NASA: direct proof of man caused GW

Nomad said:
He had a bad heart, idiot.

Any dose of fentanyl could have killed him.

Plus, he had methamphetamine in his system too.

Double whammy.

Ergo, that does not equal overdose.... "pal".

And the homicide has not been proven.

It is merely the opinion of the medical examiner.

The ME is an appointed position and as such, subject to political pressure.

I can easily see a scenario in which the higher powers in the county applied their influence on the ME to call it a homicide just to avoid the public appearance of sweeping it under the rug, in an attempt to avoid even worse civil unrest.

I offered you the chance to just agree to disagree, but I guess you are such an insecure little person you cannot stand being disagreed with, so you've decided to needlessly drag out this little pissing match.

Bottom line: IDGAF what your opinion is and you're not going to change mine, so why don't you at least attempt to give the false impression that you've got enough class to go on your way and accept the fact that you cannot control how others see the world.
Click to expand...

One more time. The M.E. and the second autopsy BOTH ruled homicide. It’s not a criminal charge, so it’s not a matter of proof or not. It’s their conclusion.

“Could have” is nothing but concocted make believe. And your make believe scenario is nothing more than that.

I don’t give a fuck whether you disagree with me or not. I’m merely giving you the facts as presented in the two autopsies and by the two individuals who conducted them. You can contact them to bitch about their findings. I’m sure they’ll give your expert opinion all the consideration it deserves.

One more time, pally boy, the conclusion of homicide is not MY opinion. What part of that is so difficult for you to grasp?
 
domer76 said:
One more time. The M.E. and the second autopsy BOTH ruled homicide. It’s not a criminal charge, so it’s not a matter of proof or not. It’s their conclusion.

“Could have” is nothing but concocted make believe. And your make believe scenario is nothing more than that.

I don’t give a fuck whether you disagree with me or not. I’m merely giving you the facts as presented in the two autopsies and by the two individuals who conducted them. You can contact them to bitch about their findings. I’m sure they’ll give your expert opinion all the consideration it deserves.

One more time, pally boy, the conclusion of homicide is not MY opinion. What part of that is so difficult gor you to grasp?
Click to expand...

Why are you such a cunt?
 
Cypress said:
It is remarkable that the exact same people who deny AGW-climate change are precisely the exact same people who hollered that COVID was a hoax. What are the odds?
Click to expand...

PLEASE SHOW US ALL THE TEST, UTILIZING SCIENTIFIC METHOD, PROVING THE THERMAL DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF .0004 (400PPM) ATMOSPEHRIC CONCENTRATIONS OF CO2;

THE "SCIENTISTS" OF NASA SEEM TO HAVE OMITTED THAT, AND POSTED A BUNCH OF THEORETICAL IDEAS AND CLAIMS, INSTEAD.


A "SHOW OF HANDS" =/= "SCIENTIFIC FACT".
 
Last edited:
PoliTalker said:
If we don't fix this and right away, we are looking at a massive immigration problem on our Southern Border, the likes of which would dwarf anything seen so far.

When sustenance farming becomes impossible in Central America, look out.

You think immigration is a problem now, you ain't seen nothing.

And what a tremendous challenge.

People who want to make America greater? This is our challenge.

America would do the world a great service by leading the way into a green future.

We have to change, and we have to get the rest of the world to change as well.

No more BS.

The debate is over.

The only debate now is not whether or not we are doing this. It's how great a job we are going to do of it.

Screw great again. We need to be greater than we have ever been.

No pressure...
Click to expand...

go eat fuck sauce, liar.
 
domer76 said:
One more time. The M.E. and the second autopsy BOTH ruled homicide. It’s not a criminal charge, so it’s not a matter of proof or not. It’s their conclusion.

“Could have” is nothing but concocted make believe. And your make believe scenario is nothing more than that.

I don’t give a fuck whether you disagree with me or not. I’m merely giving you the facts as presented in the two autopsies and by the two individuals who conducted them. You can contact them to bitch about their findings. I’m sure they’ll give your expert opinion all the consideration it deserves.

One more time, pally boy, the conclusion of homicide is not MY opinion. What part of that is so difficult for you to grasp?
Click to expand...

they're opinions.
 
domer76 said:
One more time. The M.E. and the second autopsy BOTH ruled homicide. It’s not a criminal charge, so it’s not a matter of proof or not. It’s their conclusion.

“Could have” is nothing but concocted make believe. And your make believe scenario is nothing more than that.

I don’t give a fuck whether you disagree with me or not. I’m merely giving you the facts as presented in the two autopsies and by the two individuals who conducted them. You can contact them to bitch about their findings. I’m sure they’ll give your expert opinion all the consideration it deserves.

One more time, pally boy, the conclusion of homicide is not MY opinion. What part of that is so difficult for you to grasp?
Click to expand...

But the state's claim is that Chauvin murdered Floyd

You get that, right little fella?

The ME's claim of homicide is an OPINION.

I happen to disagree with it.

Why can't you accept that???

Why do you crave acceptance of your biased, PC opinion????

So you either support the idea that Chauvin is guilty of some degree of murder or you don't.

You can fudge all you want by saying homicide is not a criminal charge, which we all know, but it's obvious you, like the state, think he murdered Floyd.

As for the second autopsy, it is bought and paid for bullshit.

If Chauvin had twisted Floyd's arm behind his back and he died from a combination of the drugs in his system and the stress of being arrested and having his arm twisted, it would technically be a homicide because Chauvin was in physical contact with him when he died.

