London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!

Right said:
Engineering, emphasis on structures and forensics.
Click to expand...

and you're seriously going to sit there and try to tell me that engineering and structure forensics for these two buildings was SO EXACT!!!!!!! that it could be built to fall straight down in upon itself no matter the cause of the damage??????
 
blackascoal said:
I don't frequent any 9/11 site dummy. This information is available everywhere and much of what I've posted is in my 9/11 folder .. which is extensive.

Your dumb ass can't keep up, so now you're whining about how I post.

How about this grandma .. off to the Stank Hole of Ignored Assholes you go.

Nice knowing ya' :0)
Click to expand...

That would make you a PUSSY - according to domer.
 
blackascoal said:
WTC cameras, locks, electricity turned off weekend before 9/11

Many of us can’t believe explosives were placed in the World Trade Center because it would be impossible to “sneak” them in with so many people watching.

This assumes a lot of things. First, it assumes that people are paying attention when “work” is going on in the Trade Center. Secondly, and more importantly, it assumes that even if people raise questions that someone is going to listen to them.

Scott Forbes, who was a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, located on the 97th floor of the South Tower received a remarkable notice three weeks before the 9/11 attacks. The Port Authority of New York informed his company that there would be a “power down” on the weekend of Sept. 8 and 9, 2001. This would mean that all power would be off in the top half of the south tower for most of the weekend.

Forbes has called this unprecedented, because to have a data centre lose power for two days requires major preparations and disruption. He reports that as part of the power down, all security cameras and security door locks were non-operational for about 36 hours.

“Remember there were no security locks on doors or security cameras, so access was free unless a door was locked by a manual key. Seeing so many ‘strangers’ who didn’t work at the WTC was unusual,” Forbes said.

The work was claimed to be part of an upgrade to the Internet service in the building. No one has explained why this work required a complete cutting of electricity.

“There were guys in work clothes with huge tool boxes and reels of cable walking around the building that weekend,” he said.

There had also been a heightened security level at the towers for two weeks because of several alleged phone threats. The extra security, which included bomb-sniffing dogs, was removed on Sept. 6.

Forbes wrote to the Port Authority and to the 9/11 Commission to bring his suspicions about the power down to their attention. He never received any acknowledgement of his letters, and no mention of any of this made it into the 9/11 Commission Report.
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.c...ks-electricity-turned-off-weekend-before-911/

Just one of many reports about suspicious actions just before 9/11 .. but let's get real. The reports could come from the lips of Jesus and you won't believe them.

Does falling mass seek the path of least resistance?

You're just running from the truth.
Click to expand...

Don't forget, that no Jews went to work in the towers that day. :good4u:
 
Last edited:
USFREEDOM911 said:
Are you sure you're not projecting the "swallowers" and "slinking" labels; because it appears that quite a few posters have provided logical and documented rebuttals to your conjecture and assumptions.

:dealwithit:
Click to expand...

except they're not. they're the musings of lesser minds parroting what they've been told by their government.
 
blackascoal said:
Post an example of that.

Let's see a smaller object dropped from wherever continue to crash through a much larger object.

Let's see falling mass that does not seek the path of least resistance.

Even water does that.

'The path of least resistance is the physical or metaphorical pathway that provides the least resistance to forward motion by a given object or entity, among a set of alternative paths.'

The path of least resistance is always air, not through greater objects.
Click to expand...

Are you now suggesting that the top floors were lighter and smaller then the floors under them; because that would be the only way your presentation would have any chance of being fact?
 
blackascoal said:
Fake science .. proving that he has no degree in science.

NOBODY expected those buildings to fall because such an occurrence has NEVER, EVER, EVER happened before in the history of Man, Fire, or Buildings.
Click to expand...

And that's why you so fearfully cling to your conjectures and opinions; because you can't except the fact that it did happen, even though no such occurrence had never happened before.

The moon landing must not have occurred either, seeing as how it had happened prior or after. :palm:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and you're seriously going to sit there and try to tell me that engineering and structure forensics for these two buildings was SO EXACT!!!!!!! that it could be built to fall straight down in upon itself no matter the cause of the damage??????
Click to expand...

How did you get that out of the mans occupation?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
no, your shit was totally irrelevant because it's incomparable. don't even try it. you sound like 'the dude' and his bullshit college talk. it's like apples and oranges. the ONLY way the odds of two buildings coming straight down could be the same as two planes slamming in to two buildings would be because it was planned that way. is that what you meant????
Click to expand...

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

What ever helps you sleep at night, just beware of the black helicopters. :good4u:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and you're seriously going to sit there and try to tell me that engineering and structure forensics for these two buildings was SO EXACT!!!!!!! that it could be built to fall straight down in upon itself no matter the cause of the damage??????
Click to expand...

Do you have something that would show it was built, with the expectation of it falling??
 
blackascoal said:
Post an example of that.

Let's see a smaller object dropped from wherever continue to crash through a much larger object.

Let's see falling mass that does not seek the path of least resistance.

Even water does that.

'The path of least resistance is the physical or metaphorical pathway that provides the least resistance to forward motion by a given object or entity, among a set of alternative paths.'

The path of least resistance is always air, not through greater objects.
Click to expand...

Each individual floor beneath the falling mass was one individual entity which, by itself, was no match for the force of the falling mass above it.

As the mass fell, each successive floor gave way to the force of the mass crashing into it from above.

As that mass fell through one floor after another after another, it continued to accelerate, aquiring even more force and more mass until it appeared to be in free fall.
 
Nomad said:
Each individual floor beneath the falling mass was one individual entity which, by itself, was no match for the force of the falling mass above it.

As the mass fell, each successive floor gave way to the force of the mass crashing into it from above.

As that mass fell through one floor after another after another, it continued to accelerate, aquiring even more force and more mass until it appeared to be in free fall.
Click to expand...

It appears that BAC doesn't believe that when a moving car crashes into a car standing still, that the car standing still will move or suffer any damage.

:facepalm:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
are you now going to tell us that the government of the united states has never and would never misuse it's power and authority by killing innocent civilians for some other gain???????
Click to expand...

Let's contain the conversation to the supposed WTC attacks. Tell us the story about how the government pulled it off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top