He's saying Democracy leads to smart people.
I'm not sure that is what he is saying.
He's saying Democracy leads to smart people.
You do realize Google isn't a dictionary...right?
I'm not sure that is what he is saying.
Yup, and neither is philosophy... But I included them both in my list of examples because Google offers definitions of words in their search bar, and philosophy is the true source of the definition of the word 'religion'.
That's what he's saying. He thinks the Athenian Democracy was a great time in human history. I think he's wrong but there's a conversation to be had there.
It was without a doubt a very interesting time.
Google is a search engine, not a dictionary.
A representative democracy has no constitution. There is nothing to stop mob rule.
The United States is organized as a federated republic. It is has a constitution. It is federated. That means it layers of constitutions.
Yup, [meaning that I agreed that Google is not a dictionary] and neither is philosophy... But I included them both in my list of examples because Google offers definitions of words in their search bar, and philosophy is the true source of the definition of the word 'religion'.
My whole point in this is that "which source's definition is the correct one"? Forget Google, since you're turning it into a red herring (LOOK! LOOK AWAY FROM THE MAIN ARGUMENT AT HAND!!!)
My point is that dictionaries offer a wide variety of definitions for the same word in the same context... Which one is the correct one? Which dictionary is correct, and which definition within a specific dictionary is the correct definition? This is the issue at hand...
What you will ultimately discover is that dictionaries are not authoritative and dictionaries do not own nor define words...
I am not grasping as to the why. His post was merely lamenting his view, but it didn't actually say anything. I thought it was an assault on religion. :shrugs:
Which source is the correct one? uh, they tend to agree.
I just showed you that they didn't...
Yup, [meaning that I agreed that Google is not a dictionary] and neither is philosophy... But I included them both in my list of examples because Google offers definitions of words in their search bar, and philosophy is the true source of the definition of the word 'religion'.
My whole point in this is that "which source's definition is the correct one"? Forget Google, since you're turning it into a red herring (LOOK! LOOK AWAY FROM THE MAIN ARGUMENT AT HAND!!!)
My point is that dictionaries offer a wide variety of definitions for the same word in the same context... Which one is the correct one? Which dictionary is correct, and which definition within a specific dictionary is the correct definition? This is the issue at hand...
What you will ultimately discover is that dictionaries are not authoritative and dictionaries do not own nor define words...
See post #179. Also, see post #190 directly after the part which you stopped at...Stop right there, you did no such thing.
'lack of intelligence' mantra dismissed...Son, for the next few weeks the JV field might be better for you.
'lack of intelligence' mantra dismissed...Spend some time talking to Domer, he's JV quality.
this
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
Yeah, they do. The only job of a dictionary is to define words. If a word can't be defined our language means nothing and we can't talk to each other.
That's not actually what I said. You are the one who mentioned all of the various dictionaries. I'm willing to bet their definitions for words are the same or very close. You have misinterpreted my problem with dictionaries. I'd go into this further with you but in this thread you're not the one I want to talk to.
That's what he's saying. He thinks the Athenian Democracy was a great time in human history. I think he's wrong but there's a conversation to be had there.
It was without a doubt a very interesting time.
It "layers of constitutions?"
Who woulda thunk it!
Which source is the correct one? uh, they tend to agree.