Masks don't prevent transmission of Viruses

Then why do you not dispute ANYTHING from the article that the thread is about?

Congrats! Evmetro wins the thread! Doctors and nurses all over the world can now throw away their surgical masks. Kudos, dude!

4dnwns.jpg
 
Congrats! Evmetro wins the thread! Doctors and nurses all over the world can now throw away their surgical masks. Kudos, dude!

It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.
 
I don't know if wearing a mask helps or not, although in most cases I comply if asked. I would also assume some masks are better than others.
I do know my glasses fog up indoors quite a bit while wearing a mask. Has the breath that fogged up my glasses been filtered?
 
I don't know if wearing a mask helps or not, although in most cases I comply if asked. I would also assume some masks are better than others.
I do know my glasses fog up indoors quite a bit while wearing a mask. Has the breath that fogged up my glasses been filtered?

The fog is likely where your breathe went between the mask and the outside of your nose. Masks dont seal very well. It may not matter though, and there is an article in the opening post that may shed some light on this. Apparently it is a very good article, since no lefties here have disputed it.
 
The fog is likely where your breathe went between the mask and the outside of your nose. Masks dont seal very well. It may not matter though, and there is an article in the opening post that may shed some light on this. Apparently it is a very good article, since no lefties here have disputed it.

You can usually feel it breaking the seal around the bridge of your nose when it escapes, unless you're wearing a cloth mask (which they say is all but useless?).
In any event, I think they (some) help a little, but aren't a "stop all." As I said, I comply in most cases.
 
You can usually feel it breaking the seal around the bridge of your nose when it escapes, unless you're wearing a cloth mask (which they say is all but useless?).
In any event, I think they (some) help a little, but aren't a "stop all." As I said, I comply in most cases.
Outside of medical care cases (doctor's office, dentist's office, etc.) and work (would lose my job if I don't at least wear it below my nose), I do not comply with the mask tyranny, even though there is a Statewide mandate. I regularly walk into grocery stores without one, and other small shops and even a restaurant last weekend without one.

My 'Cult of the Mask' sig explains in more detail what this mask tyranny is really all about (and it starts with willful compliance).
 
Outside of medical care cases (doctor's office, dentist's office, etc.) and work (would lose my job if I don't at least wear it below my nose), I do not comply with the mask tyranny, even though there is a Statewide mandate. I regularly walk into grocery stores without one, and other small shops and even a restaurant last weekend without one.

My 'Cult of the Mask' sig explains in more detail what this mask tyranny is really all about (and it starts with willful compliance).

I comply in stores and any business that posts a requirement. I have no interest in arguing with a store employee trying to keep their job and the business from getting shut down. Outside? No mask.
 
It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.
Mantra 3.

You must be very, very pleased with yourself. Congrats!

4dnwns.jpg
 
Mantra 3.

You must be very, very pleased with yourself. Congrats!

It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.

I see you still do not dispute any part of the article. I'm getting tired of winning.
 
It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.

I see you still do not dispute any part of the article. I'm getting tired of winning.
No doubt you are very tired.
 
It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.

I see you still do not dispute any part of the article. I'm getting tired of winning.

Trump tried to warn you that you would... ;) ;)
 
The one you wrote and maintain on your free forum? The one with "Me, Myself and Irene"? This one? https://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/59/nights-numbered-mantra-list

Yes.
I didn't write the list. ITN wrote (and maintains) the list.

It is not ITN's free forum. It is IBD's free forum.

The Cult of the Mask page on it is mostly my content (with some exceptions), and I (for the most part) am the one who maintains that almanac.


We are three different people dude... Get used to it.
 
I didn't write the list. ITN wrote (and maintains) the list.

It is not ITN's free forum. It is IBD's free forum.

The Cult of the Mask page on it is mostly my content (with some exceptions), and I (for the most part) am the one who maintains that almanac.


We are three different people dude... Get used to it.

So just how "close" are you three?...or is it four?

I've asked you before and I'll ask you again: Will you take the sock pledge as I've done to allow any mod to reveal to the forum if either of us has any sock puppets now, in the past or in the future?

You've refused before. Why? If you want people to believe you are not all socks, that is the easiest way to clear it up.
 
So you want us to believe that there is something trump could do that you scrotum lickers would approve of?? Not only are you a fucking moron but you're a delusional asshole If you think anyone believes that.

He could resign. Is there anything that Trump could do that you butt lickers wouldn't approve of?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You are reading impaired. I have read the article and presented you with peer reviewed evidence contradicting them. Have you read the abstracts? I did.

I will also repeat the charge that the articles you sighted are criticized for having to small a sample size to be statistically significant and don’t address the fact that they ignore the issue of viral adherence which I have challenged you on and you ignore but you are pretty good at making illogical circular arguments and political ad homs.

What is clear to me is you are guilty of confirmation bias by not evaluating evidence for in favor of the evidence against. Which means you don’t have clue what you’re talking about and don’t understand how scientific research works.

Well, you are talking to ev after all. The very definition of confirmation bias and not understanding anything that conflicts with what he wants to believe.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top