking person to determine he was a totalitarian and a murderer. The US continues an embargo on Cuba for much the same thing but people like Friedman and 5 American administrations turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to Chile because the government like foreign investment and people where getting rich on the misery of the common Chilean. Hitler turned the German economy around as well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top