Masks don't prevent transmission of Viruses

Dutch Uncle said:
<insert picture of Evmetro masturbating on the page here>

Your belief "TOW hasn't disputed the pseudoscience link means she endorses" it is all the proof anyone needs to know your thinker is broken.

Here's more gems from your website "Signs of the Times": 9/11 conspiracies and UFOs. Is there any doubt that you, Evmetro, believe these things because you can't dispute them?

https://www.sott.net/article/124840-9-11-Conspiracy-Doodles
Of course, there is no particular reason why we should think that Kennedy's subconscious threw up to him, 40 years in advance, the date of the plot by a section of the American and Israeli governments to attack the American people and blame it on a bunch of Arabs; but we can't rule it out.

https://www.sott.net/article/124496...t-Serpo-Psy-ops-and-the-Pentagons-Flying-Fish
I still put our researchers on it because I WAS curious. And as the info kept coming in, it looked more and more like the Pentagon was, indeed, the "smoking gun" of 911 - even moreso than the collapse of WTC building 7.

I wrote my article "Comments on the Pentagon Strike" based on what info we had collected and as time went by and more data came in, we have added to it.

The Pentagon Flash Video was based, in part, on this article. What really shocked us was the way the video "took off" on its own. I'm not exaggerating when I tell you that it has been viewed by at LEAST 500 million people. Yeah, half a BILLION (and that was six months ago when we assembled the data for a count). It took down about five dedicated servers that were hosting it. It also triggered some VERY interesting reactions. But what I want to point out here is that the extraordinary popularity of this video says one thing: people know subconsciously that it is TRUE, that there was no Flight 77 at the Pentagon. Now notice carefully that I do not say that there was no PLANE, because there certainly was. It was just not Flight 77 nor anything like a Boeing 757.


https://www.sott.net/article/184769-Massive-UFO-event-in-Uzbekistan-widely-reported
A massive UFO event has occurred in the capital of Uzbekistan, Tashkent. Numerous residents claim to have seen a UFO on May 15 at around 6pm. The UFO was seen for around half an hour before disappearing. Witnesses included foreign Journalists and Directors of local corporations. The incident has been widely reported in both Uzbeki and Russian media outlets.


https://www.sott.net/article/216439...ns-the-truth-has-been-blocked-by-the-military
At 4:00 on October 13 Qinling event, reportedly, four in the morning today, a village in the Qinling mountain inexplicably disappeared. Now the military has cordoned off the area. According to eyewitnesses, a UFO flying around. Qinling Mountains in the snakes have fled, there are also insiders of the nuclear base in the Qinling Mountains in the accident.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that the published medical studies are invalidated due to them being cited by sort.net?:thinking:
 
Dutch Uncle said:
<insert picture of Evmetro masturbating on the page here>

Your belief "TOW hasn't disputed the pseudoscience link means she endorses" it is all the proof anyone needs to know your thinker is broken.

Here's more gems from your website "Signs of the Times": 9/11 conspiracies and UFOs. Is there any doubt that you, Evmetro, believe these things because you can't dispute them?

https://www.sott.net/article/124840-9-11-Conspiracy-Doodles
Of course, there is no particular reason why we should think that Kennedy's subconscious threw up to him, 40 years in advance, the date of the plot by a section of the American and Israeli governments to attack the American people and blame it on a bunch of Arabs; but we can't rule it out.

https://www.sott.net/article/124496...t-Serpo-Psy-ops-and-the-Pentagons-Flying-Fish
I still put our researchers on it because I WAS curious. And as the info kept coming in, it looked more and more like the Pentagon was, indeed, the "smoking gun" of 911 - even moreso than the collapse of WTC building 7.

I wrote my article "Comments on the Pentagon Strike" based on what info we had collected and as time went by and more data came in, we have added to it.

The Pentagon Flash Video was based, in part, on this article. What really shocked us was the way the video "took off" on its own. I'm not exaggerating when I tell you that it has been viewed by at LEAST 500 million people. Yeah, half a BILLION (and that was six months ago when we assembled the data for a count). It took down about five dedicated servers that were hosting it. It also triggered some VERY interesting reactions. But what I want to point out here is that the extraordinary popularity of this video says one thing: people know subconsciously that it is TRUE, that there was no Flight 77 at the Pentagon. Now notice carefully that I do not say that there was no PLANE, because there certainly was. It was just not Flight 77 nor anything like a Boeing 757.


https://www.sott.net/article/184769-Massive-UFO-event-in-Uzbekistan-widely-reported
A massive UFO event has occurred in the capital of Uzbekistan, Tashkent. Numerous residents claim to have seen a UFO on May 15 at around 6pm. The UFO was seen for around half an hour before disappearing. Witnesses included foreign Journalists and Directors of local corporations. The incident has been widely reported in both Uzbeki and Russian media outlets.


https://www.sott.net/article/216439...ns-the-truth-has-been-blocked-by-the-military
At 4:00 on October 13 Qinling event, reportedly, four in the morning today, a village in the Qinling mountain inexplicably disappeared. Now the military has cordoned off the area. According to eyewitnesses, a UFO flying around. Qinling Mountains in the snakes have fled, there are also insiders of the nuclear base in the Qinling Mountains in the accident.
Click to expand...

