Librard Sunny Hostin and husband going down hard. Husband arrested . RICO law , rackteering.

[Walt]

HAHA, So, if you write a check to let's say...Best Buy for paper and printer ink, and then, you record as 'legal expense' it should be a crime because Best Buy is not a lawyer. 'That's not the same thing', whines the libtard. lol Oh but the completely stupid statement you just made is suppose to be taken seriously, right? Libtard logic on display. lol

Wouldn't you record paper and printer ink as office expenses? Office expenses would be assumed to be business expenses, so they would probably work. If you start claiming they were only used in legal cases, then you have to start proving those legal cases were business expenses, which becomes needlessly complex.

trump misused a corporations money for personal expenses. That is illegal.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

HAHA, So, if you write a check to let's say...Best Buy for paper and printer ink, and then, you record as 'legal expense' it should be a crime because Best Buy is not a lawyer. 'That's not the same thing', whines the libtard. lol Oh but the completely stupid statement you just made is suppose to be taken seriously, right? Libtard logic on display. lol

I don't even understand your example. Are you saying payments to a mistress are a legitimate business expense like paper an printer ink? Can you explain how a mistress is used in the business.

It is incumbent upon a business owner to try to accurately record their business expenses. Accidentally recording one valid business expense like paper and printer ink under the wrong category would not be a crime since there would be no intent. There would be no reason to purposely record paper and printer ink as legal expenses since paper and printer ink are a valid business expense.

 

[TOP]

She's an "attorney", so he'll be just fine...

 

[Diogenes]

Do people not know how to perform due diligence?

Hostin's hubby is one of 200 defendants in a civil suit.

Nobody is "going down hard". Certainly not Dr. Hostin's wife, who isn't a defendant.

 

[Walt]

She's an "attorney", so he'll be just fine...

Being an attorney does not magically protect people from being convicted of a crime. But not being accused of a crime does protect them from being convicted.

 

[Walt]

You win the smartest comment by a libtard this week. I know the average drone can't understand that you kind of made my point for me. The drones all live in a 'post truth society'. So, I was demonstrating absurdity by being absurd. ( another nod to the great Rush Limbaugh ) Again, Congratulations!

Telling the truth is over the top, absurd behavior to you?

 

[Walt]

Do people not know how to perform due diligence?

Hostin's hubby is one of 200 defendants in a civil suit.

Nobody is "going down hard". Certainly not Dr. Hostin's wife, who isn't a defendant.

How did no one catch this?

 

[Diogenes]

How did no one catch this?

I seem to have caught it, Salty Walty.

 

[AProudLefty]

I enjoy how @Legion tries to stay relevant.

 

[Walt]

I seem to have caught it, Salty Walty.

After I already caught it, but yes, you did catch it.

What still surprises me is that we did not catch that fake photo of Disney dwarves. That is such low production, from such a high production Disney movie... I must not have seen it for some reason.

 

[Diogenes]

What still surprises me is that we did not catch that fake photo of Disney dwarves. That is such low production, from such a high production Disney movie... I must not have seen it for some reason.

Disney has not yet released the live-action "Snow White" remake. The film is scheduled to be released in theaters on March 21, 2025.

@Grok

Disney went woke, Walty.

 

[Walt]

Disney has not yet released the live-action "Snow White" remake. The film is scheduled to be released in theaters on March 21, 2025.

@Grok

Disney went woke, Walty.

They have released the previews. Your argument has fallen apart.

 

[Diogenes]

After I already caught it, but yes, you did catch it.

I don't bother with a lot of @Stone's threads, TBH. I only glanced at it yesterday. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

 

[Diogenes]

They have released the previews. Your argument has fallen apart.

I didn't make any argument, Walty. I posted a fact.

 

[Stone]

I always feel sorry to have to factcheck you guys. You seem to enjoy your fantasies so much.

You mean like the fantasy you had when you said Kamala would win in a landslide? You mean like THAT ?

 

[Stone]

Yeah,...that's why YOU are LITERALLY IN the thread and actively POSTING IN IT. Wow,...talk about zero self awareness. Senile much?

 

[Stone]

I don't bother with a lot of @Stone's threads, TBH. I only glanced at it yesterday. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

 

[TOP]

Being an attorney does not magically protect people from being convicted of a crime. But not being accused of a crime does protect them from being convicted.

She can defend him... I'm sure they've never discussed his business...or benefited from the fraud...

 

[Walt]

You mean like the fantasy you had when you said Kamala would win in a landslide? You mean like THAT ?

I did think Harris would win, but I also knew it would be close. I was certainly right about it being close.

You keep going on about trump winning the popular vote by a landslide, even after we know he could not even get a majority.

 

[Walt]

She can defend him... I'm sure they've never discussed his business...or benefited from the fraud...

What fraud?

The insurance company's lawyers are defending him, and more particularly themselves. Bringing in another lawyer would generally be a mistake. Why do you think he would want to do that?