Government propaganda sites are not a proof.
That's science. Where's your science? Your personal feelings are not science.
Government propaganda sites are not a proof.
Not a fact. Your religion.
How would we be more energy independent to get more oil from Canada? We are still an net exporter of energy.
I do not know mantra 40a. Random shit from you.
That's science. Where's your science? Your personal feelings are not science.
That is a fact and is the central tenet of supply and demand.
So you're not arguing with me, you're foolishly arguing with capitalism.
We The People don't export ANYTHING.
Every single drop of oil extracted from under our feet belongs solely and exclusively to the multinational oil company that extracted it, and they extract the exact amount necessary to achieve the highest possible profit margin, no more no less.
Then, they sell that oil to whomever they want for however much or little they want.
We The People only own what is in the strategic reserve, everything else belongs to oil companies and is sold globally.
There isn't a single oil company that would increase production to the benefit of lower prices to consumers because that drives down the price per barrel by adding to the supply.
So it is NEVER in an oil company's interest to increase production because doing so will drive down the price and thus, drive down their profits.
Science is not a government propaganda site.
ITN spams the board with random shit because he doesn't believe a single thing he says here and cannot defend any of it.
You obviously are completely unaware of local producers.
You still have no clue of markets.
Inversion fallacy.
And it isn't, so are you avoiding it because you have no science of your own to counter it with?
Local producers are still private corporations that control everything they extract, and they will only extract the exact amount of oil necessary to achieve the highest possible profit margins, no more no less.
The business interests of oil companies run in direct conflict with the interests of consumers; the more oil that is extracted, the lower the price, but the lower the profits.
That is the dissonance at the heart of your "argument" here...and I put it in quotations because it's not much of an argument, it's just contrarianism that masks insecurity and emptiness.
Then educate me.
Go ahead.
I dare you.
But you gotta show your work which you will never do because you don't believe in anything, so you have no work to show.
The reason you use the fallacy excuse is because you can't provide a legitimate counter-argument due to the fact that you don't believe in anything.
I don't have to counter a void.
Still can't get yer head wrapped around markets..
RQAA.
It is YOUR fallacies. Not mine. Inversion fallacy. Psychoquackery. Trolling.