Political identify terms have become obsolete. Socialists, democrats, libertarians, GOP, communists, progressives, lefties, and commies are all the same thing, and I just refer to all of them as either lefties or commies. PoliTalker is a lowly commie who has lived a life of failure. He has never succeeded at anything, so now he wants to take everybody else's success.
So you went from a janitor running a business . Pretty dishonest. The fact is if you are not training people to do the top positions ,you are doing a terrible job. You should have redundancy in every position. If you are a godly manager keeping all the biuusioness to yourself, you cannot go on vacation or get sick without hurting the company.
If you are working at a big corporation and keep your staff from understanding your duties, you cannnot get promoted. There is nobody who can do your job. You are creating a blockage to your moving up.
Yeah, workers can do the big jobs. You insult them .
JK Galbraith called top bosses ratifiers. They have a staff that does all the work gathering data on how something is working. They do the same for new projects, Once they have all the data clollected, they give it to the boss. The data is the decider. He simply gives a go ahead to what was proven by the workers.
...PoliTalker is not a commie and how would you know if he has lived a life of failure...
Politalker is a commie and a failure. If he owned his own successful business, he would not be plotting how to take successful businesses from successful people. He does not recognize the type of character required to start AND maintain a successful business.
Politalker is a commie and a failure. If he owned his own successful business, he would not be plotting how to take successful businesses from successful people. He does not recognize the type of character required to start AND maintain a successful business.
Plotting how to take successful businesses from successful people? PLOTTING???
Have you always been this paranoid?
I don't think you have to worry about what Politaker is "plotting". He's harmless.
To sane people, that is.
Read the title
I did.
Maybe Companies Should Not Be Bought Or Sold But Given To The Workers Who Built Them
The notion that a company or ANY asset should be "given" away is pure commie wet dream. PoliTalker can't build his own successful business, so he wants to be "given" somebody else's. What he doesn't understand however, is that he won't be able to keep the flame of success lit after his big government steps in on his behalf to redistribute somebody else's business to him. If he was not a failure, he would just start his own successful company. If he really cared about seeing workers given successful companies to run without a capitalist leader, he would just go around opening a bunch of companies to give away. This won't happen though, since he is a failure and a commie. His only hope is to be given somebody else's succes.
The notion that the workers built the companies is flawed as well.
I don't agree with PoliTaker's comments. He's a little misguided and tends to think in idealistic terms rather than practical ones. What he fails to understand is that company owners got the capital, worked extremely hard and took the risks associated with starting and building a successful company. Without them, the workers he talks about would have no company to work for. Also, he seems to think that the workers would have the business acumen to run the business successfully. That's the major flaw in his argument, of which there are many. PoliTaker continues to criticize successful business owners, calling them "greedy", "immoral" and "Wealthaholics". His disdain and resentment towards these successful entrepreneurs is puzzling and misguided. He tends to make unsubstantiated and unfounded claims about the "super-rich" (as he calls them) so he can justify his hate towards them. This makes his argument fall flat on its face.
But it doesn't mean he's not successful or can't run his own business. That's where you're wrong. If you want to debate in a mature, rational manner, criticize what he says and why it won't work rather than launching your silly, immature ad hominem attacks.