shut up assholeI don't make two punctuation every four words.
shut up assholeI don't make two punctuation every four words.
That's a dumb statement. Abortion is not "killing your children"./shrugs.........killing your children to win an election isn't what I would consider smart.....
You're an idiot.Liberals claim that's possible.
I agree. Liberal men shouldn't have been forcing women to wear masks and receive jabs. Your anger about this issue is misdirected.
IOW, get married and then procreate. The Biblical way.
if women have the right to murder their unborn child if they don't want a kid yet, why shouldn't a man have the right to not pay child support for a kid they don't want?For your analogy to even score three out of ten men must be capable of having babies.
You mean that you've ' fixed it' for YOU . Men have no rights over womens' bodies. Those that want children should mate with a woman that does too.
it most certainly is 'killing your children'. saying anything differently makes you a moron of the highest caliberThat's a dumb statement. Abortion is not "killing your children".
No it isn't. It's illegal.it most certainly is 'killing your children'. saying anything differently makes you a moron of the highest caliber
It's you that looks stupid. Child maintenance is not a ' right'- it is decided on a case-by-case basis.if women have the right to murder their unborn child if they don't want a kid yet, why shouldn't a man have the right to not pay child support for a kid they don't want?
this is why you liberal idiots look so fucking hate filled and stupid.
I think that ' high caliber moron ' is an oxymoron in itself.it most certainly is 'killing your children'. saying anything differently makes you a moron of the highest caliber
your willful ignorance is on clear display. you are choosing to ignore the obvious unfairness to men in favor of women that will never want to be with you anyway, you basement dwelling simpIt's you that looks stupid. Child maintenance is not a ' right'- it is decided on a case-by-case basis.
Do you call yourself ' SmarterthanYou ' because you're a cross-dresser ?
Jesus H. Christ...are you back with your moronic posts.why should men step up to forcefully defend womens rights when those women refuse to support mens rights?
you never fail to amuse me with your idiotic attempts at trying to be smarter than me. You fail miserably, but it's still amusing.Jesus H. Christ...are you back with your moronic posts.
Hope all is well. Try to figure it out on your own. After all, you supposedly are smarter than someone.
There won't be any dry basements if you climate-denying corporate serfs are in charge.your willful ignorance is on clear display. you are choosing to ignore the obvious unfairness to men in favor of women that will never want to be with you anyway, you basement dwelling simp
If he used protection and she didn't, small chance of pregnancy. If she used protection and he didn't, small chance of pregnancy.if women have the right to murder their unborn child if they don't want a kid yet, why shouldn't a man have the right to not pay child support for a kid they don't want?
this is why you liberal idiots look so fucking hate filled and stupid.
Damn near anyone in the forum is smarter than you. But...you like the name, so go with it.you never fail to amuse me with your idiotic attempts at trying to be smarter than me. You fail miserably, but it's still amusing.
You could have it sewed- but that would be unpleasant, I guess.shut up asshole
why do you continue to ignore the one sided aspect of reproductive rights? misandry?If he used protection and she didn't, small chance of pregnancy. If she used protection and he didn't, small chance of pregnancy.
If neither used protection and a pregnancy resulted, both are responsible for it.
Yet all you can do is whine about the poor man whose sperm contributed 50% to the pregnancy.
cope harderDamn near anyone in the forum is smarter than you. But...you like the name, so go with it.
IT amuses.
Da Jews moonie, it's da JEWS' The road to the White House this year runs through seven swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.'
Abortion laws are likely to be highly influential across the swing states and the - private- female vote will favor the Womens' Rights position of Kamala .
Arizona and Georgia legislators support the primitive doctrine of No Abortions.
North Carolina and Wisconsin have weak abortion laws from the Womens' Rights viewpoint but neither are anti-abortion.
Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania are pro-abortion states.
Do the women in these seven states want to deny males the power to dictate ownership of females' bodies ?
If so, then Kamala is home and dry.
I don't believe that any other issue could be so important to 50% of the population of these states .
You really do look desperate.Da Jews moonie, it's da JEWS