London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!

WTC cameras, locks, electricity turned off weekend before 9/11

Many of us can’t believe explosives were placed in the World Trade Center because it would be impossible to “sneak” them in with so many people watching.

This assumes a lot of things. First, it assumes that people are paying attention when “work” is going on in the Trade Center. Secondly, and more importantly, it assumes that even if people raise questions that someone is going to listen to them.

Scott Forbes, who was a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, located on the 97th floor of the South Tower received a remarkable notice three weeks before the 9/11 attacks. The Port Authority of New York informed his company that there would be a “power down” on the weekend of Sept. 8 and 9, 2001. This would mean that all power would be off in the top half of the south tower for most of the weekend.

Forbes has called this unprecedented, because to have a data centre lose power for two days requires major preparations and disruption. He reports that as part of the power down, all security cameras and security door locks were non-operational for about 36 hours.

“Remember there were no security locks on doors or security cameras, so access was free unless a door was locked by a manual key. Seeing so many ‘strangers’ who didn’t work at the WTC was unusual,” Forbes said.

The work was claimed to be part of an upgrade to the Internet service in the building. No one has explained why this work required a complete cutting of electricity.

“There were guys in work clothes with huge tool boxes and reels of cable walking around the building that weekend,” he said.

There had also been a heightened security level at the towers for two weeks because of several alleged phone threats. The extra security, which included bomb-sniffing dogs, was removed on Sept. 6.

Forbes wrote to the Port Authority and to the 9/11 Commission to bring his suspicions about the power down to their attention. He never received any acknowledgement of his letters, and no mention of any of this made it into the 9/11 Commission Report.
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.c...ks-electricity-turned-off-weekend-before-911/

Just one of many reports about suspicious actions just before 9/11 .. but let's get real. The reports could come from the lips of Jesus and you won't believe them.

Does falling mass seek the path of least resistance?

You're just running from the truth.

Pics of the interior of a large building prepped for implosion....

885_BOU_lnSCIAAoE7V.jpg
075-full.jpg


Pretty hard to hide....
 
Oh no .. not America !!!

Operation Northwoods: Generals approved domestic terror ‘false flag’ that was a blueprint for*9/11

A massive and spectacular terrorist attack.

Civilians killed on American soil. Explosives planted to simulate an assault from an external enemy. American cities attacked, including Washington, D.C. Military targets hit. Civil aircraft hijacked. Wreckage planted. Evidence manufactured.

You might assume I’m talking about 9/11, the most devastating false flag “terror attack” in history. But I’m not. I’m talking about Operation Northwoods, which you will hear barely anything about in the mainstream media.

The plan was approved by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and presented to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962 in a top secret memorandum. The idea of the plan was to launch a campaign of terror against American citizens to trick them into supporting an invasion of Cuba. The goal was to oust Castro just three years after he took power in a revolution. And were it not for Kennedy’s refusal, the operation would have gone ahead.

The memorandum makes it very clear that the purpose was to fabricate a fake threat:
“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

As part of what they would claim was a “Communist Cuban terror campaign,” the Joint Chiefs wanted to murder civilians, blow up a plane painted to look like a civilian airliner, sink a military ship, sink a boat full of Cuban refugees, and even fake an attack on their own naval base in Guantanamo Bay. All blamed on Cuba. The memo even described the sinking of the military ship as a “Remember the Maine” incident, referring to the U.S.S. Maine, which exploded in Havana harbor in 1898 giving the U.S. “justification” for starting the Spanish-American War.

The thing about Operation Northwoods is that it’s not a theory, it’s a fact.

The memorandum confirming this was declassified by order of the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board in 1997. They show that Joint Chiefs Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer proposed the plan and that all members of the Joint Chiefs had signed on. Kennedy’s refusal to give his approval further angered the military leadership, which still blamed him for the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion the year before.

Northwoods may be the most important piece of U.S. history that most Americans have never heard of because it shows us that the claim that 9/11 was a false flag pulled off by the U.S. government (and possibly other governments) isn’t the least bit far-fetched. Once you know about this operation, it becomes much harder to ridicule the idea of 9/11 as first and foremost a massive and deadly deception by a government against its own people.

