nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples

[Damocles]

This is a tactic that he uses to avoid serious debate.

Sad, because he's smarter than that.

Rubbish, several people posted information about what Thermite was made of and how likely it was to find "traces" of the material because of the sheer volume of such material within the modern city.

Don't be deliberately obtuse, I simply reported the truth. This was gone over, there was no need to repeat it, except some people pretend they post in a vacuum and cannot remember even the beginning of a thread.

I let you pull me back into this, which is foolish. There will be nothing that changes your mind.

As I said, I would have very likely BEEN you if it hadn't been that I had a structural engineer friend... Well, I've gone over that just recently in this thread. I don't believe even you can pretend not to remember that.

 

[blackascoal]

Rubbish, several people posted information about what Thermite was made of and how likely it was to find "traces" of the material because of the sheer volume of such material within the modern city.

Don't be deliberately obtuse, I simply reported the truth. This was gone over, there was no need to repeat it, except some people pretend they post in a vacuum and cannot remember even the beginning of a thread.

I let you pull me back into this, which is foolish. There will be nothing that changes your mind.

As I said, I would have very likely BEEN you if it hadn't been that I had a structural engineer friend... Well, I've gone over that just recently in this thread. I don't believe even you can pretend not to remember that.

I appreciate your participation in this discussion, but I didn't pull you into anything. You thought you had a point, but as this thread demonstrates, you don't.

You bounce from one discredited theory to the next.

EVERYTHING you've said has been EASILY discredited, even by sources you claim.

For a smart guy, you often say some really stupid shit .. such as implying that there's no big deal that thermite was found "because of the sheer volume that was in the city."

Dude, that is mega-stupid.

In spite of what your structural engineer friend claims, there are no exceptions to the impossible. There is cognitive dissonance. There is ignorance. There are hundreds of engineers who can EASILY refute your friend's claims. There are the Laws of science, physics, and engineering.

There are no exceptions to impossible.

 

[Damocles]

I appreciate your participation in this discussion, but I didn't pull you into anything. You thought you had a point, but as this thread demonstrates, you don't.

You bounce from one discredited theory to the next.

EVERYTHING you've said has been EASILY discredited, even by sources you claim.

For a smart guy, you often say some really stupid shit .. such as implying that there's no big deal that thermite was found "because of the sheer volume that was in the city."

Dude, that is mega-stupid.

In spite of what your structural engineer friend claims, there are no exceptions to the impossible. There is cognitive dissonance. There is ignorance. There are hundreds of engineers who can EASILY refute your friend's claims. There are the Laws of science, physics, and engineering.

There are no exceptions to impossible.

Again, repeating that they are "discredited" doesn't make that real, people can see with their own eyes the buckling, can understand what happened even through your constant repetition.

If something was used to bring the building down, people can see that it wasn't thermite by simply looking at the unmelted steel that is obvious on the outside of the building. They can fully understand that tons of a metallic substance that melted at much lower temperatures were inside the building, because they crashed there.

All of what I said people can use even the evidence before their eyes to recognize. They don't have to look at the video I sought to simply give pictures to what I had been saying, they can watch any video of that day and see the buckling, for instance.

Saying it is "stupid" isn't a reasonable facsimile of an argument, nor does it make you appear to be intelligently discussing an issue that you get emotive over.

 

[tinfoil]

http://gravitydidntdoit.nfshost.com/wtc7.html


If something was used to bring the building down, people can see that it wasn't thermite by simply looking at the unmelted steel that is obvious on the outside of the building


How about beams that are cut that could not have been cut by debris clearing crews?

 

[Damocles]

http://gravitydidntdoit.nfshost.com/wtc7.html


If something was used to bring the building down, people can see that it wasn't thermite by simply looking at the unmelted steel that is obvious on the outside of the building


How about beams that are cut that could not have been cut by debris clearing crews?

