Mara Lago to be liquidated?

And since you can NEVER develop it or change it use from a "Resort", which Trump purposely got it classified as to save on tax money, you have ZERO speculative value based on redevelopment into high end homes and condos, etc, which is where all the top value lies.


Instead, it would be valued as any company would be where the only thing the buyer can EVER get from it is Revenue and Profit. So you value it in the same way you would buying a McDonalds franchise. How much Revenue does it generate and how much profit hits the bottom line and what multiple do i want to pay for that Revenue stream as that is how i will get paid back.

Irrelevant.
 
In PmP's case it is made all the more absurd due to him claiming to be a lawyer, even if just a slumlord lawyer.


I want to say it is not possible, someone so incapable of getting any issue of law correct could be a lawyer, but then Alina Habba and the Kraken lady exist and he shows similar legal prowess.

I think he was lying, not duped, but who knows.
 
This is fact, being an Historic Landmark makes it less valuable. It would be worth a lot more if it could be torn down and beach front condos built.

When Trump was given Mar-A-Lago by the Federal Government, he agreed to restore it and to give up any rights to redevelopment. That took away the bulk of the value of the land.

Irrelevant. Avarice. The federal government did not give the property to Trump.
 
LIES.


Because there was not sole reliance does not mean there was not reliance and the Banker admitted had Trump been fully disclosing with the data the bankers are now seeing and Trump had and knew, HE WOULD NOT have got the loans.

You are making shit up again.
 
So? What is the point?

The fact you haven't understood up to this point means you are unable to ever understand it, Sybil. Just know that I will never support a lying, draft-dodging adulterous pedophile like Donald J. Trump even if my life depended upon it.

7zzo6m.jpg
 
Only you are stupid enough to say it is a 'denial' to ask a person to cite a claim they are saying the Judge made a ruling (public doc) and yet they are not quoting it or showing it but continue to claim it exists.

No one is obligated to believe the lies you will not substantiate.


It is up to you to 'prove', and until you do, he is not denying anything.

everyone who has read the judge's decision knows it.......even Jarhead.......he's just lying about.......you obviously have never read it......finding it is beyond your skill set......
 
Blatant stupidity seems to be your only hope.

The judge is quoting the tax assessments over a 10 year period that were presented in court as evidence of what the assessments were in Florida for tax purposes.

what the assessments were for tax purposes are irrelevant to the issue of what the fair market value of the property is.......sorry.....
 
The fact you haven't understood up to this point means you are unable to ever understand it, Sybil. Just know that I will never support a lying, draft-dodging adulterous pedophile like Donald J. Trump even if my life depended upon it.

Your hallucinations are getting worse, Sock.
 
what the assessments were for tax purposes are irrelevant to the issue of what the fair market value of the property is.......sorry.....

But what Trump put in writing and filed in a court to try and get that tax assessment lower IS NOT IRRELEVANT.


Trump CANNOT file 'this property is worth less than $16MM as i signed away all future re-development rights for residential and as a resort the value is far less'...

And also

Trump CANNOT then file docs with Banks and Insurers saying 'This property is worth far more. Hundreds of Millions, or over a billion as the redevelopment rights it has are very valuable'.


If you knew anything about real estate and representations you would understand that is fraud.

So it is NOT the tax assessed value that is being used but is Trumps written and filed DECLARATION he made based on the tax assessment.

And once again you know the rule of you not commenting on legal issues. So stop.
 
My hallucinations are getting worse. Ask my socks.
Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.
Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.
bigotry, bulverism,

Sybil isn't here.
Sybil isn't here.
Is Sybil transgender?
Answer the question, Terry.
Hope Terry, I mean, Dutch Uncle doesn't notice... Whoopsie.
So, are you saying that Terry (aka Dutch), is an example of AUI (Artificial UnIntelligence)?
----
@ Terry, I warned you about taxing your brain stem.
Now, now Terry, just because you only have a brain stem
Answer the question, Terry. When did I state my position on the Big Bang?
Do you take medication for your schizophrenia, Sybil?
 
Since Biden's beach house was most likely bought with bribery money will it be seized by the government.

Fucking stupid comment untill you find some evidence of such a bribe and there isn't any. 20 fucking years of searching and they have found none. Fucking dumbshits like you like to believe it but it is common knowledge that Biden is about as ethical and stand up a president as this country has ever had.
 
what the assessments were for tax purposes are irrelevant to the issue of what the fair market value of the property is.......sorry.....

When the judge is giving the assessed value determined in Florida for tax purposes in his ruling, then it is pretty relevant when you try to argue the judge is making up the valuation.
Your argument is not a legal argument since it ignores the facts in the case.
 
Back
Top