None of those items are the article in the opening post. I have not seen you dispute anything in the article that this thread is about. Are you able to dispute the article that this thread is about, or are you endorsing it?
 
anonymoose said:
Are you saying that the published medical studies are invalidated due to them being cited by sort.net?:thinking:
Click to expand...

No. I'm saying that the website is run by conspiracy theory kooks who take information and twist it into a pretzel.

Example. Links from the OP link:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...matic-review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
There is some evidence to support the wearing of masks or respirators during illness to protect others, and public health emphasis on mask wearing during illness may help to reduce influenza virus transmission.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
Some evidence suggests that mask use is best undertaken as partof a package of personal protection especially hand hygiene. Theeffectiveness of masks and respirators is likely linked to early,consistent and correct usage.
 
Last edited:
Evmetro said:
None of those items are the article in the opening post. I have not seen you dispute anything in the article that this thread is about. Are you able to dispute the article that this thread is about, or are you endorsing it?
Click to expand...

Others can scroll up, you are free to deny.
 
Evmetro said:
Still no lefties have disputed the content of the article in the opening post. This is a picture worth a thousand words.
Click to expand...
There is no content to dispute. It's just another wacko right-wing conspiracy theory .

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
anonymoose said:
Are you saying that the published medical studies are invalidated due to them being cited by sort.net?:thinking:
Click to expand...
Are you saying that those medical studies actually support the conclusions in that piece of crap article.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Crocodile said:
If the viral laced fluids can't make contact they can't infect, troll boy. It's grade school stuff, in all seriousness. See how easy it is to tear down your troll attempts?
Click to expand...
Says the scientifically illiterate moron.

Facemasks don't even help. Your mindless troll response is debunked in my Sig, ...as well as in the OP.

You should find out how you score on PSAT before you try to venture into an adult conversation.
 
rjhenn said:
Are you saying that those medical studies actually support the conclusions in that piece of crap article.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I've always acknowledged that masks are very effective If you have a propensity to cough or sneeze in people faces.
 
rjhenn said:
Are you saying that those medical studies actually support the conclusions in that piece of crap article.
Click to expand...
If you weren't mathematically incompetent you could have figured out that the BFE95 rating on standard face masks doesn't work on viruses of 120 nanometers. Yes, some viruses are stuck in fluid and some of those are blocked. The vast bulk remain unhindered.
 
IBDaMann said:
If you weren't mathematically incompetent you could have figured out that the BFE95 rating on standard face masks doesn't work on viruses of 120 nanometers. Yes, some viruses are stuck in fluid and some of those are blocked. The vast bulk remain unhindered.
Click to expand...

Stop it. The virus travels on droplets that are stopped. That is why masks work. You really cannot understand that?
 
Nordberg said:
Stop it. The virus travels on droplets that are stopped. That is why masks work. You really cannot understand that?
Click to expand...
Are you referencing that law of physics that viruses don't a metro ticket out of the body unless they are in a droplet?

Do you really believe that viruses have to show their droplet at the gate or else they aren't allowed to pass? There is nothing preventing a virus from not being in a droplet and MANY are not. COVID-19 floats in the air and goes right through BFE95 msks.
 
IBDaWoMann said:
Says the scientifically illiterate moron.

Facemasks don't even help. Your mindless troll response is debunked in my Sig, ...as well as in the OP.

You should find out how you score on PSAT before you try to venture into an adult conversation.
Click to expand...
So you're a teen, posting from your basement. Come back when you've taken the real SAT. And the NMSQT.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
IBDaWoMann said:
If you weren't mathematically incompetent you could have figured out that the BFE95 rating on standard face masks doesn't work on viruses of 120 nanometers. Yes, some viruses are stuck in fluid and some of those are blocked. The vast bulk remain unhindered.
Click to expand...
Come back when you learn how to read.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
IBDaMann said:
Are you referencing that law of physics that viruses don't a metro ticket out of the body unless they are in a droplet?

Do you really believe that viruses have to show their droplet at the gate or else they aren't allowed to pass? There is nothing preventing a virus from not being in a droplet and MANY are not. COVID-19 floats in the air and goes right through BFE95 msks.
Click to expand...

Lol, these lefties dont want to know what happens to the droplet nuclei when the droplets evaporate. Have you noticed how no lefty here disputes anything in the article that the thread is about?
 
Evmetro said:
Lol, these lefties dont want to know what happens to the droplet nuclei when the droplets evaporate. Have you noticed how no lefty here disputes anything in the article that the thread is about?
Click to expand...
If you posted it, we know that it's a pack of lies. QED.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Evmetro said:
Lol, these lefties dont want to know what happens to the droplet nuclei when the droplets evaporate. Have you noticed how no lefty here disputes anything in the article that the thread is about?
Click to expand...

How can they?

attachment.php

attachment.php
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top