Misogyny, abortion and the 'swing states '

moon

moon

Satire for Sanity
' The road to the White House this year runs through seven swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.'

Abortion laws are likely to be highly influential across the swing states and the - private- female vote will favor the Womens' Rights position of Kamala .

Arizona and Georgia legislators support the primitive doctrine of No Abortions.
North Carolina and Wisconsin have weak abortion laws from the Womens' Rights viewpoint but neither are anti-abortion.
Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania are pro-abortion states.

Do the women in these seven states want to deny males the power to dictate ownership of females' bodies ?

If so, then Kamala is home and dry.
I don't believe that any other issue could be so important to 50% of the population of these states .
 
moon said:
Abortion laws are likely to be highly influential across the swing states and the - private- female vote will favor the Womens' Rights position of Kamala .
Click to expand...

I strongly agree with your assessment that the female vote will favor positions that advocate for a woman's right to self-determination on reproductive rights...Kamala's position.

I personally think that it is WAY PAST TIME for men to step up more forcefully to defend those rights also. The notion that legislators, mostly male, take it upon themselves to deny these rights to women is a notion that should go the way of the dinosaur. Immediately!

I hope Kamala Harris raises that issue in every campaign speech...at every stop during this campaign. The idea that Trump and his ilk see things the other way must be fought by everyone...male and female. It is not a female problem...it is a human problem.
 
she hasn't got anything else to run on besides abortion.......she obviously doesn't dare to talk about the economy, the border or foreign policy......good lord, in foreign policy she hasn't advanced beyond "Russia is a bigger country than Ukraine".......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
she hasn't got anything else to run on besides abortion.......she obviously doesn't dare to talk about the economy, the border or foreign policy......good lord, in foreign policy she hasn't advanced beyond "Russia is a bigger country than Ukraine".......
Click to expand...
Smart Republicans would immediately realize that they could lose the election on this issue and change tack on abortion.
Clearly- you aren't one.
 
moon said:
Smart Republicans would immediately realize that they could lose the election on this issue and change tack on abortion.
Clearly- you aren't one.
Click to expand...
/shrugs.........killing your children to win an election isn't what I would consider smart.....
 
Ross Dolan said:
I strongly agree with your assessment that the female vote will favor positions that advocate for a woman's right to self-determination on reproductive rights...Kamala's position.

I personally think that it is WAY PAST TIME for men to step up more forcefully to defend those rights also. The notion that legislators, mostly male, take it upon themselves to deny these rights to women is a notion that should go the way of the dinosaur. Immediately!

I hope Kamala Harris raises that issue in every campaign speech...at every stop during this campaign. The idea that Trump and his ilk see things the other way must be fought by everyone...male and female. It is not a female problem...it is a human problem.
Click to expand...
why should men step up to forcefully defend womens rights when those women refuse to support mens rights?
 
moon said:
Do the women in these seven states want to deny males the power to dictate ownership of females' bodies ?
Click to expand...
Idk... they seemed to be perfectly fine with their bodies being owned regarding COVID, in which they were forced to wear masks and receive jabs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
moon said:
' The road to the White House this year runs through seven swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.'

Abortion laws are likely to be highly influential across the swing states and the - private- female vote will favor the Womens' Rights position of Kamala .

Arizona and Georgia legislators support the primitive doctrine of No Abortions.
North Carolina and Wisconsin have weak abortion laws from the Womens' Rights viewpoint but neither are anti-abortion.
Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania are pro-abortion states.

Do the women in these seven states want to deny males the power to dictate ownership of females' bodies ?

If so, then Kamala is home and dry.
I don't believe that any other issue could be so important to 50% of the population of these states .
Click to expand...
She hasn't got anything other than abortion... which really isn't a problem for anyone if you take precautions to avoid an unwanted pregnancy...there's a brand new otc bc pill in addition to dozens of Other kinds of easily available birth control...
 
gfm7175 said:
Idk... they seemed to be perfectly fine with their bodies being owned regarding COVID, in which they were forced to wear masks and receive jabs.
Click to expand...
For your analogy to even score three out of ten men must be capable of having babies.
SmarterthanYou said:
you mean the only smart republican is the one who doesn't defend the rights of men.

fixed that for you
Click to expand...
You mean that you've ' fixed it' for YOU . Men have no rights over womens' bodies. Those that want children should mate with a woman that does too.
 
moon said:
For your analogy to even score three out of ten men must be capable of having babies.
Click to expand...
Liberals claim that's possible.
moon said:
Men have no rights over womens' bodies.
Click to expand...
I agree. Liberal men shouldn't have been forcing women to wear masks and receive jabs. Your anger about this issue is misdirected.
moon said:
Those that want children should mate with a woman that does too.
Click to expand...
IOW, get married and then procreate. The Biblical way. :)
 
gfm7175 said:
Liberals claim that's possible.

I agree. Liberal men shouldn't have been forcing women to wear masks and receive jabs. Your anger about this issue is misdirected.

IOW, get married and then procreate. The Biblical way. :)
Click to expand...
You appear to specialize in nonsense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top