LMAO!!! Im on FAKE ignore by the nutter lefties.
- Thread starter Stone
- Start date
Powder residue makes matching a bullet (including fragmented bullets) to a particular firearm much easier, you fucking idiot!
TOP
Retired Teacher
Indeed. .He fell out of bed on the angry side again...
Happens every day...
(You're going to get reported for stealing that picture...
)
TOP
Retired Teacher
Isn't that the truth...I've been reported before. It's how cowards roll...
TOP
Retired Teacher
And just like that.......POOF!,...I MADE them respond. Quite effective indeed....
And it continues...
Beautiful beach...lucky you!!No, you stupid fuck. No firearms examiner goes about performing powder residues to match a projectile to a weapon. They match test fires to the questioned round, you fucking idiot.
Really, cumsack, you need to stop. Even I am starting to feel sorry for you.
You can't do it with a hollow point, stupid fuck. They practically disintegrate, especially if they hit a bone.
No need to feel sorry for me,you incompetent twit, you spend enough time feeling sorry for yourself.
Really, fucktard, you need to stop. I’m serious. You’re publicly shitting yourself and don’t even know it.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
While both of you seem to be arguing out in the weeds at times, RB is correct that matching powder residue on a gun and a fired bullet (including fragments) are additional evidence. Matching the manufacturer to each is additional evidence for trial.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
How big of a coward do you believe Ms. “Two Rules” to be for all of her reports on me? Goat?I've been reported before. It's how cowards roll...
No, it’s not “additional evidence”, whatever that means. Do you really believe that bullet fragments pulled from a victim has sufficient powder residues to determine whether it came from a Federal, Hornady or Remington round? Especially since any one weapon could have been used to fire a variety of rounds, including home loads.
What fictional crime dramas are you guys watching? And what relevance is the manufacturer, anyway?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The more you post statements like that, the more I’m learning about your critical thinking skills, Domer.
Yes, it can, but only those who understand what “additional evidence” means would understand it. Obviously the evidence found would have to be corroborated with evidence proving the shooter possessed such rounds.
The fact you don’t understand why matching the manufacturer of the weapon, the ammunition, the bullets themselves are important to the prosecution of a case, then I can’t help you, Domer.
The more you post statements like that, the more I’m learning about your critical thinking skills, Domer.
Yes, it can, but only those who understand what “additional evidence” means would understand it. Obviously the evidence found would have to be corroborated with evidence proving the shooter possessed such rounds.
The fact you don’t understand why matching the manufacturer of the weapon, the ammunition, the bullets themselves are important to the prosecution of a case, then I can’t help you, Domer.
And exactly what test, do you suppose, one that would stand scientific scrutiny, would be used to state “beyond a reasonable scientific doubt” that a projectile fragment that could not be connected to a weapon was the same brand of ammunition as possessed by the suspect based on powder analysis?
I’ll wait.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Scientfic tests that could not connect bullet fragments or powder to a weapon? Off hand, the taste test, the opinion test, the touch test and the insert-in-the-rectum test.
Just as I thought. Neither you or RB have a clue. Merely tossing out guesses and not very good ones.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I answered your question, Domer.
At this time I’m listing you as suspected of mental issues and/or simply young, angry and stupid.