Once you see the strings..........

Nordberg said:
What fraud? The one you believe in without a scintilla of evidence?
Click to expand...
You are a shill for those who fix election results, so naturally you won't accept even a scintilla of the overwhelming evidence, or of the conclusive videos, or of the thousands of sworn legal affidavits.

I hope you realize that you fit the definition of "delusion disorder" 2-a-T
 
Nordberg said:
Yes, there sure as fuck was an election. A fair and honest o\ne. More proof, as if any was required, came today when Georgia released the grand jury report with 23 members, who were unanimously stating we had a fair and honest election. They sat for months listening to testimony. They even suggest that 8 Trumpies perjured themselves in the testimony. They suggest indicting them.
Trump should be indicted too.
Click to expand...
None of this is what my OP is about. Try again.
 
QP! said:
And we have you ducking as expected and as i predicted.

I cannot answer your question as you are just labeling what you do not agree with or like as Rino's when that makes zero sense. If you want me to address first you need to prove you know what a Rino is, nd explain how Adam or Liz would qualify as Rino's??

You cannot ask me to explain a term you are using wrongly and corrupted.
Click to expand...
... and you've cucked out. Got it.
 
QP! said:
As expected and predicted. You have no answer and are exposed.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. gfm7175 is using the term correctly. Any officially registered Republican who endeavors politically for the benefit of the Democrat Party over the benefit of Republican voters is a Republican in name only (RINO). You have not provided any rebuttal to what gfm7175 has asserted; you have merely quibbled erroneously in order to buy time.

My presumption is that you fully realize that gfm7175 is totally correct and that you are merely struggling at the behest of whoever is telling you what to believe.
 
IBDaMann said:
Incorrect. gfm7175 is using the term correctly. Any officially registered Republican who endeavors politically for the benefit of the Democrat Party over the benefit of Republican voters is a Republican in name only (RINO). You have not provided any rebuttal to what gfm7175 has asserted; you have merely quibbled erroneously in order to buy time.

My presumption is that you fully realize that gfm7175 is totally correct and that you are merely struggling at the behest of whoever is telling you what to believe.
Click to expand...


You make an incorrect assumption that invalidates your post though.

Trump ran for the Republican party which ALREADY had an identity and definition and he fit almost none of it. So when he called himself a Republican it was literally in NAME only as he held none of the beliefs.

He then took over the party and made it into the Trumpism party, which is fine, but he kept the Republican name, in name ONLY, for continuity. If Trumpism endures, the party Trump changed it to (Trumpism) will become defined as Republicanism, and the definition's will have to be updated to reflect that change, much like when the old Democrat party split and took a turn to more Progressive policies and away from its prior more Republican roots. For a short period the new Dem Party were Dems in name only, but over time as the new party identity grew, that definition had to be changed.


Trumpism may die by this next election (or it might not) and if it does and the party reverts back more to what Mitch McConnell wants (a true Republican as it is defined NOW) then those who followed Trumpism will be noted by history as Republicans in Name Only as they never endured to change the party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top