That was debunked earlier in the thread by photos and links from SF. Repeating the same thing over and over... It's useless. Especially with somebody who simply rejects the idea of reading what happened.

 

[tinfoil]

that one is clearly cut with a torch

this one is not.

but ignore it!!

 

[Damocles]

that one is clearly cut with a torch

this one is not.

but ignore it!!

I don't have to ignore it, you can go back in the thread rather than ignore it yourself. BTW, that one was done by workers clearing the debris. It was shown in the pictures that SF posted. Firefighters remained on the scene throughout the clearing, in order to claim remains of their fallen brethren. There was a big stink when the new Mayor tried to save a few bucks by calling them back, a contingent of 100 remained as he capitulated...

Again BTW - SF's links and pictures debunked that very photo. Amazing.

 

[tinfoil]

Again BTW - SF's links and pictures debunked that very photo. Amazing.

LOL I said then one above was cut by workers. Now you're just ignoring other evidnece and assuming it's been debunked. please provide the link that debunks that particluar photo.

By the way, here's a video of a thermite cutting device

 

[Damocles]

Again BTW - SF's links and pictures debunked that very photo. Amazing.

LOL I said then one above was cut by workers. Now you're just ignoring other evidnece and assuming it's been debunked. please provide the link that debunks that particluar photo.

By the way, here's a video of a thermite cutting device
YouTube - Linear Thermite Cutting Charges

Again, it was debunked earlier in the thread, they went through it quite extensively. Please, read the thread before you start "LOL'ing" as you just look like a fool. Your, "Please repeat everything that went before because I'm too lazy to read." is also not convincing as a debating technique. All we ask you to do is read the thread before you start repeating everything that has already been covered. It will be helpful and you can bring up your points by quoting those posts you disagree with.

 

[tinfoil]

Again, it was debunked earlier in the thread, they went through it quite extensively. Please, read the thread before you start "LOL'ing" as you just look like a fool. Your, "Please repeat everything that went before because I'm too lazy to read." is also not convincing as a debating technique.

I just went over the link buddy! provide the debunking or you're proven to be making assumptions

 

[Damocles]

I just went over the link buddy! provide the debunking or you're proven to be making assumptions

There was more than just that link, buddy. Please read the fricking thread. Take some time. Read it. Quote the posts you think didn't clearly explain things to you, let those people talk to you about it. It's called a conversation.

Your "argument" is that I won't read the thread for you.

 

[tinfoil]

let's be clear
I'm talking about this!

 

[blackascoal]

Again, repeating that they are "discredited" doesn't make that real, people can see with their own eyes the buckling, can understand what happened even through your constant repetition.

If something was used to bring the building down, people can see that it wasn't thermite by simply looking at the unmelted steel that is obvious on the outside of the building. They can fully understand that tons of a metallic substance that melted at much lower temperatures were inside the building, because they crashed there.

All of what I said people can use even the evidence before their eyes to recognize. They don't have to look at the video I sought to simply give pictures to what I had been saying, they can watch any video of that day and see the buckling, for instance.

Saying it is "stupid" isn't a reasonable facsimile of an argument, nor does it make you appear to be intelligently discussing an issue that you get emotive over.

Naw, like your pancake theory, it's STUPID to the nth degree.

You keep repeating it doesn't make it any less STUPID .. just makes you look STUPID.

Thermite was present in the samples "because of the volume in the city" is MORONIC. You sound like a complete fool.

You keep coming back with increasingly MORONIC thought.

It doesn't matter what you believe sir, you and other fairy-tale believers have proven in this thread that you don't know what the hell you're talking about .. which is all I was trying to demonstrate.

Thanks for participatiing.

 

[Topspin]

the moon hoax guy is more believable than the 911 conspiracy tards.

 

[blackascoal]

"the moon hoax guy"

:lmao:

More "intelligence" and "evidence" from fariy-tale believers .. who don't pop in with anything remotely conscrued to be factual.

thanks for participating .. you helped prove the point.

