Newt takes his jab at R Presidential Hopefuls...

uscitizen said:
right just as Jefferson and such are our founding fathers, but this country has not turned out quite like they expected I think....neither did Newts movement.
Click to expand...
What do you mean? Of the 10 laws proposed 7 of 10 passed, which was the "neo-con" law? You are really spinning.

Sure you don't like the guy, but this is a sure attempt to rewrite history. No part of that "contract" is any "Contract 'ON'" Hence the question of "attacks" that is consistently following you.

You are caught in your own spin machine, running with the line of the Party you pretend that you are not part of while towing that line...
 
cawacko said:
You said the Contract for America started the neo-con movement. You have yet to say what in the contract you believe started the movement.
Click to expand...
I thought I said Newt did it ?
Anyway the cons embracing the likes of foulwell and Robberson was the beginning in my opinion.
 
uscitizen said:
I thought I said Newt did it ?
Anyway the cons embracing the likes of foulwell and Robberson was the beginning in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Which part of the Contract With America (formerly presented as 'on'), did this? Not even one mention of that kind of stuff in there.
 
Damocles said:
What do you mean? Of the 10 laws proposed 7 of 10 passed, which was the "neo-con" law? You are really spinning.

Sure you don't like the guy, but this is a sure attempt to rewrite history. No part of that "contract" is any "Contract 'ON'" Hence the question of "attacks" that is consistently following you.

You are caught in your own spin machine, running with the line of the Party you pretend that you are not part of while towing that line...
Click to expand...

Maybe I am just tired, worked all night. But that seemed a bit blurry for you Damo...

Darned offshore idiots. Said they were supposed to escalate if they had problems, well 6 hours in to problems and 1/2 hour till online and they still said this....
I told them it was beyond a problem and now critical...
Untrained and unable to take the ball and make a call. A cultural thing ? I dunno.
 
Last edited:
uscitizen said:
right just as Jefferson and such are our founding fathers, but this country has not turned out quite like they expected I think....neither did Newts movement.
Click to expand...

No it didn't, and Newt was as popular as hemorrhoids when he resigned in disgrace. So, yeah, put Newt at top of the ticket, go ahead.

However, I will say that to my knowledge he was not a neocon. The R party has plenty of different types of fruits and nuts, you know, so you shouldn't get bored.
 
Darla said:
No it didn't, and Newt was as popular as hemorrhoids when he resigned in disgrace. So, yeah, put Newt at top of the ticket, go ahead.

However, I will say that to my knowledge he was not a neocon. The R party has plenty of different types of fruits and nuts, you know, so you shouldn't get bored.
Click to expand...
I seriously doubt he would get the nod. But heck, stranger things have happened.
 
Darla said:
No it didn't, and Newt was as popular as hemorrhoids when he resigned in disgrace. So, yeah, put Newt at top of the ticket, go ahead.

However, I will say that to my knowledge he was not a neocon. The R party has plenty of different types of fruits and nuts, you know, so you shouldn't get bored.
Click to expand...

I do not think he was a neocon either but I feel that he spawned the movement that created neocons.
 
Damocles said:
What do you mean? Of the 10 laws proposed 7 of 10 passed, which was the "neo-con" law? You are really spinning.

Sure you don't like the guy, but this is a sure attempt to rewrite history. No part of that "contract" is any "Contract 'ON'" Hence the question of "attacks" that is consistently following you.

You are caught in your own spin machine, running with the line of the Party you pretend that you are not part of while towing that line...
Click to expand...

That's exactly the pont. uscitizen you say you are not a Democrat and you tell people to think for themselves but here you are repeating Democrat and left-wing talking points and when simply asked about them you have nothing to back it up with.
 
Can I helop it if demoncrat talking points and mine coincide ? do you not agree with anything the demoncrats say ?
Heck I could probably find one line from hitler or even Bush I could agree with if I dug long enough.
Whine whine whine.
need some cheese ?
 
uscitizen said:
Can I helop it if demoncrat talking points and mine coincide ? do you not agree with anything the demoncrats say ?
Heck I could probably find one line from hitler or even Bush I could agree with if I dug long enough.
Whine whine whine.
need some cheese ?
Click to expand...

lol... it it walks like a duck...

Obviously you don't have to say anything to us. It's a free board. You can say whatever the hell you want. But most peolpe will at least at attempt to back up their positions rather than throwing out one line statements with nothing behind them and not be able to respond when questioned about whawt you said.
 
uscitizen said:
Can I helop it if demoncrat talking points and mine coincide ? do you not agree with anything the demoncrats say ?
Heck I could probably find one line from hitler or even Bush I could agree with if I dug long enough.
Whine whine whine.
need some cheese ?
Click to expand...
lol. Mr. "Don't tow the line" is towing, and towing....
 
CAW, I do not have the time nor inclination to do a full evaluation of the rise of the neocon party.
Not even sure I have the writing skills to do it justice.
You write the book on it and I will buy one for giggles.
 
Didn't somebody interview Newt's parents about 10-12 years ago where the mother was smoking a cigarette and called Hillary a 'bitch'?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top