Marxism is the never-ending boogeyman of the right

[IBDaMann]

Geekio just doesn't get the difference between getting a budget that has a surplus and the overall debt owed.

Yes, as a result, he conflates "paying down" the debt with "paying off" the debt.

Anyway, he is obviously an uneducated schlep so let's pity him and continue to offer to help.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
For your education:


https://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/th...under-clinton/

https://potus-geeks.livejournal.com/1310438.html

The deficit / surplus is the amount of money coming into the government that year versus spending. That isn't the national debt.

Clinton (and the Republican Congress) balanced the budget and got a surplus. They didn't eliminate federal debt.

No shit sherlock....you should have read carefully and comprehensively the content of my links.


Some readers wrote to us saying we should have made clear the difference between the federal deficit and the federal debt. A deficit occurs when the government takes in less money than it spends in a given year. The debt is the total amount the government owes at any given time. So the debt goes up in any given year by the amount of the deficit, or it decreases by the amount of any surplus. The debt the government owes to the public decreased for a while under Clinton, but the debt was by no means erased.


Other readers have noted a USA Today story stating that, under an alternative type of accounting, the final four years of the Clinton administration taken together would have shown a deficit. This is based on an annual document called the “Financial Report of the U.S. Government,” which reports what the governments books would look like if kept on an accrual basis like those of most corporations, rather than the cash basis that the government has always used. The principal difference is that under accrual accounting the government would book immediately the costs of promises made to pay future benefits to government workers and Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries. But even under accrual accounting, the annual reports showed surpluses of $69.2 billion in fiscal 1998, $76.9 billion in fiscal 1999, and $46 billion for fiscal year 2000. So even if the government had been using that form of accounting the deficit would have been erased for those three years.


You can wiggle, you can dance, but all that MAGA BS will still end up in your pants.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Nazis were people who were a part of National Socialism, or socialists, which means that Nazis were indeed fascists. Try looking up
Hitler's companionship with and ideological makeup with the world's number one fascist....Mussolini, and then try to tell us that
Nazis were right wing fascists. Either grow up and accept the truth, or just keep being the uninformed idiot that you tend to be.

Racist, fascist assholes are heavy into revisionism.....they love to redefine words, phrases and terminology to suit their needs. So what the Nazi's and Mussolini say, given the historical record, are nothing but a piss in the wind.

Interesting how you seem to parrot their mindset....inadvertently proving the thread subject title and OP.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Trained Marxists started BLM which stated goal is destruction of the nuclear family unit.


“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

trained self aggrandizing idiots is more like it. A good idea against systematic racism in police depts. tarnished by those who think they are "that" smart...pity they know NOTHING of the Civil Rights movement that made it possible for their silly asses to go to school, because THOSE heroes SOUNDLY REJECTED marxism's flaws.

One doesn't have to be a marxist to recognize systematic racism in any venue.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

No shit sherlock....you should have read carefully and comprehensively the content of my links.


Some readers wrote to us saying we should have made clear the difference between the federal deficit and the federal debt. A deficit occurs when the government takes in less money than it spends in a given year. The debt is the total amount the government owes at any given time. So the debt goes up in any given year by the amount of the deficit, or it decreases by the amount of any surplus. The debt the government owes to the public decreased for a while under Clinton, but the debt was by no means erased.


Other readers have noted a USA Today story stating that, under an alternative type of accounting, the final four years of the Clinton administration taken together would have shown a deficit. This is based on an annual document called the “Financial Report of the U.S. Government,” which reports what the governments books would look like if kept on an accrual basis like those of most corporations, rather than the cash basis that the government has always used. The principal difference is that under accrual accounting the government would book immediately the costs of promises made to pay future benefits to government workers and Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries. But even under accrual accounting, the annual reports showed surpluses of $69.2 billion in fiscal 1998, $76.9 billion in fiscal 1999, and $46 billion for fiscal year 2000. So even if the government had been using that form of accounting the deficit would have been erased for those three years.


You can wiggle, you can dance, but all that MAGA BS will still end up in your pants.

Republicans are red, Democrats are blue, you're still an idiot, too bad for you.

The budget deficit or surplus is different from the national DEBT. Stinky Gekko has confused the two repeatedly. As I've stated several times now, Clinton and the Republican Congress were able to balance the budget and get a surplus for a year or two. They didn't eliminate the national debt.