In fact, the operation was virtually a dry run for 9/11 and eerily anticipated both the violence against domestic civilian targets we saw on Sept. 11, 2001, and the deception that led the world to believe that the “attack” had been carried out by America’s enemy du jour. Exit Communist Cuba, enter Islamic extremists. Both operations show that those in positions of military power were prepared to put on a spectacular show to achieve their anti-democratic objectives.

Under Northwoods, the U.S. government would:

Hijack civil aircraft
Stage a fake attack (with “friendly” Cubans) on U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Capture fake soldiers simulating an attack on the base
Start riots near the entrance to the base
Blow up ammunition inside the base and start fires
Set fire to aircraft inside the base
Lob mortar shells into the base from outside – cause some damage to installations
Capture fake assault teams approaching from the sea
Capture militia group that storms the base
Sabotage large ship in the harbour – start large fires
Sink ship near entrance to the harbour – conduct mock funerals of victims
Blow up U.S. naval vessel in Guantanamo Bay
Blow up an unmanned drone ship in Cuban waters
Follow that with a “rescue” mission to retrieve non-existent crew
Plant fake Soviet explosive device
Develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington
Sink boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated)
Foster attempts on the lives of Cuban refugees in the U.S., wounding some
Make it appear that Castro was subverting other countries in the region
Detonate plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots
Arrest Cuban agents (In the memo they wrote: “… release prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would* be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government”)
Fake Cuban messages to Communist underground in the Dominican Republic
Use fake MIGs flown by U.S. pilots
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/operation-northwoods-blueprint-for-911/

8 months later .. Kennedy was assassinated.
 
Pics of the interior of a large building prepped for implosion....

885_BOU_lnSCIAAoE7V.jpg
075-full.jpg


Pretty hard to hide....

Don't get this twisted good brother. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I support your right to believe anything you choose to believe .. no matter how blind that might be.

But the truth of this has already been revealed in the question no swallower can even touch .. including you.

Falling mass does not just keep falling when encountering greater mass. Pretty sure you know that .. and it proves that everything you think you know about 9/11 is a lie.

There are a thousand questions that you can't answer .. so you'll just keep moving to another question. :0) .. and I'm good with that.

.. but it's hard to claim that republicans, religious fanatics, Wicans, or anybody else are delusional and controlled when you can't see the nose on your face.

No disrespect intended.

Take the red pill.
 
Last edited:
This thread will end as all these threads end .. with swallowers slinking away with their tails between their legs.

no, brother. I do not think they will. they will adamantly hold on to their mistaken and unscientific beliefs because to do otherwise would literally remove their foundation of belief in government. we could show them video of the charges and they would defiantly claim it's doctored.
 
I'll say it again, I have a degree in this science, and I knew that the towers would fall when I was watching the 9/11 event unfold on television. The mechanisms why are 100% fact based and simple to understand. Yet liberal retards refuse to learn, just like they refuse to learn economics and history.

what science would that be?
 
Don't get this twisted good brother. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I support your right to believe anything you choose to believe .. no matter how blind that might be.

But the truth of this has already been revealed in the question no swallower can even touch .. including you.

Falling mass does not just keep falling when encountering greater mass. Pretty sure you know that .. and it proves that everything you think you know about 9/11 is a lie.

There are a thousand questions that you can't answer .. so you'll just keep moving to another question. :0) .. and I'm good with that.

.. but it's hard to claim that republicans, religious fanatics, Wicans, or anybody else are delusional and controlled when you can't see the nose on your face.

No disrespect intended.

Take the red pill.

F = ma (force = mass x acceleration)

"This equation is one of the most useful in classical physics. It is a concise statement of Isaac Newton's Second Law of Motion, holding both the proportions and vectors of the Second Law. It translates as: The net force on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by the acceleration of the object."

As the mass of the upper floors began to fall straight down, they accelerated creating much greater force than just their weight alone. The farther they fell, the more they accelerated and the more force they carried.

Same reason a bullet fired from a gun does extensive damage to a target while a bullet dropped or thrown or just sitting in place does no damage whatsoever.
 
no, brother. I do not think they will. they will adamantly hold on to their mistaken and unscientific beliefs because to do otherwise would literally remove their foundation of belief in government. we could show them video of the charges and they would defiantly claim it's doctored.

