Mental Illness is not to blame for gun violence
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
In August of 2017.
One of those sides was full of Nazis. Guess which one. It was the one that screamed "Jews will not replace us" while marching with Tiki torches.
You are the primary supplier of guns to criminals.
Just FYI - most criminals get stolen weapons.
20,000 weapons are stolen every year and no one knows where they are.
After 10 years, that's 200,000 guns that are just...out there...somewhere...in the hands of who-fucking-knows?
The biggest supplier of guns to criminals are "responsible gun owners" such as yourself.
Yes, and obviously he had no previous felonies or mental health issues thus passing the INSTANT BACKGROUND CHECK. . Try to be less of a mentally unsound dumbass.
Then why do you moronically believe that MORE laws will stop them? I wish you weren't mentally ill. Really I do.
Another mentally retarded lie. When has anyone stolen one of my guns to commit a crime you unstable dimwitted wonder dunce?
So if criminals are STEALING their guns, how are more laws going to stop them? You define stupid.
Why don't you just admit that you don't care if criminals get guns. You want the Government to confiscate all 393 million guns owned in the US in the moronic, mentally retarded belief that this will make you safer.
Yeah, you should know by now that I don't take anything you people say about yourselves as the truth, so just fucking stop because that habit of yours is really boring.
Another dishonest mentally challenged leftist loon who thinks criminals follow our laws.
Well, for one, a mental health evaluation would probably catch someone so fucking reckless, lazy, and stupid that they make it easy for a criminal to steal their gun.
After all, you gotta be a real fucking nutcase not to safely and securely store your weapons, RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRIGHT???
Once again, I don't think a mentally deranged, pathological lying dumbass like you can post without lying and looking like a moron.
Stricter parameters around who can have a gun that could be stolen, obviously.
You're the one arming them.
So if you can't arm them anymore, then they won't have guns, will they?
^Another perfect example as to why one cannot argue with a triggered mentally ill lunatic.
All anyone would need to do to get you committed is to show a judge your posts on JPP.
But that's not what I asked.
I asked how does that 0.5 difference look within the context of all 50 states + DC?
There you go with the mentally unstable, dumb lies again. I don't think you can post without looking dishonest, delusional, stupid and lying.
Now you are exagerating lunacy like the triggered mental case we know you to be. Why not just admit your a dishonest, stupid hack who wants the Government to confiscate 393 million guns in the moronic, ignorant belief that it will make you safe?
So thanks for showing these images because they continue to service my argument that mental health screenings and evaluations would significantly reduce guyn deaths.
Most certainly around suicides!
About 17,000 people attempt suicide by gun each year, and 15,000 of those people (85%) are successful.
Now, we know that far more people attempt suicide by drug overdose than suicide by gun, and even despite that uneven comparison, only 3% of people who attempt suicide by drug overdose are successful.
So if you took guns away from those 17,000 people who tried to kill themselves, leaving them with all the other options, chances are most of those people will try to kill themselves with drugs.
So...since only 3% of drug overdose attempts are successful, we merely apply that 3% to the 17,000 who would have killed themselves with guns, and come to find out that only 750 people would have died instead of 15,000.
But we would never have been able to make that figure go down by 95% without mandatory pre-screenings.