But would he be on trial for murder?

Doubtful.

The state's claim is that Chauvin's knee on Floyd's neck caused Floyd's death by asphyxiation even though the ME says there was no evidence of that kind of injury.

If you don't like it, you can blow me.
 
Nomad said:
But the state's claim is that Chauvin murdered Floyd

You get that, right little fella?

The ME's claim of homicide is an OPINION.

I happen to disagree with it.

Why can't you accept that???

Why do you crave acceptance of your biased, PC opinion????

So you either support the idea that Chauvin is guilty of some degree of murder or you don't.

You can fudge all you want by saying homicide is not a criminal charge, which we all know, but it's obvious you, like the state, think he murdered Floyd.

As for the second autopsy, it is bought and paid for bullshit.

If Chauvin had twisted Floyd's arm behind his back and he died from a combination of the drugs in his system and the stress of being arrested and having his arm twisted, it would technically be a homicide because Chauvin was in physical contact with him when he died.

But would he be on trial for murder?

Doubtful.

The state's claim is that Chauvin's knee on Floyd's neck caused Floyd's death by asphyxiation even though the ME says there was no evidence of that kind of injury.

If you don't like it, you can blow me.
Click to expand...

this is how totalitarians are.
 
AssHatZombie said:
these people are legit going insane. the trump derangement syndrome is real. so real. so very real.
Click to expand...

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 92d28c5f5015a8c2.jpg
    92d28c5f5015a8c2.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 18
evince said:
Did your tiny brain go dark asshole


They just proved the case in real time
Click to expand...

No, they didn't. I have to ask if you actually read the article you linked to...you have a history of not doing that which has led you to epic and hilarious fails. PROTIP: don't trust the headline, read the article.

The word "evidence" was used a lot in that article. It was used in reference to climate models which by the author's admission hadn't yet proved anything. What kind of evidence doesn't prove anything? In addition, the "smoking gun" was carbon dioxide, methane and water vapor? Are you fucking serious? Do you even science at all?

Did you read the source material? It was linked to in the article but I doubt you even bothered to read the article so there's no way you read the source material. In order to continue this conversation I need to know what you think an atmospheric radiative kernel is.

I guess you have some reading to do, I've already done it so when you're up to speed let me know.
 
Guille said:
No, they didn't. I have to ask if you actually read the article you linked to...you have a history of not doing that which has led you to epic and hilarious fails. PROTIP: don't trust the headline, read the article.

The word "evidence" was used a lot in that article. It was used in reference to climate models which by the author's admission hadn't yet proved anything. What kind of evidence doesn't prove anything? In addition, the "smoking gun" was carbon dioxide, methane and water vapor? Are you fucking serious? Do you even science at all?

Did you read the source material? It was linked to in the article but I doubt you even bothered to read the article so there's no way you read the source material. In order to continue this conversation I need to know what you think an atmospheric radiative kernel is.

I guess you have some reading to do, I've already done it so when you're up to speed let me know.
Click to expand...

You know the woman is braindead, she has all these topics on continuous loop, press a button and the bullshit flows in a continuous stream. Gavin Schmidt, the head of NASA GISS, is not a climatologist but a mathematician who lives and breathes climate models.
 
Nomad said:
But the state's claim is that Chauvin murdered Floyd

You get that, right little fella?

The ME's claim of homicide is an OPINION.

I happen to disagree with it.

Why can't you accept that???

Why do you crave acceptance of your biased, PC opinion????

So you either support the idea that Chauvin is guilty of some degree of murder or you don't.

You can fudge all you want by saying homicide is not a criminal charge, which we all know, but it's obvious you, like the state, think he murdered Floyd.

As for the second autopsy, it is bought and paid for bullshit.

If Chauvin had twisted Floyd's arm behind his back and he died from a combination of the drugs in his system and the stress of being arrested and having his arm twisted, it would technically be a homicide because Chauvin was in physical contact with him when he died.

But would he be on trial for murder?

Doubtful.

The state's claim is that Chauvin's knee on Floyd's neck caused Floyd's death by asphyxiation even though the ME says there was no evidence of that kind of injury.

If you don't like it, you can blow me.
Click to expand...

Great. Let them prove murder in court then.

Great. You disagree with their opinion.

My PC opinion? :rofl2:

One more time. Homicide is a MANNER OF DEATH. It is not a criminal charge. It’s not really that difficult to grasp the difference. I don’t know why you are struggling with that.

I am not responsible for determining Chauvin’s guilt. The jury is.

OK, disregard the second autopsy. It changes nothing.

Spare me the “if/would” bullshit. In all of history, “if/would” has never occurred. Stop making up your own reality. It’s the argument of a loser.

The cause of death was determined to be “cardiopulmonary arrest”, not asphyxiation. So, once again, you’re wrong.
 
domer76 said:
Great. Let them prove murder in court then.

Great. You disagree with their opinion.

My PC opinion? :rofl2:

One more time. Homicide is a MANNER OF DEATH. It is not a criminal charge. It’s not really that difficult to grasp tge difference. I don’t know why you are struggling with that.

I am not responsible for determining Chauvin’s guilt. The jury is.

OK, disregard the second autopsy. It changes nothing.

Spare me tge “if/would” bullshit. In all of history, “if/would” has never occurred. Stop making up your own reality. It’s the argument of a loser.

The cause of death was determined to be “cardiopulmonary arrest”, not asphyxiation. So, once again, you’re wrong.
Click to expand...

You must be a truly odious bastard in real life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top