They're already running out of steam.

True, they will cling to the mindfuck for dear life as long as they live. Jesus couldn't convince them of the truth.

But convincing them of truth is not the goal, not the point.

Speaking the truth is the point. The evolution of this issue has changed dramatically since 9/11. More and more Americans have become aware of the truth, although not all have the courage to speak it.

Continue to speak truth my friend .. let that truth fall where it may.
 
F = ma (force = mass x acceleration)

"This equation is one of the most useful in classical physics. It is a concise statement of Isaac Newton's Second Law of Motion, holding both the proportions and vectors of the Second Law. It translates as: The net force on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by the acceleration of the object."

As the mass of the upper floors began to fall straight down, they accelerated creating much greater force than just their weight alone. The farther they fell, the more they accelerated and the more force they carried.

Same reason a bullet fired from a gun does extensive damage to a target while a bullet dropped or thrown or just sitting in place does no damage whatsoever.

Good thing for copy and paste huh? You sure as shit do not understand what any that means Jethro.
 
F = ma (force = mass x acceleration)

"This equation is one of the most useful in classical physics. It is a concise statement of Isaac Newton's Second Law of Motion, holding both the proportions and vectors of the Second Law. It translates as: The net force on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by the acceleration of the object."

As the mass of the upper floors began to fall straight down, they accelerated creating much greater force than just their weight alone. The farther they fell, the more they accelerated and the more force they carried.

Same reason a bullet fired from a gun does extensive damage to a target while a bullet dropped or thrown or just sitting in place does no damage whatsoever.

Post an example of that.

Let's see a smaller object dropped from wherever continue to crash through a much larger object.

Let's see falling mass that does not seek the path of least resistance.

Even water does that.

'The path of least resistance is the physical or metaphorical pathway that provides the least resistance to forward motion by a given object or entity, among a set of alternative paths.'

The path of least resistance is always air, not through greater objects.
 
This thread will end as all these threads end .. with swallowers slinking away with their tails between their legs.

Are you sure you're not projecting the "swallowers" and "slinking" labels; because it appears that quite a few posters have provided logical and documented rebuttals to your conjecture and assumptions.

:dealwithit:
 
This a report about WTC Building 7:

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf

See table 5.2 on page 5-14. There was a 6000 gallon "day tank" (fuel) located between the second and third floors. This is in addition to 24,000 gallons of fuel storage located under the loading dock at the ground level

Wait for it




Wait for it




Wait for it




PROVE THAT THEY HAD FUEL IN THEM THAT DAY

Now, wasn't that worth the wait?

:evilnod:
 
Question: A controlled demolition requires extensive set up operations. Prior to setting and wiring the explosive charges, a lot of smaller scale manual demolition has to take place. Often times, parts of exterior walls have to be removed, interior walls torn out and holes drilled into ground floor columns to provide places to plant the explosives. Then, miles of electrical wiring have to be strung from charge to charge, out the door or some other opening to a location safely away from the fall area where the debris will land.

The process takes several days and a crew of several people, even for a building a fraction of the size of WTC, which was open and doing regular business even on the morning of the attack.

How come none of the 3,000 people who died in the towers that day didn't see all of the preparation work and dust and personel required to accomplish such a task, as they came to and from work, not only that day, but on the days leading up to 9/11?

How did they hide what they were doing from the public?

It was all done during the construction and then hidden from everyone.

This was all planned during the Nixon administration and it was detonated as a protest to him having to leave office.

He just wanted to wait 27 years, 1 month, and 5 days, to throw any suspicion off himself.

Plus most of the other conspirators had died.

:evilnod:
 
Last edited:
But unfortunately for you, is was and is relevant.

You just couldn't realize that your own "logic" would be used to prove you wrong.

:dealwithi:

no, your shit was totally irrelevant because it's incomparable. don't even try it. you sound like 'the dude' and his bullshit college talk. it's like apples and oranges. the ONLY way the odds of two buildings coming straight down could be the same as two planes slamming in to two buildings would be because it was planned that way. is that what you meant????
 
Back
Top