 

[Mason Michaels]

Nazis were people who were a part of National Socialism, or socialists, which means that Nazis were indeed fascists. Try looking up
Hitler's companionship with and ideological makeup with the world's number one fascist....Mussolini, and then try to tell us that
Nazis were right wing fascists. Either grow up and accept the truth, or just keep being the uninformed idiot that you tend to be.

Nazis were Fascist,right wing ,their biggest enemy in Germany that they fought on the streets were Communist, don't get more left than Communism

 

[IBDaMann]

One doesn't have to be a marxist to recognize systematic racism in any venue.

Those who claim to see "systematic racism" are usually delusionals who exist only to claim seeing it.

 

[Libhater]

Racist, fascist assholes are heavy into revisionism.....they love to redefine words, phrases and terminology to suit their needs. So what the Nazi's and Mussolini say, given the historical record, are nothing but a piss in the wind.

Interesting how you seem to parrot their mindset....inadvertently proving the thread subject title and OP.

Hitler and the #1 Fascist in history...Mussolini worked hand in hand by applying their Fascist ideology and actions, and you call that revisionism? You are right though in calling all leftist fascists both racists and assholes.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Hitler and the #1 Fascist in history...Mussolini worked hand in hand by applying their Fascist ideology and actions, and you call that revisionism? You are right though in calling all leftist fascists both racists and assholes.

The internet is a medium that offers a podium to intellectual deficients / moral deplorables like Libhater.

That's why anybody who attributes significance beyond casual, low brow entertainment to social media is completely missing the point.

 

[Libhater]

The internet is a medium that offers a podium to intellectual deficients / moral deplorables like Libhater.

That's why anybody who attributes significance beyond casual, low brow entertainment to social media is completely missing the point.

Missing the point? I zeroed in on the point by explaining to the leftist nerds here, like you, that fascism and Nazis were a combined ideology
used by Hitler and by Mussolini, and that fascism, socialism and marxism are extreme leftist ideologies. Would you consider anyone supporting the killing
of the unborn via abortion to be a moral deplorable? And would you consider any American (say the biden family) as being financially compromised
by our #1 enemy (China), or his balloon embarrassment to be intellectually deficient?

 

[Melchizedek = Michael]

Missing the point? I zeroed in on the point by explaining to the leftist nerds here, like you, that fascism and Nazis were a combined ideology
used by Hitler and by Mussolini, and that fascism, socialism and marxism are extreme leftist ideologies. Would you consider anyone supporting the killing
of the unborn via abortion to be a moral deplorable? And would you consider any American (say the biden family) as being financially compromised
by our #1 enemy (China) to be intellectually deficient?

Hitler's main enemy were Communist, his biggest backers were industrialists!

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Would you consider anyone supporting the killing
of the unborn via abortion to be a moral deplorable? And would you consider any American (say the biden family) as being financially compromised
by our #1 enemy (China) to be intellectually deficient?

JPP has a cornucopia of solid candidates for poster child--representing all of America's intellectually and morally deficient.

TDAK, Bullshit Blob, Milquetoast Macaw, Earl, the poster formerly known as AssHat, yourself---the list is remarkably long.

Try to take pride in being a part of that. You haven't anything else, I'm afraid.

 

[Libhater]

JPP has a cornucopia of solid candidates for poster child--representing all of America's intellectually and morally deficient.

TDAK, Bullshit Blob, Milquetoast Macaw, Earl, the poster formerly known as AssHat, yourself---the list is remarkably long.

Try to take pride in being a part of that. You haven't anything else, I'm afraid.

No surprise to see another leftist moron like yourself resort to name calling so as to avoid debating or conversing with any sign of intellect.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No shit sherlock....you should have read carefully and comprehensively the content of my links.


Some readers wrote to us saying we should have made clear the difference between the federal deficit and the federal debt. A deficit occurs when the government takes in less money than it spends in a given year. The debt is the total amount the government owes at any given time. So the debt goes up in any given year by the amount of the deficit, or it decreases by the amount of any surplus. The debt the government owes to the public decreased for a while under Clinton, but the debt was by no means erased.


