Into the Night
Verified User
People shoot people with guns. if they do not have guns, they will not shoot people.
You cannot take guns away. People are free to use whatever weapon they choose.
People shoot people with guns. if they do not have guns, they will not shoot people.
You cannot take guns away. People are free to use whatever weapon they choose.
False equivalence fallacy. The Japanese are very group oriented. It is not because of a lack of guns they don't kill each other so much. It is because it is a society made up of a single unified people. Stealing a bike is enough to get you ostracized from society in Japan.Because it did just that in Japan.
A gun does not mean a person is a criminal. There are literally hundreds of people around you right not that own and carry guns. They aren't shooting you or anyone else with them. Self defense is an inherent right. That includes defense using the weapon of your choice.Not only that, but most guns that criminals have they are not using at any given moment.
Want to start a war?If you ban all guns, you can arrest anyone who is caught with a gun.
Banning any gun is a step too far. Nothing in the Constitution specifies that any gun may be banned because of it's action, it's ammunition type, it's brand, or the way it looks. You simply fail to recognize the Constitution of the United States or of any State. That's obvious.I think banning all guns might be a step too far,
WRONG. You are making false equivalencies again. That's a fallacy, dude. You are also being a bigot. Your hoplophobia does not justify that. BTW. Switzerland requires each household to own a gun.but some gun control, like Australia, Canada, or Switzerland, would greatly reduce the number of deaths.
No. False equivalence fallacy.And draconian gun control, like in Japan, would really reduce them...
You don't get to define 'reasonable things'.But we also hurt hunting and other reasonable things.
All of them have guns. NO GOVERNMENT CAN STOP ANYONE FROM CARRYING ANY GUN OF THEIR CHOICE.Lets just be like Australia, Canada, or Switzerland.
Of course, you can. It will not likely happen in America but the act of raking guns is possible.
Try it. You just try to 'collect Trump supporters'. See how far you get.
People shoot people with guns. if they do not have guns, they will not shoot people.
The birdbrain Milquetoast Macaw thinks he's in a position of power.
Pathetic.
you're a moron.
You're a moron, AssHat.
Nordberg said, "People shoot people with guns. If they do not have guns, they will not shoot people"
This is absolutely true, and thus irrefutable (unless we consider archery "shooting").
It is not necessarily a good argument for circumventing the second amendment, but you weren't quick enough to respond in those term.
Instead, you projected your own moron status on Nordberg, the O.J Simpson character in Naked Gun.
No criminal has ever gotten a gun from me
Guns don't shoot people. People shoot people.
Yeah right.
You're very reckless and irresponsible, so there's no reason to believe that you take securing your guns seriously.
Then why do you want to give PEOPLE access to guns?
Apparently no one has, so that shows his guns are secure.
RQAA
Once again the racist left ignores the pandemic of illegal guns killing young black men at an alarming rate. Only when they can whine about a white guy do they pretend to care about gun violence.
Why do ebonic names like yours go hand in hand with stupid comments, Dolla?
Obama never said stupid things like that.
Call yourself Oliver or something and straighten out.
That goes for whether or not that white hand is yours.
Eminem doesn't have a Princeton diploma either.
Nobody on either side is justifying gun violence against by anybody against anybody. Nobody.
How could that even be hinted at by my post?
I merely pointed out that gun ownership is built into our nation, and we can't change it.