Now We Need To Revisit Lt. Michael Byrd

FALSE. It doesn't matter that he swore to protect someone, he was never authorized to assassinate anyone.


Once again, we have video evidence that shows that I am spot on, and that there is no lie beneath you. Why you, a leftist of all people, who supports every protestor who attacks police that you wish were defunded, suddenly goes to the mat to support an summary extrajudicial execution of a peaceful, unarmed protester by a cowardly, power-mad policeman shows that you are completely dominated by your sheer HATRED for those you perceive are political opponents.


Nope. Byrd did not have authorization to execute anyone. Byrd had only authorization to arrest people. Byrd committed murder and should answer for it in court.


Booolsh't. The video clearly shows that she was acting peacefully and that no rational, reasonable person would see any need to use deadly force. That you would support summary executions, just because the victims are Trump supporters, is sickening to say the least.


Nope, but if this is all you have, you lose. Byrd did not have authorization to execute anyone. Police don't get to do that. Why do you imagine that they do? In your mind, potentially being a Trump supporter warrants an immediate death sentence, yes?


Both are true. She was a good, safe distance AND her distance was totally irrelevant. The police could have, and should have, arrested her if they truly felt that she was somehow not allowed to be in that part of that public building. You are arguing that Ashli Babbit was TRESPASSING so clearly she had to be killed. Your position is horrifically absurd. Her distance was totally irrelevant yes, when you begin making the case that Ashli was moving from one place in a public building to another, so she deserved a summary, extrajudicial execution.


The video that proves you are lying out of a desperate attempt to somehow legitimize an extrajudicial execution of an American patriot because she was a potential Trump supporter. Have I said "Fuck you" to you lately?


FTFY. She was shot because she was a potential Trump supporter who loved the US, and the coward who carried out the execution has your full blessing.

Does that about sum it up?
Random words. No apparent coherency.
 
I recognize vertical as vertical and horizontal as horizontal. I also recognize that it is wrong to kill another living human, regardless of political affiliation. Who was supposed to teach you that but failed?
Random words. No apparent coherency.
 
I recognize vertical as vertical and horizontal as horizontal. I also recognize that it is wrong to kill another living human, regardless of political affiliation. Who was supposed to teach you that but failed?
Since vertical is only vertical how could Ashli Babbitt be partway through the window when she was shot.

If she was not passing through the window then the laws of physics would not allow for her to be shot by any gun currently known to exist since bullets can not take sharp right turns.

Gosh. I wonder if you have ever mentioned on this forum about how it was OK for someone to kill another human being. There are so many posts by you to show you are nothing but a liar when it comes to your positions.
 
You traitorous trumptards
You tyrannical leftists ...

wipe your ass with The Constitution
... wipe your asses with the Constitution ...

then whip it out only to hypocritically wag your fingers.
... then violate it every which way from Sunday while engaging in lawfare against your political opponents.

You love for trumpism has totally broken you morally.
Your terminal TDS has enslaved you to others who now do all of your thinking for you, condemning you to be completely miserable forever.
 
LOL... You have been shown those videos repeatedly
Too funny! You haven't provided a single one. You can post one right here in this thread ... except that you can't post even one here in this thread. Did you notice how your post doesn't contain any examples? Did you notice how you stupid believed that you were folling people?

and you simply denied they showed violence.
... because they didn't show any. Did you notice how you kept insisting that the videos showed violence ... that was simply cropped out of the video, so we should all just assume that it was there? Do you remember that? Do you? I do. You didn't show any videos that showed any cops being beaten by anyone, almost as if there weren't any cops beaten by anyone.

You are delusional in your beliefs and deny reality.
You are delusional at the behest of those who do your thinking for you. Why don't you post some videos showing cops being beaten by people who were thereafter arraigned?
 
Show me a video of a cop being beaten by someone who was later arraigned for it.



What? You can't? Well, I think we all know why that is.
It's alright tiger - you daddy twump pardoned all your thug friends. "Rule of law" to trumptards is nothing but a punch line at their gay field keggers.
 
You tyrannical leftists ...


... wipe your asses with the Constitution ...


... then violate it every which way from Sunday while engaging in lawfare against your political opponents.


Your terminal TDS has enslaved you to others who now do all of your thinking for you, condemning you to be completely miserable forever.
<smh> No hope for you.
 
Too funny! You haven't provided a single one. You can post one right here in this thread ... except that you can't post even one here in this thread. Did you notice how your post doesn't contain any examples? Did you notice how you stupid believed that you were folling people?


... because they didn't show any. Did you notice how you kept insisting that the videos showed violence ... that was simply cropped out of the video, so we should all just assume that it was there? Do you remember that? Do you? I do. You didn't show any videos that showed any cops being beaten by anyone, almost as if there weren't any cops beaten by anyone.


You are delusional at the behest of those who do your thinking for you. Why don't you post some videos showing cops being beaten by people who were thereafter arraigned?
Random words. No apparent coherency.
 
Lt. Michael Byrd assassinated an unarmed, peaceful Ashli Babbit in the Capitol for jumping vertically. Democrats were united in high-fiving Byrd for wasting a Trump supporter and quickly absolved him of all wrongdoing ... because, after all, Ashli Babbit was a Trump supporter. Democrats argued that Byrd was rightfully "frightened for his life" given all the after-the-fact hysteria that Democrats generated in order to bury Trump.

Enter SCOTUS. In a unanimous 9-0 landmark decision Barnes v. Felix less than two weeks ago (15 May 2025), the Supreme Court declared that it is not sufficient for a police officer to claim that he was in "fear for his life or the lives of others" when using deadly force. An objectively clear threat must exist such that it is determined that any rational, reasonable police officer in that situation would have also used deadly force. Given that the unarmed and peaceful Ashli Babbit's small vertical leap in a public building did not objectively obligate the use of deadly force, the cowardly Lt. Byrd needs to be arraigned for the blatant murder that he committed.

10980264_082721-cc-ap-Michael-Byrd-img.jpeg
Why won’t Trump prosecute him?
 
Too funny! You haven't provided a single one. You can post one right here in this thread ... except that you can't post even one here in this thread. Did you notice how your post doesn't contain any examples? Did you notice how you stupid believed that you were folling people?


... because they didn't show any. Did you notice how you kept insisting that the videos showed violence ... that was simply cropped out of the video, so we should all just assume that it was there? Do you remember that? Do you? I do. You didn't show any videos that showed any cops being beaten by anyone, almost as if there weren't any cops beaten by anyone.


You are delusional at the behest of those who do your thinking for you. Why don't you post some videos showing cops being beaten by people who were thereafter arraigned?
I noticed you claimed that violence wasn't actually violence even when the violence shown in the video fit the legal definition of violence.

But since you are delusional. Go ahead and claim there is no violence in this body camera video from Fanone on Jan 6th.
 
I notice your post is devoid of any videos whatsoever.
I notice you don't believe something happened unless you can see video of it. Can you show us a video of anyone shooting Ashli Babbitt?

Certainly you have the same standard of evidence of violence for that as you do for attacks on police officers. So where is the video that shows who you allege shot Babbitt?
 
Back
Top