 

[Damocles]

Naw, like your pancake theory, it's STUPID to the nth degree.

You keep repeating it doesn't make it any less STUPID .. just makes you look STUPID.

Thermite was present in the samples "because of the volume in the city" is MORONIC. You sound like a complete fool.

You keep coming back with increasingly MORONIC thought.

It doesn't matter what you believe sir, you and other fairy-tale believers have proven in this thread that you don't know what the hell you're talking about .. which is all I was trying to demonstrate.

Thanks for participatiing.

Again, you are just repeating,

"You are stupid because I say so."

Which simply isn't true, and you know it isn't. You are better than this weak Ad Hom "argument". You get emotional.

People can see with their own eyes the buckling in the structural steel regardless of how many times you repeat that. They can see that the steel hadn't "melted" and read the reports that never suggested it had. They can understand that tons of a metal (the airplanes) that definitely would melt in that heat can cause the molten metal you talk about. All of these things are very real and people can see them with their own eyes.

 

[uscitizen]

SO if Orkin had been called the thermmites would not have eaten up the WTC buildings?

 

[Damocles]

the moon hoax guy is more believable than the 911 conspiracy tards.

Sometimes it feels that way, but in reality they are just people doing the best they can to understand a very bad tragedy.

Look, as I said before. Had I not had somebody there (long before reports came out, crap the stuff was still playing 24/7) showing me these things I likely would be right there with BAC, I was wondering stuff exactly like he was and would have found the same resources he did... I can't say they are like the moon hoax people, those people are quite "loony"

 

[blackascoal]

Again, you are just repeating,

"You are stupid because I say so."

Which simply isn't true, and you know it isn't. You are better than this weak Ad Hom "argument".

People can see with their own eyes the buckling in the structural steel regardless of how many times you repeat that.

You talking stupid doesn't have shit to do with me .. nor does your rejection of your own image in the mirror.

You keep talking about what people see .. but that ain't people, that's just you brother.

PEOPLE saw giant buildings falling at free-fall speed in a manner that defies the basic tenets of science and physics .. which has never happened before or since 9/11 .. which you believe should be ignored because we're Americans.

PEOPLE saw a supposedly similar attack on a much smaller building, the Pentagon, using the same type planes with approxiamately the same amount of fuel do relatively little damage to the building where the roof didn't collapse until half an hour after the impact, leaving only a 16 by 14 ft hole, where the "intensity" of the impact couldn't burn the pages of a paper book, where you could have played 9 rounds of golf on the lawn immediately after the crash and not have to worry about stepping over bodies, luggage, engines, or bascially anything one would expect from a crash .. in fact, not even the plane which magically disappeared.

Sure, that's believeable .. and that ain't the half of it.

 

[Damocles]

You talking stupid doesn't have shit to do with me .. nor does your rejection of your own image in the mirror.

You keep talking about what people see .. but that ain't people, that's just you brother.

PEOPLE saw giant buildings falling at free-fall speed in a manner that defies the basic tenets of science and physics .. which has never happened before or since 9/11 .. which you believe should be ignored because we're Americans.

PEOPLE saw a supposedly similar attack on a much smaller building, the Pentagon, using the same type planes with approxiamately the same amount of fuel do relatively little damage to the building where the roof didn't collapse until half an hour after the impact, leaving only a 16 by 14 ft hole, where the "intensity" of the impact couldn't burn the pages of a paper book, where you could have played 9 rounds of golf on the lawn immediately after the crash and not have to worry about stepping over bodies, luggage, engines, or bascically anything one would expect from a crash .. in fact, not even the plane which magically disappeared.

People can see just by watching the video, people can understand by the explanation, and people can think even if you continue to say "You're a dummy!" And BTW, the plane didn't "magically disappear". In fact it's debris was strewn throughout the buildings. People can even see and understand that clearly with information I provided, let alone the information provided from other sources throughout the thread.