Other readers have noted a USA Today story stating that, under an alternative type of accounting, the final four years of the Clinton administration taken together would have shown a deficit. This is based on an annual document called the “Financial Report of the U.S. Government,” which reports what the governments books would look like if kept on an accrual basis like those of most corporations, rather than the cash basis that the government has always used. The principal difference is that under accrual accounting the government would book immediately the costs of promises made to pay future benefits to government workers and Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries. But even under accrual accounting, the annual reports showed surpluses of $69.2 billion in fiscal 1998, $76.9 billion in fiscal 1999, and $46 billion for fiscal year 2000. So even if the government had been using that form of accounting the deficit would have been erased for those three years.


You can wiggle, you can dance, but all that MAGA BS will still end up in your pants.

Republicans are red, Democrats are blue, you're still an idiot, too bad for you.

The budget deficit or surplus is different from the national DEBT. Stinky Gekko has confused the two repeatedly. As I've stated several times now, Clinton and the Republican Congress were able to balance the budget and get a surplus for a year or two. They didn't eliminate the national debt.

Only a complete MAGA mook tries to mock someone and end up coming off like a grade school petulant child having a tantrum.

As the reader can clearly see, TD is not too bright. He repeats his myopic viewpoint while ignoring the fact based explanation that explains why his hyperbole is in error. What's more, the revisionist clap trap of giving the Clinton era GOP equal credit for balancing the budget is a joke, given the documented history of historic stone walling the GOP did during his 8 years. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/12/6833...history-no-longer-how-1995-changed-everything

Now, continue being an insipidly stubborn MAGA troll, TD.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Racist, fascist assholes are heavy into revisionism.....they love to redefine words, phrases and terminology to suit their needs. So what the Nazi's and Mussolini say, given the historical record, are nothing but a piss in the wind.

Interesting how you seem to parrot their mindset....inadvertently proving the thread subject title and OP.

Hitler and the #1 Fascist in history...Mussolini worked hand in hand by applying their Fascist ideology and actions, and you call that revisionism? You are right though in calling all leftist fascists both racists and assholes.

It never ceases to amaze me how incredibly dimwitted you MAGA mooks are....I mean, the chronology of the posts clearly shows what you stated and my subsequent response ... yet here you are trying to pretend something wholly different transpired.

But if you are truly this stupid, let me dumb it down for you: Nazi's and fascists are NOT true socialist no matter how long and loud they claim to be. Matters of fact, matters of history.




Only the sad fool you see in the mirror and your like minded brethren are buying your bilge, toodles. Carry on.

 

[IBDaMann]

Nazis were Fascist,right wing ,

You might be the most gullible moron on the planet if you allowed yourself to be duped into believing that the National Socialist Workers Party was somehow right wing.

Too funny.

their biggest enemy in Germany that they fought on the streets were Communist, don't get more left than Communism

Yes, Communists and Socialists are dire enemies and both are firmly planted on the far left.

 

[Libhater]

You might be the most gullible moron on the planet if you allowed yourself to be duped into believing that the National Socialist Workers Party was somehow right wing.

Too funny.


Yes, Communists and Socialists are dire enemies and both are firmly planted on the far left.

You totally nailed it, yet these leftists will never admit that they are aligned with the Marxist, Socialist, Fascist and Communist ideologies.
One thing they keep overlooking or screwing up on is when they call anyone on the right, or anyone that believes in capitalism some kind of
a Nazi, or a fascist etc. Couldn't be more wrong with their simple minded assertions, since we capitalists/conservatives are the complete
opposite of their ridiculous assertion that right wingers are any of those anti American leftist destructive ideals.

 

[Mason Michaels]

You might be the most gullible moron on the planet if you allowed yourself to be duped into believing that the National Socialist Workers Party was somehow right wing.

Too funny.


Yes, Communists and Socialists are dire enemies and both are firmly planted on the far left.

Nazi claiming Nazis aren't Nazis.

 

[Mason Michaels]

You might be the most gullible moron on the planet if you allowed yourself to be duped into believing that the National Socialist Workers Party was somehow right wing.

Too funny.


Yes, Communists and Socialists are dire enemies and both are firmly planted on the far left.

You're a moron!

 

[IBDaMann]

You're a moron!

... and you're totally brilliant ... and an eloquent writer ... and a valuable person.